![]() |
More of my sitesWinInfo Daily News
|
About this siteFor six years, the Internet Nexus served as my technology blog, but I've since started blogging at the SuperSite Blog instead. If you're looking for the blog, please head there. --Paul Friday, February 11, 2005The Shuffle: A subcompact iPodConsumer Reports:If the pricey and stylish full-sized Apple iPods are the Lexuses of digital-music players, the new $99 iPod Shuffle is more like the Toyota Echo--a decent performer of the same pedigree that's smaller, cheaper, and a lot less luxurious. The Shuffle did well in our tests, but it isn't for everyone, even if you're in the market for a small digital-music player.[ Posted at 11:59 AM | Permalink ]
Thursday, February 10, 2005Napster Vs. iTunes: Weighing The Comparative AdvantagesHartford Courant:Napster takes a radically different approach that essentially says: Why buy a little music when you can rent much more of it instead?Of course. But there's no reason these two models can't coexist, and that's a fact many people don't seem to understand. Consider movies. There's a booming market for DVD movie purchases, but lots of people still watch movies on subscription services like HBO or your cable company's On Demand service. Neither of these latter two options let you "own" the movies, but you get access to a huge and diverse library of films instead. Yeah, if you want to watch "Dude, Where's My Car?" over and over again, the iTunes model is there for you. But if you think you may actually change and mature over time, the Napster To Go model makes sense. It's all about choice. [ Posted at 9:30 AM | Permalink ]
Yahoo! Toolbar Beta for Mozilla Firefox BrowserYahoo:Search the Web from anywhere onlineAccording to the beta release notes, the Yahoo toolbar only works with Firefox 1.0 and newer, though support will be added for other Mozilla and Netscape browsers in the future. It doesn't yet work for OS X or Linux, but will. And the beta version doesn't support Yahoo Anti-Spy, though that, too, will be added in the future. [ Posted at 9:15 AM | Permalink ]
Google's Chef Speaks, but Not Its Finance OfficerNew York Times:Google summoned financial analysts to its headquarters in Mountain View, Calif., yesterday for its first major presentation since its public offering last August. But in four hours of speeches, company executives barely touched on the company's finances.I hate Google. Granted, I know more about Google than most of the people that seem to love the company for some reason, but this story represents everything that's wrong with the company. Yeah, we get it, you're different. But you're also ridiculous. You can be different and excellent, like Apple. Google is no Apple. [ Posted at 9:06 AM | Permalink ]
Mac Meets PC and Both Learn to ShareNew York Times:When Steve Jobs, Apple's chief executive, introduced the $499 Mac Mini in January, he called it a "bring your own display, keyboard and mouse" machine. Implicit in that characterization is that the Mini is meant to appeal in part to PC owners who may want to give Apple a try, and who already have those peripherals connected to their Windows machines.[ Posted at 9:04 AM | Permalink ]
Wednesday, February 09, 2005id Confirms Date of DoomIGN:Activision and id Software today confirmed the Xbox version of Doom 3 and the PC expansion, Doom 3: Resurrection of Evil, will ship during the week of April 4, 2005.[ Posted at 6:36 PM | Permalink ]
Dell 30 GB Digital Jukebox MP3 player Dell.com:The new Dell 30 GB Digital Jukebox MP3 Player promises the ease of use and value of the original DJ with an enhanced form factor and capacity options. Weighing just 6.5 Oz, the Dell DJ 30 delivers high-quality, hard-drive based audio. The second-generation Digital Jukebox with 30 GB capacity lets you carry up to 15,000 songs at any given time and offers up to 12 hours of battery life to play them.Looks good, and as always you get more for less at Dell. [ Posted at 8:47 AM | Permalink ]
Tuesday, February 08, 2005The Legacy of the Apple Lisa Personal ComputerApple Lisa Tribute:This paper is an attempt by a long time Lisa user to clarify the significance of the Apple Lisa personal computer for the computing industry. The audience of this paper is anyone who has an interest in innovative computing technology and wants to learn a little about Apple Computer's brief foray into this area via the Lisa computer.Written way back in 1993, this paper is an nonetheless an interesting moment-in-time look back at a seminal product in personal computing history. ![]()
1.5 GB Portable MP3 Jukebox: $99Amazon.com:PD's new PD-1000 portable jukebox comes with a 1 inch 1.5GB hard drive which can store 375 songs, never before has such a compact player has this much capacity. It has fast USB 2.0 for quick transfer of songs and 13.5 hours continuous playback time.You know, just in case the iPod shuffle is too damn cool for you. [ Posted at 2:15 PM | Permalink ]
Subscription services challenge dominance of Apple's iPodAssociated Press:While the music subscription approach has grown in recent years, far more music fans have opted to buy songs by the track, a business model popularized by Apple Computer's iTunes Music Store and its hugely successful iPod portable player.[ Posted at 11:18 AM | Permalink ]
Apple's New Mac Mini: A True 21st Century Trojan HorseFortune (subscription required for full article):Apple's new Mac mini certainly doesn't break any new ground in technology; it's basically just the same guts from a last-generation Mac portable, sans the screen, keyboard and cursor controller. From a technical point of view, the mini is pretty minimal. The basic configuration of a single 1.25-gigahertz G4 chip, 256 megabytes of system memory, a CD-R/W and DVD-ROM combo drive, and a 40-gigabyte hard drive would be considered ho-hum, if not slug-like, if one of the Windows-based box-makers had come up with the idea. In fact, one can easily find entry-level Windows-based PCs that offer faster processors, more memory, greater storage—plus a display, keyboard and mouse—for less money.Finally! It's nice to see a well-written, factual article about the Mac in general and the Mac mini specifically. And he's right: Forget all the logical problems with the mini (the "real" price and the nightmare upgrade problems): The mini is quite definitely a Trojan horse aimed squarely at the hundreds of millions of people using Windows. Surely some of them are fed up with the problems and have been hearing about the Mac. Surely some of them would be willing to give it a go. Who knows? This could be the next generation of Mac users, a new breed finally, that breaks the stale DNA that is currently hampering the Mac community. New Mac users? I think it could happen. [ Posted at 9:18 AM | Permalink ]
Google MapsGoogle Maps:Getting from point A to point B just got a lot easier. Google Maps shows you where you want to go — and tells you what you'll find when you get there.Now that is just cool. [ Posted at 9:15 AM | Permalink ]
Monday, February 07, 2005New England: Back-to-back-to-backBoston Red Sox:For those Red Sox fans who might think there is nothing else to live for now that they have the long-awaited world championship, here is a unique opportunity for 2005: Becoming the first market to string together consecutive titles in the Super Bowl, World Series, Super Bowl and World Series.On so many levels, the past year has definitely been one of the best ever. [ Posted at 6:17 PM | Permalink ]
Mozilla gives Sunbird its wingsZDNet:The Mozilla Foundation has released the first version of Sunbird, a standalone calendar application, and you can download it here.[ Posted at 3:40 PM | Permalink ]
BEST. EVER.ESPN:[The New England Patriots] were already a dynasty.[ Posted at 2:59 PM | Permalink ]
A Dynasty Is BornPhiladelphia Inquirer:With their 24-21 win over the Eagles, the Patriots have become the NFL's team of the decade, after beating Carolina last year and St. Louis after the 2001 season.[ Posted at 2:40 PM | Permalink ]
Key quotes and comments from the Fortunte Jobs interview Reading through the Jobs interview in Fortune Magazine, a few points stand out:Think back about just how irrelevant Apple seemed even two years ago. Its share of the personal-computing market had shrunk inexorably throughout the 1990s to a tiny 2%.Ahem. Apple's marketshare is still less than 2 percent in the PC market. Microsoft's stake in Apple is now worth well over $1 billion.Interesting. [In] a 1998 meeting, Jobs asked Adobe Systems executives to develop a Mac version of their consumer video-editing program changed his mind. "They said flat-out no," Jobs recalls. "We were shocked, because they had been a big supporter in the early days of the Mac. But we said, 'Okay, if nobody wants to help us, we're just going to have to do this ourselves.' "Yikes. I find it somewhat ironic that Adobe's stupidity led to the some of the best software ever made, Apple's iLife and Final Cut products. Today Apple gets people hooked with free online updates and then, every year or so, offers to sell them a full overhaul loaded with new features—and more and more users are willing to pay. OS X has already gone through four versions, named Cheetah, Puma, Jaguar, and Panther. It's a tactic that Microsoft and other software makers have tried with much less success—Windows users in particular have grown leery of the chronic computer crashes and conflicts between programs that its upgrades cause. Apple engineered ways to minimize such problems.Well, not quite. Apple doesn't "engineer" ways to avoid problems. Microsoft has a much larger user base, which happens to be using a much wider range of software and hardware products. It's just harder to support all those configurations. It's not even comparable. To give Apple credit for having to support a minimal number of configurations is a bit much. Apple's computer hardware business ... still accounts for 60% of annual salesHey, they are named Apple Computer for a reason. Still, one has to wonder how long that will last: I haven't checked, but I bet Apple's hardware business is making up less and less of the bottom line with each passing year. As with NeXT before it, I expect Apple to change its name as result. Then there's a breathless and overly-long part of this article that focuses on the creation of iTunes and the iPod. I feel that this part of the article is inaccurate. Apple purchased a program called SoundJam and turned it into iTunes, but while the article mentions the purchase, the author then goes on to explain how iTunes was "created" in just 4 months. Eh. More problematic: The iPod was created by a third party, not Apple, and after IBM passed on it, Apple licensed the rights. This article describes an alternative history where Apple created the iPod in-house, and it doesn't mention the third party--PortalPlayer--that really created the iPod, nor the other companies, like Creative, that were innovating with MP3 players (both hard drive- and flash-based) before Apple entered the market. Curious. Jobs ... estimates that this year Apple will generate $1 billion in revenue from selling applications and updates, plus other software-related revenue generated by the iTunes Music Store and its .Mac online subscription service, which has 600,000 members. That's almost double last year's take.Good stuff, and further evidence that it's time to drop the "Computer" from Apple's name. Owning a 62% market share of the online music market, for instance, augurs serious sales growth. Even though that market is still in its infancy—downloads accounted for less than 2% of U.S. music sales in 2004—the iPod platform, for example, kicked in revenues of $1.4 billion in Apple's first fiscal quarter, nearly as much as it did in the previous four quarters combined. Merrill Lynch analyst Steve Milunovich predicts that the iPod business alone will hit $6.2 billion in fiscal 2006, roughly as big as all of Apple when Jobs took over.This is glossed over in the article, but it's a fact that all Apple fans should be clear on: Apple's success with the iPod is impressive, but it's also coming during the nascent stages of an industry that has yet to mature. It will be interesting to see what happens when competition makes this another commodity market. To it's credit, the author of the article actually does mention this: (Of course, the iPod's growth will eventually flatten as the devices lose their fad status. Yet the gadgets are so useful that it's easy to imagine them becoming as ubiquitous as the Walkman—of which Sony has sold 340 million.) When you look at the brief history of OS X...... which dates back to the lately-1980's, actually, when NeXT called it NeXTStep. ... you begin to realize what a remarkable accomplishment it has been for Apple—not only to build it but also to migrate millions of users to something so radically different with relatively little pain, and to improve it so dramatically and with such regularity that it has turned the endless nuisance of software support into a profit machine.I guess. Using Apple's own numbers, 14 million people are using OS X, and it's likely that most of them "migrated" from OS 9. Meanwhile, hundreds of millions of users--on billions of disparate systems--have migrated to Windows XP from Windows 9x, and they get to run 9x software natively, not in a slow virtual environment, as with OS X. I think that's more impresive. Maybe that's just me. Most tantalizing of all is scuttlebutt that three of the biggest PC makers are wooing Jobs to let them license OS X and adapt it to computers built around standard Intel chips.That is tantalizing. What? Rumor? Any comment from Jobs on that? No? Ah. Apple's core strength is to bring very high technology to mere mortals in a way that surprises and delights them and that they can figure out how to use. Software is the key to that. In fact, software is the user experience.Interesting theft of a favorite Bill Gates phrase. Overall, this is a must-read article, despite the odd errors, for all people interested in technology. [ Posted at 11:26 AM | Permalink ]
How Big Can Apple Get?Fortune:"Apple's innovation and creativity have been unleashed in a way that they haven't been in 20 years. Look at the results. This isn't a company about 5% market share; this is a company that is capable of competing with world-class competitors and achieving market shares of 65%, 70%, and even 90%."A fascinating interview with Jobs. I happen to be a Fortune subscriber, which you need to be to get the whole interview and other side-stories. I'll report back with the relevant bits soon. [ Posted at 11:14 AM | Permalink ]
Apple Form Factor Evolution 1976 through 2005There are a few mistakes (the Mac IIsi, for example, is listed as the Macintosh Classic), but overall, this Apple Form Factor Evolution 1976 through 2005 graphic is pretty neat. Also, if you're going to include the XServe, where are Apple's old UNIX-based servers from the mid-1990's? [ Posted at 8:10 AM | Permalink ]
Sunday, February 06, 2005Patriots hold off Eagles to win Super BowlPhilly.com:The New England Patriots staked their claim as the latest NFL dynasty, winning their third Super Bowl in four years with a 24-21 victory over the Eagles tonight in Super Bowl XXXIX.[ Posted at 11:23 PM | Permalink ]
Out of this World! New England Patriots are World Champions for the Third Time in Four YearsPatriots.com:The New England Patriots have won three out of the last four world championships and are easily the most dominant team of this century with their 24-21 win over the Eagles. Super Bowl XXXIX is in the books. ![]()
A Dynasty is BornBoston Globe:With MVP Deion Branch tying a Super Bowl record for receptions with 11, Brady efficiently running the offense and Rodney Harrison sparking a smothering defense, the Patriots won their ninth successive postseason game. That ties the record of Vince Lombardi's Packers of the 1960s, and there's hardly any better company a team can keep. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Three-For-All: Pats beat Eagles 24-21 to capture another Super BowlSports Illustrated:Some dynasties are pretty, some are perfect. The New England Patriots never worry about style points.[ Posted at 10:25 PM | Permalink ]
Four years. Three trophies. One dynasty: PATS WINPatriots Nation rejoice! The greatest team in football has done it again, with another nail-biter of a Super Bowl victory, 24-21 over the Philadelphia Eagles.Boston.com: TRIPLE CROWN! ESPN: Patriots 24, Eagles 21 Sports Illustrated: Repeat Defenders! ![]()
First 1,000 people to sign up for 1 year of Napster To Go get a free iriver H10 Napster:You Save: $279.95. The elegant iriver H10 5GB plays up to 150 hours of digital music. It also features a vivid color display for simple navigation and viewing of your digital photos, a rechargeable battery and a digital FM tuner.Related: iriver H10 product info Related: Pocket-lint iriver H10 review: Score: 9/10. What’s the catch? There isn’t one really. The player works well with both Mac and PCs (thanks to the drag and drop) and the size means its still small enough to tuck out of the way.Related: MisticRiver iriver H10 review: A great player. Easy to use, great sound quality, easy to navigate, 5gb of storage, on the fly playlisting, photo viewing, slideshow, color screen, great styling. Both power users and everyday consumers will enjoy using it's many features. It stacks up very well against the competition and if viewed side by side should come out on top.This looks like a smoking deal, assuming you wanted to get into Napster To Go. Something to think about, though I guess you'll want to move quickly. [ Posted at 1:34 PM | Permalink ]
Napter To Go Super Bowl commercialNapster:
"Hey, look at the cat..."
10,000 songs to fill up an iPod = $10,000 One million songs to fill up your MP3 player = $15 per month
Good stuff.
Hide the Truth, Here Comes Leander Kahney, Part TwoIt was with some reluctance that I posted about Wired reporter Leander Kahney's Jason Blair-like relationship with the truth earlier this week. As a tech journalist in my day job, I take my career very seriously. And I've been somewhat freaked out by some recent developments in my field. Kahney represents the worst of what I've seen. Still, I don't undertake a public rebuttal like that lightly. But I did it, and I understand I must suffer any consequences as a result. So far so good: I've heard nothing in the way of a reasoned defense for this guy at all, which bolsters my opinion of him. And his public "response" to my concerns--he has never answered my private emails--is even less professional than the story about which I originally complained.But before I get into that, let me make one thing perfectly clear. My problem with Kahney was only tangentially related to the subject of Kahney's article, "Hide the iPod, Here Comes Bill." In other words, the subject of iPod use at Microsoft is a good one, especially for a writer whose entire beat is Apple. No, my problem is with Kahney himself and his fact-less approach to reporting, an opinion I've honed over a year or so of encountering his articles on the Web and then reading them collected into a horrible book called "Cult of Mac." My problem is that Kahney hasn't met a positive anecdote about Apple that he doesn't like. He's the type of guy who would walk into a random Apple Store in mid-2004, ask a clerk there if the iPod's success was rubbing off on the Mac, achieve the desired response ("oh my, yes!") and then write a 3,000 words article about the iPod Halo Effect (tm). Meanwhile, Mac sales hadn't really gone up as a result of the iPod, based on actual Apple sales data from the time. But hey, this is Kahney we're talking about. Conjecture and anecdote are so much more fun than facts, especially when you've got an eager crowd of Apple fans that want to cross-post your stories in a circle-jerk of pro-Apple ecstasy. Truth be damned. Fine. I expect that sort of thing from the minority Mac cheerleader crowd. But when it comes from Wired ... My God. I subscribe to the print magazine. Have the inmates taken over the asylum? I mean, what's next? Major Mac advocates with a Microsoft axe to grind take over the top tech writing jobs at major publications like the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and Newsweek? Oh wait. Anyway. Kahney responded to criticism of his journalistic techniques, sort of, by completely sidestepping the issue. It's a classic debate technique: Turn the argument away from the accurate parts that make you look bad and redirect the argument to the accusers. Hopefully, everyone will forget what the point was. And then, if you're good at it, maybe you'll get a couple of chuckles and life goes on. Sorry, Kahney, but I don't forget what the original argument was. And at the expense of a small part of my soul, I've elected to respond to Kahney's off-base points, one by one, even though they have very little to do with the point of my criticisms. Here's what he wrote: The initial reaction to Wednesday's Wired News story about the popularity of iPods at Microsoft was fast and furious. Microsoft's fans -- both of them -- came out [with] guns blazing.See, that's funny! Paul Thurrott and Ed Bott--two Windows guys, wink-wink--had the gall to criticize me. You know, even though they were right to do so. It's particularly interesting that a guy who allegedly defends the minority portion of the computer industry would seek to discredit Ed and me because, you know, in this case, there are so few of us. After all, when it comes to who's right, its majority rules. Or something. After a few quotes from Ed and I, we get this. The reaction from these two was so furious, it reminded me of defensive, paranoid Mac fans.Two points here. First, he called Mac fans defensive and paranoid, which brought a small smile. Second, if two tech journalists ever wrote about me personally like this, I'd take it to heart. And even if I felt they were wrong, I'd at the very least address the issues they raised. His response, of course, can be seen by one and all on his blog. It's very professional, isn't it? A lot of e-mail reaction was the same, but that's not unusual...Whoa. He got "a lot of email" complaining about his horrible article too? And yet he called Ed and I "both of Microsoft's fans." Classic. Looks like he took another fact and just completely ignored it. In other words, it wasn't "both of Microsoft's fans" complaining, it was "a lot of" people complaining. And he still felt compelled to ignore those complaints. Fascinating. ... You only hear from people who are purple with rage.Put more correctly, Kahney only hears from people who are purple with rage. I actually hear regularly from people who are excited to have discovered one of my Web sites and are writing in to thank me in general, to thank me for answering a particular question or for addressing a particular topic, or to ask me a question. Yes, I do get complaints. But they are the minority. Interesting. I'd have expected the Mac fan boys to simply shower this guy with wine, women, and song. In fact, I sort of figured that was his entire point in life. And about that rage thing. There's no rage, sorry. I'm never purple. Yes, what Kahney does is wrong, and it bothers me. And I wrote about that. But don't assume I'm stalking around the house raging like the Incredible Hulk when I read something like that. It's more of a raised eyebrow or, in Kahney's case, the occasional, "Huh? What?" uttered out loud. There's no purple rage, sorry. It's called confusion. Kahney quotes a few emails, gets yet another opinion that iPod usage is less than what Kahney reported--again, by another guy, like Ed and I, who actually visits the campus regularly--and ... blows it off yet again. Remember, Kahney's not interested in anything that contradicts the point of his story. And again, that is my problem with this guy. So he finds someone who believes the story Kahney wrote. His name is Danny Ngan. He's an animator, which sounds like a job a Mac fan would appreciate. Has Ngan ever been to Microsoft's Redmond campus? No, but he's been to the Millennium Campus, 15 minutes east of the Redmond campus, and he "suggested" Kahney's estimate "might be right." Seriously. Let that sink in for a second. But my favorite bit from the Kahney "rebuttal," and let's face it, folks, he didn't rebut a thing, is his final little dig at me. Here it is, in its entirety: I'd forgotten, but Thurrott and I have some background. Last year, I countered one of his stories about HP and the iPod, which earned him some criticism from third parties like John Gruber: "Unlike Thurrott, Wired News reporter Leander Kahney actually spoke to someone at HP."That, too, is funny. But here's what really happened. Last year, at CES 2004 in January, HP announced that it was licensing the iPod from Apple, in an unexpected move that raised some legitimate questions about how HP's many other WMA-based products were going to interoperate with the HP iPod, which supports just the AAC and MP3 formats, and not WMA. I was critical of that decision. HP announced this move at CES. I was at CES, along with Keith Furman, another news editor from the magazine, and--voila!--we were scheduled to meet with HP a few different times at the show. So we asked an old friend and contact from HP there about the iPod, and were told point blank that HP was working to get WMA support into the iPod by the time HP released its device. I wrote a blurb about it--a two sentence blurb, mind you, not an article--in WinInfo and that was that. What I wrote was accurate. That's what we were told. By an HP representative. In person. To two reporters. At a trade show. During a meeting. Getting the picture? Well, history records that neither Apple nor HP ever added WMA support to the iPod. Kahney, at the time, had asked an HP representative whether they had plans to do so, and that person told him no. I--in the presence of Keith--was told by an HP representative that they would. So what happened? I think it's pretty clear now that Apple got a highly favorable deal in which HP left its customers hanging with regards to interoperability. HP later did create some horrible Media Center-like software that it shipped in late 2004, but that only works for new Media Center customers, not all of the people who currently own WMA-compatible PCs, Media Center PCs, Pocket PCs, digital media receivers, and other devices. HP was stymied by Apple. So did I "lie" about this discussion? No. But that doesn't stop Kahney from making it look like I did. And this is my favorite part. To "prove" this, he quotes a blog posting by a "third party"--that is, some joker out there on the Web who never speaks to representatives of HP, Apple, Microsoft or any other relevant company as proof. "Unlike Thurrott, Wired News reporter Leander Kahney actually spoke to someone at HP," he wrote at the time. That's a great quote. A great quote. Too bad it's not true. You know what the funniest part about all this is? When Kahney wrote his little screed about me a year ago, I tried to contact him and set the record straight. You'll be unsurprised to discover he wasn't interested. And a year later, here we are again. Mac fans probably thought that the score was Kahney 2, Thurrott 0. There's just one problem. With the truth, we have instant replay. And the refs will get this one right. So let's recap. Rather than address my legitimate issues, Kahney provided a few more anecdotes and, if I might be so bold, a few bald-faced lies. That makes him a bad guy in my book. And heck, you might think I'm bad guy too, just for brining this up. OK. I'm sorry you feel that way. But I answer complaints. I don't side-step them. And I certainly don't present opinions as facts. There's a big difference between this blog--which is, by definition, one giant opinion--and Wired News. And I feel that Wired News should either clearly label Kahney's writings as the pure conjecture and opinion they are, or simply require him to report the facts. I suspect Kahney's response to this will be silence or another round of cute name calling. Why? Because the only real way to respond to this is to own up to the truth, and Kahney is clearly incapable of doing that. [ Posted at 10:30 AM | Permalink ]
|
|
Nexus Home | Nexus Archives | Email Paul
|