![]() |
More of my sitesWinInfo Daily News
|
About this siteFor six years, the Internet Nexus served as my technology blog, but I've since started blogging at the SuperSite Blog instead. If you're looking for the blog, please head there. --Paul Saturday, January 22, 2005Linux Inc.Business Week:Linus Torvalds once led a ragtag band of software geeks. Not anymore. Here's an inside look at how the unusual Linux business model increasingly threatens Microsoft.A fascinating read, and highly recommended. [ Posted at 7:48 PM | Permalink ]
Lawyer fights back at AppleInfoWorld:The lawyer for the Harvard freshman being sued by Apple Computer for publishing trade secrets about the company's products, says Apple is stifling free speech.Damn right they wouldn't. This lawsuit will fail miserably, and it will prove to be a rare PR blunder for Apple, which is more beloved by its fans, practically, than any company on earth. Way to go, guys. [ Posted at 9:27 AM | Permalink ]
Thursday, January 20, 200519 million Firefox downloadsSpread Firefox:What an amazing accomplishment you all have made. In just a little over 10 weeks, you've helped to spread the word to over 19 million people. 19,000,000! When numbers get this big, I personally have a difficult time wrapping my brain around them so I turn to some volumes I can actually imagine. Nineteen million people would fill the NFL's largest football stadium -- 200 times over. Think of that, the largest professional sports venue in the US, stacked on top of itself 200 times! It's about the total population of Australia or New York! Not that it actually helps me visualize anything but my estimate is that these downloads add up to about 90 terabytes.[ Posted at 5:40 PM | Permalink ]
Browser Showdown: Firefox vs. Internet ExplorerBBspot:Other tech sites will bore you with in-depth "technical details" and performance specs in their product analysis. At BBspot we pull back from the boring benchmarks to compare the superficialities, and we do it all on a single page. Now that Firefox is gaining ground on Internet Explorer it is time to compare the two face to face.LOL. Good stuff. Related: Microsoft's AntiSpyware Tool Removes Internet Explorer [ Posted at 5:39 PM | Permalink ]
FAQ: CableCard? What's that?CNET:f you're shopping for a new TV or personal video recorder (PVR) this year, you should know something about CableCard. At this month's Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas, TiVo, Hewlett-Packard and others unveiled new products incorporating the technology. Most new digital television models including HDTVs now include CableCard hook-ups.[ Posted at 3:18 PM | Permalink ]
Xbox Live Sets New Online Gaming BenchmarkMicrosoft PR:Coming off one of the hottest holiday seasons for video game software sales in history, Microsoft Corp. today announced that its Xbox Live online gaming service has set a new standard with more than 1.4 million members, exceeding expectations and cementing its leadership position in the digital entertainment landscape. This additional news comes on the heels of 14 consecutive months of increased market share for Xbox, the only console to see an increase of market share in 2004.[ Posted at 2:59 PM | Permalink ]
Top Nine Reasons the Apple Dock Still SucksAsk Tog:The [Mac OS X] Dock ... makes a great demo. But ... the Dock is akin to a brightly-colored set of children's blocks, ideal for your first words—dog, cat, run, Spot, run—but not too effective for displaying the contents of War and Peace.You gotta love Tog. Related: Panther: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly [ Posted at 8:40 AM | Permalink ]
Flaws found in underlying system of Mac's OS XTech World:Security firm Immunity has reported several vulnerabilities in Darwin, the Unix implementation which Apple calls the "rock-solid foundation" of Mac OS X. The vulnerabilities affect all recent versions of OS X, Immunity said in an advisory published on Wednesday.Some? Some say that? You'd have to be crazy to say otherwise. We might equally call AmigaDOS 2.x the most secure OS out there, because it will never be hacked. Immunity founder and chief executive Dave Aitel said the problems wouldn't be very serious for most users, because OS X isn't widely used as a server operating system. He said security experts have never considered the operating system particularly invulnerable. "Apple's never been that secure from a local perspective," he told Techworld.Finally, a bit of sanity about Mac OS X security. When gadget guys who know nothing about security, like David Pogue, say that Mac OS X is more secure, it means nothing. But when companies like Secunia and Immunity show up, it's time to pay attention. [ Posted at 8:35 AM | Permalink ]
Wednesday, January 19, 2005Mac mini, meet the competitionEver since Apple's controversial Mac mini was released last week, there's been a lot of discussion online about whether the "BYODKM" (Bring Your Own Display, Keyboard, and Mouse) machine offers viable competition to the Wintel options. Invariably, these discussions have been split down partisan lines. Mac fanatics, largely, argue that the Mac mini does, indeed, offer a price-conscious alternative to PCs, and they struggle to justify that claim with machine-to-machine comparisons that do little more than prove that the mini compete well with just one of the many PC makes out there. Mac detractors, meanwhile, say that the Mac mini is just more of the same, and that it doesn't offer enough expandability or a low-enough cost to justify the purchase. Wintel-based machines, they say, are just cheaper.Well, enough talk. Let's compare the Mac mini to actually-shipping PC configurations that are available this very week. To perform this comparison, I'm using last Sunday's Best Buy circular, and not just a single PC make from a single PC vendor. All of the systems I'm going to compare are $500 or less, the same price as a bare-bones, low-end Mac mini. And once the comparison is done, I'd like to discuss the ramifications of the competition and clarify where I stand on the Mac mini debate. First, let's clarify what a Mac mini is. The Mac mini is an incredibly small Macintosh computer that costs $500. Essentially an iBook G4 notebook computer sans screen, keyboard, and mouse, it comes with a 1.25 GHz PowerPC G4 processor, 256 MB of RAM, an ATI Radeon 9200 graphics chip with 32 MB of RAM, a 40 GB notebook-style hard drive, and a slot-loading, notebook-style combo drive. There is no internal expansion per se: You can upgrade to a more acceptable 512 MB of RAM for $75 (recommended, if not required) and to a DVD burner for $100 (also recommended), but you must do this when you purchase the machine, or bring it to an Apple Store later; you can't really do it yourself. Also, an 80 GB hard drive upgrade is $50 (again, recommended). For $600, you can get a 1.42 GHz version that already includes the 80 GB hard drive upgrade, so the processor upgrade is essentially $50. For this reason, many have decried the real price of the Mac mini to be $775, unless you need wireless capabilities, which can make the price closer to $850. Suddenly, we're not in bargain basement territory any more. ![]() No matter. Let's assume a base Mac mini with the necessary 512 MB of RAM upgrade is the least anyone would really want. Such a machine costs $575. This machine features laptop-type components, and not the more powerful desktop-type components that PCs use. It has no display, keyboard, or mouse. It is only minimally expandable. So. What does the PC world look like? Exhibit number one: Compaq $509 For $509, or almost the exact cost of a bare bones Mac mini, Best Buy will sell you an easily expandable Compaq tower PC with a 2.1 GHz AMD Sempron processor, 512 MB of RAM, an 80 GB hard drive, a multi-format DVD writer, an integrated 9-in-1 media reader, a 17-inch CRT monitor, and a printer. It's a complete computing solution. For $100 more, or the price of a SuperDrive upgrade on your Mac mini, you get a faster processor, a 200 GB hard drive, and a double-layer multi-format DVD writer (!) ... astonishing. For $50 more, you can get an HP PSC1350 printer/scanner/copier. Unbelievable. Here it is: ![]() Now, it should be noted that the $509 price tag is after $300 in mail-in-rebates, so the out-of-pocket price is $809 at the time of purchase. However, the actual price of the system--and it's a full system, not just a box--is, at $509, simply amazing. Exhibit number two: eMachines $329 If that Compaq is too expensive, consider the $329 eMachines bundle that Best Buy is also selling. This little wonder features a decent-size tower case, a 2.66 GHz Intel Celeron processor, 256 MB of RAM, a 60 GB hard drive, a CD-RW drive, a 17-inch CRT display, and a printer. Yikes. For $130, you can upgrade to a 15-inch LCD display. For $140 (a total cost of $460), you can upgrade to a 2.93 GHz Celeron processor, 512 MB of RAM, an 80 hard drive, a double layer multi-format DVD writer (!), and an 8-in-1 media reader, an incredible bargain. For $50, you can upgrade the printer to a Lexmark X5270 printer/scanner/copier. Sweet. Here it is: ![]() Like the Compaq, the eMachines bundle requires mail-in-rebates, this time to the tune of $330. But like the Compaq, the eMachines is also a complete system, with PC, display, keyboard, mouse, speakers, and printer. It's components are easily upgraded. It comes in an expandable tower case. And so on. Conclusions So, what do these deals show us? First, you can get a lot of PC--indeed, a whole PC system including a large CRT screen and a printer--for the same price, or less, than the Mac mini. Second, these PC systems are far more expandable than the Mac mini, thanks to their comparatively voluminous tower cases, with readily available RAM slots, room for more hard drives and optical drives, and various add-in cards: You can even get integrated 9-in-1 (or 8-in-1) media readers, which is a huge plus. Third, and perhaps most important, none of this matters. Put simply, the people who buy $300 to $500 PC systems at Best Buy are never, ever going to be Apple customers. The people who will be attracted to the Mac mini are people who already have expensive PCs but are looking for a second machine. They are into digital media and are perhaps taken with the style of the iPod. They can afford a $500 second machine, just like they can afford an iPod. And they number in the millions. They will not be buying either of the PCs shown above, not ever. When it comes to this kind of purchase, the $500 price tag of the Mac mini means just one thing. Like the iPod, the Mac mini is an affordable luxury and it will, in my opinion, open up Mac OS X to a much wider audience. The Mac mini, however, does not compete feature-for-feature or price-for-price with the PC. And you know what? Neither does the iPod, when compared to its competition. Just look what happened there. People aren't buying these things based on features. There's something intangible happening here. My prediction is that the Mac mini will reverse Apple's market share slide. And one year from now, if not sooner, all of us--even the detractors, begrudgingly--will credit this product with turning around the Macs fortunes. Comparing apples to oranges, or in this case, Apples to eMachines, just doesn't make sense. [ Posted at 1:47 PM | Permalink ]
Mac market share stalled at 1.9 percent in 2004According to market researchers at IDC, PC vendors shipped 177.5 million units during 2004, up 14.7 percent from the 154.7 million units shipped in 2003. Apple, meanwhile, shipped 3.504 million units, up 13 percent from the 3.098 million units the company shipped in 2003.Using these numbers, Apple's market share for 2004 was almost exactly 2 percent. That's .1 percent higher than Apple's 2003 market share of 1.9 percent. Sounds good. However, another big name market researcher, Gartner, puts PC sales in 2004 at 189 million units. Since we'll never be able to figure out which one of these yearly numbers is accurate, let's split the difference at 183.25 million units. So Apple's share of the overall PC market is 1.9 percent, exactly the same as its market share in 2003. Will the Mac mini change the equation? I think so, making this year quite interesting. [ Posted at 9:09 AM | Permalink ]
Apple: Four-week wait for iPod ShuffleReuters:It could be deja vu all over again for Apple Computer Inc..Sigh. Here we go again. You know, like many people who are into technology, I get excited about products like the iPod shuffle and the Mac mini. But some of my most critical opinions about Apple are the direct result of this kind of behavior. Is anyone honestly going to tell me that Steve Jobs didn't know about this when he appeared at MacWorld last week? It's aggravating. [ Posted at 8:44 AM | Permalink ]
Monday, January 17, 2005Could EA Be the Next Disney?Business 2.0:Electronic Arts makes one of every four videogames sold in the world (and that's before it took The Sims online). CEO Larry Probst says he's just getting started building "the greatest entertainment company ever."OK, so this story is over 2 years old, but talk about prescient. Today, EA is stronger than ever, thanks to its partnerships with Microsoft, the NFL, and various other companies. Unbelievable. [ Posted at 8:31 PM | Permalink ]
Transmeta -- how a great idea, brilliant minds and big investors equaled a big flopMercury News:Great ideas don't always make for great businesses. Just look at Transmeta.I'll tell you what happened. The Pentium-M happened. Transmeta's flaw was that it was emulating x86 hardware, slowly. The company's only true success was getting Intel off its ass and away from the Pentium 4/4M series and into a new, truly mobile chipset, the Centrino, which included the Pentium-M processor. We can all thank Transmeta for that. But unlike the Transmeta Crusoe, Intel's solution performed amazingly well right out of the gate. Game over. [ Posted at 8:11 PM | Permalink ]
Mac Mini may chip away at WindowsSeattle Post-Intelligencer:Analysts who track Microsoft Corp. and the computer market say the Mac Mini could begin to change the competitive landscape. The computer will start at $499. It will be sold without keyboard, display or mouse, but with input ports that Apple says are designed to let most PC users continue using the keyboards, displays and mice they already own.That's actually a very interesting point, one that again puts the success of the iPod in perspective. ![]()
Patriots Nation RecapPerfect time for Patriots:Don't be surprised if the Patriots are reigning Super Bowl champs next time local fans trek to the Razor. In a near-perfect game yesterday, the devoted sons of Bill Belichick grounded the heretofore high-flying Indianapolis Colts, 20-3, advancing to the AFC Championship game in Pittsburgh next Sunday night. A win against the Steelers at Heinz Field would put the Patriots in Super Bowl XXXIX Feb. 6 in Jacksonville, Fla., with a chance to earn dynasty status by winning a third championship in four seasons. ![]() Cold-clocked: Maybe the signs and the chants were a little harsh during New England's 20-3 pounding of the Colts and Manning yesterday, which punched New England's ticket to the AFC Championship game Sunday at Heinz Field in Pittsburgh. ![]() Manning: Beating a dead horse: For the second season in a row, Manning and his teammates were eliminated from the postseason by a better-prepared and more physical team. ![]()
Snow Bowl II: Pats pummel Colts in the Foxboro snowAh yes. Let's turn to the Indianapolis Star for a wonderful recap of last night's Patriots 20 - 3 dismantling of the supposedly unstoppable Indianapolis Colts. (I was at the game, as you might expect, as I attend most home games):The snow began about an hour before kickoff. It came in swirling sheets like white mist, and most of the sellout crowd of 68,756 stood throughout the night, huddled against the damp chill. The temperature was 25 degrees at halftime, and falling. Steam rose over both teams' huddles.
And in equally good news, the inept New York Jets blew yet another chance to get past the divisional round despite a hapless Pittsburgh team handing them their worst game of the season. How did the Jets respond to this gift? It's over-rated offense didn't score a single touchdown. So much for that "rivalry." Now it's on to Pittsburgh and then the Super Bowl. New England has proven itself to be the best team in the league: No matter what happens next week, 2004-5 was a banner season, no doubt about it. [ Posted at 3:19 PM | Permalink ]
|
|
Nexus Home | Nexus Archives | Email Paul
|