More of my sites

WinInfo Daily News
SuperSite for Windows
Windows IT Pro Magazine
Connected Home
Thurrott Dot Com
Windows Weekly at TWIT


About this site

For six years, the Internet Nexus served as my technology blog, but I've since started blogging at the SuperSite Blog instead. If you're looking for the blog, please head there. --Paul



Saturday, August 27, 2005

Microsoft: Et tu, Apple?

Ah, Robert X. Cringely. How I love to read the words wafting off your personal computer (be it Mac or PC). Here's what he has to say about Apple, not Google, being Microsoft's chief threat today::
Microsoft is totally obsessed with Google because Bill Gates is obsessed with Google. In a way, Bill needs a bogeycompany like Google to motivate the troops, since they are no longer being wowed by Microsoft's stock performance.

I hope Google does pull off a couple more spectacular product feats, but I won't be all that surprised if they don't. It will take the company another five years just to mature the businesses they already have.

So it could be that Google isn't the Microsoft-killer many people -- including Gates and Ballmer -- fear the company is. Going a step further, it is even possible that Gates's conviction that he'll eventually be taken down by a startup is wrong, too.

I think Microsoft's clearest threat still comes from Apple, though not the way most people expect. Yes, Apple is about to take Microsoft to the woodshed when it comes to Internet movie distribution. Yes, Apple already super-dominates the music player market where Microsoft doesn't even really exist. But the real jewel is one Microsoft has to lose, not gain -- the PC platform, itself.
Ahem. I don't always agree with the enigmatic Mr. Cringely, but he usually delivers in the interesting reading department. And while I don't totally believe that Apple has what it takes to unseat Microsoft, God would I love to see that happen. And let me offer a bit in the way of corroborating ... opinion.

Yes, a company called Apple has been around for decades and decades, longer even than Microsoft. But it wouldn't be a mistake to call today's Apple a "startup". After all, it really began life in 1997, after the palace coup in which NeXT took over Apple and Steve Jobs returned to the company. Oh, I'm sorry. You thought that Apple bought NeXT? You're so cute. [That sensation you felt was me virtually tweaking your nose.]

So. This new Apple, the Apple we all know and love for NeXTStep 2001 (er, Mac OS X), the iPod, and iTunes, this is a relatively new company. It is much smaller and faster than the old Apple, and it makes much, much better decisions than the roasted carcass it replaced. In other words, this company is indeed a startup.

And if we accept that fact--and we should--then it isn't so crazy to believe that Microsoft might, in fact, fall to Apple. After all, Bill Gates himself believes a company like Apple is what his company should fear the most. Maybe he's right. And maybe it's all the more true because he's wasting so much time and energy worrying about that red herring Google.

Maybe.
[ Posted at 8:10 PM | Permalink ]

 

Yahoo! Music Unlimited launched

I got an email this morning about the official launch of Yahoo! Music, which was previously in beta. I haven't checked out what's changed--there's a new version of the client to download--but here's what Yahoo! has to say about it:
We're proud to announce the launch of Yahoo! Music Unlimited.

Thanks to everyone who checked us out during the beta preview period. We've added some cool, new features to supercharge your music experience. Just take a few minutes to upgrade your software. Then, start your Engine and enjoy the latest enhancements.

Revved-up home pages. Find what you need faster with redesigned home pages for Yahoo! Music Engine and Yahoo! Music Unlimited. Click here to check out the new pages on Yahoo! Music Unlimited after you upgrade your software.

Send-to-a-Friend. Share subscription music with other subscribers via IM or email. Look for "Share this page" on artist, album, and song pages.

Find it Faster. Find the most popular songs by an artist faster than ever. They're now listed right on the artist pages, or you can switch back to the classic album view. Use what works for you.

Enhanced performance. Faster, better, easier. The Yahoo! Music Engine has been tuned for greater speed and reliability to make it the ultimate music machine.
Related:
Yahoo! Music Unlimited
Install Yahoo! Music Engine
Yahoo! Music Unlimited Quick Start Guide (PDF)
Related: Yahoo! Music Unlimited FAQ
[ Posted at 8:57 AM | Permalink ]

 

Apple, Digital Music's Angel, Earns Record Industry's Scorn

New York Times (free registration required):
Two and a half years after the music business lined up behind the chief executive of Apple, Steven P. Jobs, and hailed him and his iTunes music service for breathing life into music sales, the industry's allegiance to Mr. Jobs has eroded sharply.

Mr. Jobs is now girding for a showdown with at least two of the four major record companies over the price of songs on the iTunes service.

If he loses, the one-price model that iTunes has adopted - 99 cents to download any song - could be replaced with a more complex structure that prices songs by popularity. A hot new single, for example, could sell for $1.49, while a golden oldie could go for substantially less than 99 cents.

Mr. Jobs' vision of simple, uniform pricing for songs and a policy of limiting Apple's music to Apple's devices are increasingly under attack.
This is a tough call.

For consumers, Apple's success is a mixed bag. Apple's standard 99 cent price is good, but it's refusal to allow music from other services to work on the iPod is horribly bad. (The relative low quality of songs sold on iTunes is bad too, but that's a different story.)

I'd like to see the prices remain stable and the iPod opened up. If Apple is truly out for the best interests of its customers, it will do so: It makes almost nothing on iTunes anyway, and an insane amount of money on the iPod. This change wouldn't hurt Apple at all, and it would benefit its customers and music industry partners greatly.

Come on Apple. Do the right thing.
[ Posted at 8:44 AM | Permalink ]

 

Friday, August 26, 2005

The day Rio's music died

CNET:
The Japanese company that makes the Rio line of MP3 players is shuttering its portable digital-audio division.

Rio parent D&M Holdings said on Friday that the ultra-competitive business no longer fit its market strategy.

Although it has only a small market share compared to Apple Computer's iPod, the Rio brand name has been linked with the early days of digital-music history since weathering a lawsuit from the recording industry that aimed to shut down the MP3 hardware business.

The company said it will stop producing the Rio line of products at the end of September.
While many Apple fans will foolishly celebrate this event, I find it rather sad. Aside from some personal preferences--the company's recent Carbon device is quite nice, for example--Rio played a major role in the history of the MP3 player market, having released one of the first-ever MP3 players way back in 1998. This isn't good news, honestly.
[ Posted at 6:03 PM | Permalink ]

 

Apple iPod Settlement

Apple iPod Settlement:
ALL PERSONS OR ENTITIES RESIDING IN THE UNITED STATES WHO PURCHASED OR OBTAINED A NEW FIRST, SECOND, OR THIRD GENERATION IPOD ON OR BEFORE MAY 31, 2004:

THIS NOTICE AFFECTS YOUR RIGHTS. PLEASE READ THE COMPLETE NOTICE CAREFULLY.
That's some good all-caps stuff right there.
[ Posted at 1:00 PM | Permalink ]

 

Integrating Google Talk with Google Desktop 2

Kevin takes a look at getting a Google Talk pane working in Google Desktop's Sidebar, but I couldn't get it to work until I quit both applications and restarted them. Why doesn't this "just work"?

Speaking of which, I still can't get Google Talk working from iChat, despite a few helpful emails. I'll try again today, but what I really want to do is be able to connect my iChat account with my Google Talk account (you know, so I can talk to myself).

Update: Thanks to the many people who wrote in about Google Talk via iChat. I was able to get it working (instructions here). I'm not sure what I screwed up, but I started over and it works fine.
[ Posted at 10:45 AM | Permalink ]

 

Thursday, August 25, 2005

Microsoft to support Linux with next Virtual Server

TechWorld:
Microsoft will support both Linux and Solaris in its next version of Virtual Server. But virtually, on top of Windows.

At the same time, the interim release of the product was renamed Virtual Server 2005 R2, rather than "Service Pack 1" because it will include significantly more changes than a usual service pack, said Zane Adam, director of marketing in the Windows Server division of Microsoft. The software giant typically offers service packs and interim releases called "R2s" between major updates to its server products.

Virtual Server 2005 R2 also will include 64-bit [host] support, which allows more virtual machines to run on one server. It will feature better performance for virtual machines in memory-intensive applications, as well as higher availability through new clustering technologies, Adam said.
Great. When will Microsoft support Linux in Virtual PC?
[ Posted at 12:57 PM | Permalink ]

 

DOOM movie trailer

The DOOM movie looks surprisingly like the DOOM 3 game, which is both good and bad. The first person stuff looks OK, but the monsters, curiously, look pretty bad. I'll have to see this when it comes out, but my guess is it won't be winning many awards.









[ Posted at 12:48 PM | Permalink ]

 

Wednesday, August 24, 2005

Halo heads to the movies

Bungi's Joseph Staten provides an update on Summer 2007's biggest movie:
A few months back word got out that Alex Garland had written a Halo movie script, and that Universal and 20th Century Fox were interested in double-teaming it into a film. We didn't say anything at the time because the deal still needed massaging. But today I'm happy to announce that Microsoft and the studios have worked-out all the kinks, and we're ready to get cracking on the fun, creative part of the process.

You've undoubtedly got questions: "What's the plot? Is it the same as Halo1? Halo2?" "Who's gonna play the Chief? Scratch that – who's gonna play Cortana?" "I read somewhere that the script had 'bad buzz'. Does that mean the movie's gonna suck?"

I can't respond to any "who, what, where" queries without ruining a bunch of cool surprises, (there will be Grunts - that I guarantee), but as far as the quality of the finished film goes ... well, the only thing I can say is: so far so good.

Ultimately, the Halo movie's gonna be great because it's in the best interest of Bungie and our partners at Universal and Fox to find great people to make it. People who get it. People who care about the games as much as we do. Heck, as much as you do.

Because the question isn't so much "will the movie be good?" but "will I, someone who's played both games, read the novels – you know, someone who's an unabashed Halo fan – will I think it's good?"

We sure hope so. Because we're making it just for you.
OK, I'm surprisingly pumped for this though, frankly, Half-Life and Half-Life 2 both feature much better--and more cinematic--stories. If DOOM 3 can be made into a movie, Halo should have no problems. But how about some Half-Life love?
[ Posted at 3:03 PM | Permalink ]

 

Windows 95 Preview

10 years ago today, Microsoft launched Windows 95, beginning a new era of 32-bit computing. Several months before Windows 95 shipped, I wrote a preview article about the OS for BC Link, a Benjamin Cummings newsletter aimed at educators. Here it is, along with a scan of the first page of the newsletter and the actual screenshot we used (of an early Windows 95 beta). Note that some beta features mentioned in this preview--including the PIM application--didn't make it into the final product.

Windows 95
Paul Thurrott and Gary Brent
Scottsdale Community College

If Microsoft has its way, Windows 95 will be the single biggest software release in the history of computing. Touting the upcoming 32-bit operating system as a powerful replacement for MS-DOS, Windows 3.1, and Windows for Workgroups 3.11, Microsoft spokespeople are justifiably excited. Windows 95 is a paradigm shift for the computer industry: for the first time a company with the market penetration of Microsoft has released a world-class graphical operating system. A change for the better is coming, and Windows 95 will be at the forefront.

So what makes this new release of Windows so interesting? And why does it offer educators such an exciting new platform from which to initiate the frightened new user into the world of computing?

Windows 95 offers the ultimate break from the DOS past while retaining a compatibility with DOS programs that was never possible with Windows 3.x. A DOS program can run on the Windows 95 desktop in a window or in full screen mode. Multiple DOS programs can run simultaneously, each in its own fully configurable window. In many ways, Windows 95 is the best thing that ever happened to DOS.

Windows 95 offers far more than just excellent DOS compatibility. A fully redesigned "document-centric" user-interface is easy to use and understand. The conspicuous Start button on the standard task bar begs to he pressed, revealing cascading menus containing shortcuts to programs, recently used documents, configuration options, and help. The task bar has a button for each running program, offering a quick and easy way to switch between these programs.

Gone is the suite of uninspired "manager" programs—Program Manager, File Manager and Print Manager. Windows 95 uses the powerful Explorer utility program, which offers cut-and-paste file copying (borrowing the concept from text-based cut-and-paste) and a graphic look at the contents of your computer.

Any object, be it a document, folder, program or shortcut, can be placed right the desktop. In the Windows 3.1 Program Manager there were groups that could only contain icons programs and files. In Windows 95, folders can hold these items as well as other subfolders. There is even a Recycle Bin, reminiscent of the Macintosh trashcan, used to graphically delete files.

The Windows 95 interface creates a 3D effect where all on-screen elements appear to have depth. Icons are animated. When copying a file, for example, little pieces of paper fly from one folder to another. Applications designed for Windows 3.x will automatically sport the new interface, giving them a fresh and appealing look in the new environment.

One of the more useful aspects of the new interface is that every object in Windows 95--icons, files in Explorer, the taskbar and even the desktop—displays a toolbar of related options when the user clicks on it with the mouse button. These options vary depending on the object that is selected. Right mouse-clicking on a text file, for example, displays a floating toolbar menu with options for copying, moving, creating a shortcut, deleting and renaming the file. This feature, introduced previously in Microsoft Office, is quickly learned and extremely powerful. Not sure what you can do with an on-screen object? Just right mouse-click on it and any action that can be performed on that object will appear on the floating toolbar.

Major Enhancements

Windows 95 also offers, at last, support for long filenames. The Macintosh and other graphical user interfaces have offered this feature for years, but in their own proprietary file systems, not in the classic DOS file system. Windows 95 allows names like "Letter to Brian about the Ski Trip.doc" and creates an alternate 8.3 name as well in case the file is used on an older DOS machine. This file, for example, will read as "LETTERTO.DOC" in DOS. This backward compatibility ensures that files generated in Windows 95 will run on any PC. Unfortunately, programs created before Windows 95 cannot save files with the longer filenames, although they can open them.

Other enhancements include the Network Neighborhood, where networked computers can access other computers in the network in the same graphical way they access their own hard drives. There is a Briefcase program to facilitate file synchronization between desktop and laptop computers. Built-in accessories include an excellent Personal Information Manager, an enhanced Paint program, and Wordpad, which replaces Write and Notepad. Wordpad is practically a full-featured word processing program, offering a toolbar and file compatibility with Word for Windows 6.0. Multimedia enhancements include advanced media players and support for full-motion video.

The Plug and Play (PnP) feature allows Windows 95 to automatically detect sound cards, CD-ROM drives, modems and other hardware on PnP-equipped systems that are just now being released. Most people, however do not have these systems yet and it may be years before PnP hardware is the standard. Windows 95 also offers excellent support for older computers; any hardware that the system does not automatically detect can be specified by the user.

Coming Soon ... to a Desktop Near You

Microsoft's plan is for Windows 95 to run at least as well on a 4 megabyte 386DX as Windows 3.x does. This is no easy task, as Windows 95 offers many times the functionality and usability of its forebears. Based on a recent beta release, Microsoft's claims are substantiated. Performance in Windows 95 is excellent, even with several programs running at once. Programs accessing a modem no longer slow Windows to a crawl. A program crash no longer brings the entire system down, although DOS and Windows 3.x programs can crash other older (16-bit) programs if they themselves crash. Wordpad and other 32-bit programs run in their own protected memory space, insulated from each other by the system. Even at this early stage, Windows 95 is a stable and feature-rich operating system.

Microsoft has a lot riding on the release of Windows 95, and the ever-lengthening release delays suggest that they are working to make this Windows the best ever. Windows 3.x frequently bewildered new computer users because it was non-intuitive. Windows 95 offers an obvious and accessible interface that will appeal to the power user and computer novice alike. Crossing into the world of computers has always been a big leap for the uninitiated, and interfaces like the DOS command line and Windows 3.x have done little to comfort new users. Windows 95 is that rarest of software releases: a monumental achievement featuring backward compatibility and forward-looking interface enhancements.

Gary Brent and Paul Thurrott are co-authors of the SELECT Series module on Visual Basic 3 .0 for Windows; both are currently working on a forthcoming module on Windows 95.




UPDATE: I had forgotten that I had previously posted this to the SuperSite for Windows. There are more screnshots of Windows 95 in that version of the preview.
[ Posted at 1:15 PM | Permalink ]

 

Sony finally delivers PSP System Update 2.0 to North America

If you have a Sony PSP (and aren't particularly interested in the various illegal hacks that are available online), rush over to Sony's PlayStation Web site and grab System Update 2.0, which provides a number of important features to the PSP:

- A Web browser
- 4:3 video support
- MP4 vide support
- MP4 (AAC) audio support
- Photo wallpaper support
- TIFF, GIF, PNG, and BMP image file support
- Theme support
- WPA-PSK wireless security support

There's a lot more. Go get it.
[ Posted at 1:01 PM | Permalink ]

 

Plans nixed for unified next-gen DVD

Reuters:
Groups headed by Toshiba Corp. and Sony Corp. offering competing technologies for next-generation DVDs have given up efforts to develop a unified format, the Yomiuri newspaper reported Tuesday.

For three years, the two groups have pushed to have their respective standards adopted to gain dominance in the multibillion-dollar markets for DVD players, PC drives and optical discs.

Toshiba, along with NEC Corp. and Sanyo Electric Co., has been promoting HD-DVD, while Sony (Research) and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., the maker of Panasonic brand products, have been developing a technology known as Blu-ray.

The two groups have held negotiations on unifying their formats to persuade consumers to shift to advanced discs and to promote industry growth.

But negotiations fell through as neither side yielded, and time ran out to develop a format before the launch of new products from both groups, the newspaper said.
Boobs.

This is a problem that will affect virtually all consumers. It's hard to understate how badly this kind of thing affects industry and standards growth. Even Apple's success with the iPod and iTunes has had a similar stagnating effect on the growth of online music, which still accounts for just a small percentage of all music sold. These companies should hold off on next-gen DVD until a standard can be agreed on. There's absolutely no reason these devices "have" to ship this year.
[ Posted at 12:50 PM | Permalink ]

 

FOSS word processors compared: OOo Writer, AbiWord, and KWord

News Forge:
OpenOffice.org receives most of the attention among free and open source (FOSS) office suites, but users shouldn't forget that free software includes at least two other word processors: AbiWord, part of a projected GNOME Office, and KWord, part of the KOffice suite. From their inception, both have been playing catch-up with OpenOffice.org's Writer. But now, after several years of development, AbiWord and KWord are both reaching early maturity. How do Writer, AbiWord, and KWord compare?

I compared the three programs using some of the more common features of word processors as evaluation criteria:

* Interface
* Styles
* Templates
* Adding objects
* Bulleted and numbered lists
* Page layout, frames, and sections
* Headers and footers
* Tables
* Indexes and tables of contents
* Footnotes and endnotes
* File import and export
* Unique features

The final results give an encouraging snapshot of the current state of free software word processors, while also showing how far each has to go in some areas.

Given the history and resources behind OpenOffice.org Writer, its victory in a review of features is not surprising. Neither AbiWord nor KWord should be the first choice for long documents, like manuals or doctoral theses. Still, they might do in a pinch, and both are suitable for daily use by students or office workers. Although AbiWord and KWord lack Writer's formidable array of options, they now have solid foundations to build on in many areas of word processing and document design. If they can add features without sacrificing response times, both AbiWord and KWord could challenge Writer's supremacy in a few more releases.
This sort of triggered a latent memory for me, so I looked it up. I mentioned AbiWord in WinInfo over six years ago. How cool is that? I just grabbed the latest version for Windows to see how far along its come, and it's actually quite good for something so small, lean, and free.
[ Posted at 12:36 PM | Permalink ]

 

Linux distribution review-o-rama

For some reason, a bunch of Linux distribution reviews were posted in various places today. Let's take a look:

OS News - Review: Ubuntu v5.04 Hoary
Ubuntu is described as "a free, open source operating system that starts with the breadth of Debian and adds regular releases (every six months), a clear focus on the user and usability (it should "Just Work", TM) and a commitment to security updates with 18 months of support for every release. Ubuntu ships with the latest Gnome release as well as a selection of server and desktop software that makes for a comfortable desktop experience off a single installation CD."

Ubuntu is good enough for me to continue using for a while, possibly indefinitely if the next release continues the same pattern of improvement that version 5.04 had over its predecessor. With what seems to be true dedication to the open-source market, Canonical has a very solid operating system with Ubuntu, and I'll gladly recommend it to anyone looking for a great beginner's system.
Not to beat this to death, but Ubuntu is still, by far, my favorite Linux distribution.

Distro Reviews -
Freespire 5.0: Linspire Freed
A free Linspire clone has hit the FTP mirrors. DistroWatch reports 'Freespire is a new Linux distribution, a free edition of Linspire with all proprietary components and trademarks removed. The distribution comes with a free repository of over 1,500 packages available via apt-get and Synaptic. This initial release functions as a live CD only and serves as a proof of concept. It certainly looks like an interesting idea: combining the benefits of Linspire's excellent usability and hardware auto-configuration with a free repository of Debian packages.'

It is far too early to make any judgments on Freespire. All I can say about this early release is that it has potential. It has a long way to go to win me over. I think for now I'd stick with the free Linspire 5.0 Live CD.
As Chris Pirillo would say, this "looks like ass." But it's worth watching.

Related: Freespire

News Forge - Review: Underground Desktop
Underground Desktop is a GNU/Linux distribution, based on Debian-unstable, that touts itself as being fast and easy to install. Certainly, it attains the former goal better than many distributions, but this beta software remains very rough around the edges.

The standard procedure for Underground Desktop after an install is to boot straight to a full-blown K Desktop Environment -- as root. I was nearly in shock. Haven't we seen enough security problems with Windows users running as Administrator all the time? Didn't we learn our lesson?

In my experience, Underground Desktop is far from being user-friendly, and it contains numerous problems that need solving. It was no joy ride to get working, and it wasn't significantly faster than other distributions.
Another uninspiring effort, it seems.

Tux Machines - SUSE Linux 10.0 Beta 2 Report
The "Lizard Blizzard" continues as OpenSUSE released Beta 2 of the upcoming SUSE Linux a coupla days ago.

Most of the changes appear to have taken place beneath the hood, updating software versions, squashing bugs, kernel patches and the like ... [also] the koffice icon on the desktop has been replaced by an OpenOffice.org icon.

For a more complete report of the goodies in SUSE Linux by OpenSUSE, consult my previous report.
SUSE has potential, though I'm a bit leary of Novell for obvious reasons. I remain unimpressed with KDE, however, though GNOME is available in SUSE as well. Anyway. SUSE looks solid overall.
[ Posted at 12:12 PM | Permalink ]

 

Google Enters IM Market with Google Talk

Me, in WinInfo:
Internet search giant Google—which is quickly becoming a leading online media company—today launched Google Talk, an instant messaging (IM) solution. Based on the Jabber IM standard, Google Talk can communicate with users of Jabber, iChat, and Trillian, and Google says it will soon open up the tool to users of MSN Messenger, Yahoo Messenger, and AOL Instant Messenger (AIM).

Google Talk is open to the public and is free, without ads, and requires a Gmail user account. Users without a Gmail account will receive one when they sign up for Google Talk, the company says, assuming they don't mind providing Google with their cellphone number in order to prevent people from squatting on valuable email addresses.

Compared to other IM solutions, Google Talk is lean both graphically and feature-wise. While the system offers text and voice chatting and clean, uncluttered interface, it does not offer any video features and can't be used as a telephony solution. However, Google's products are perpetually in beta and are often upgraded quickly. The company says that its rapid-fire update policy and adherence to Internet standards will set Google Talk apart from the competition.
So this looks pretty good. I have, however, had some serious issues getting it to work with iChat AV. If I understand this correctly, you can't actually chat with iChat AV users from Google Talk using the iChat network. Instead, the iChat user has to have configured a Jabber account. That's too bad, but hopefully will be fixed.

Also, there are serious problems configuring iChat to use your Google Gmail/Talk account via its support for Jabber. This site has instructions for making it work, but I haven't tried it yet.

If you want to test Google Talk, drop me a note and I'll send you a Gmail invite. I have 49 (of 50, heh) left. I don't check Gmail as often as my main account, so it might take a few hours.

Finally: Where is the Google Talk panel for Google's Sidebar?

Related: Google Talk (Windows only)
[ Posted at 12:04 PM | Permalink ]

 

Tuesday, August 23, 2005

Tiger not yet a roaring success

Houston Chronicle:
When Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger shipped in April, the rest of the media fawned over its hot new features and made you feel that Tiger was a must-have upgrade.

While I was impressed with many of its features, I suggested waiting for the inevitable bug-fix releases. My last words were, "I'll let you know as soon as I feel that Tiger is 'safe and sane' for the average user. Until then, you're probably better off without it."

Four months and two minor updates later — the current release is version 10.4.2 — it's time to take another look.

So, is it safe yet? The answer is a qualified "maybe."

I read MacFixIt's recently released Troubleshooting Mac OS X 10.4.2 Special Report, and now I'm not so sure ... that most of the problems appear to be behind us now.

You really should read the MacFixIt report, which includes much more than just polls, including descriptions of dozens of issues users have encountered while installing or updating Tiger, plus strategies and fixes that have worked for other users.

While the trend is moving in the right direction, I still don't like your odds. So, if you haven't already upgraded to Tiger, you might want to consider waiting just a little bit longer.
OK, I'm impressed. Bob LeVitus is absolutely on the list of journalists who I feel have been compromised by their relationships with Apple (others include David Pogue, Walta Mossberg, and Gene Steinberg). However, this is far more cautious than even I feel comfortable with. Besides, where did this data come from? Did one person have a problem with spontaneously unmounting Firewire drives, so it made the list?
[ Posted at 11:39 AM | Permalink ]

 

OpenOffice.org 2.0 reviewed

Search Enterprise Linux:
As an OpenOffice.org and StarOffice trainer, I teach a lot of one-day classes on the core software features. As I introduce the program and then word processor (Writer), spreadsheet (Calc) and presentation maker (Impress), I teach students how to deal with the oddities of each application before we get into the primary lessons.

My first half hour of each section is gone.

The lessons on making the icon bigger, how to get to a different toolbar, how the option for wrapping Calc spreadsheet cells doesn't actually have the word "wrap" in it; my shtick on how the most important buttons in Impress are the tiniest -- all gone. I'll need to figure out some new jokes for my classes.

This makes me happy. Not only can I spend more time teaching new OpenOffice.org users how to really enjoy the software and use the more powerful features, but the changes in OpenOffice.org 2.0 means someone has been thinking about more than just spreadsheet rows. There are some smart changes in this release.

Just to be clear: OpenOffice.org 2.0 isn't out yet; I'm reviewing the 1.9.122 release. Release date for 2.0? I'm not sure. Indications are late summer, but it's late summer now. Check the OpenOffice.org Web site or subscribe to the announcements list. That's what I'll be doing.

This article is a look at what I like, as an instructor and user, about the new OpenOffice.org 2.0.
This is a great review--really, an overview--of the new features in OpenOffice.org and one written by that rarest of individuals: Someone who's actually familiar with previous and current versions of the product.

Related: GetOpenOffice.org
Related: Download OpenOffice.org 2.0 snapshot builds
[ Posted at 9:28 AM | Permalink ]

 

Monday, August 22, 2005

Google Updates Desktop Search with Sidebar

Me, in WinInfo:
On Monday, Google updated its perpetually-in-beta Google Desktop Search application to version 2, adding an intriguing and extensible new component called Sidebar. Like the Windows Vista feature it emulates, the Google Sidebar presents discrete panes of information that can be filled with various bits of functionality. The base Sidebar, for example, includes panes dedicated to email, news, photos, weather, and related features.

The new Sidebar component is optional in Google Desktop Search 2 and can be replaced by a deskbar component, which sits in the Windows taskbar, or a floating deskbar, which hovers over the desktop. Users can optionally choose to use the application's advanced features, which sends information about the Web sites you visit to Google so that the company can provide personalized services. Google Desktop Search and the Sidebar do not, however, display any ads, and Google says that a controversial Web caching feature from previous versions is now disabled by default.
I installed the Sidebar this morning, and it's not horrible. But it's clearly a beta: When you come back to the desktop from a game that uses a different resolution than the desktop, all the Sidebar panels resize and then don't go back to the correct settings, which stinks.

Related: Google Desktop 2 Beta
Related: Download plug-ins
[ Posted at 5:31 PM | Permalink ]

 

Digital music king may lose crown

CNN.com:
Enjoy it while it lasts.

That is the message to Apple Computer CEO Steve Jobs from almost every other company in the digital music space vying for consumer attention after several years of domination by the iPod and iTunes.

Today, Apple commands 80 percent of the MP3 player market and 75 percent of online music sales. But even as analysts predict another massive holiday sales season for the company this year, many believe Apple's reign will last only another 12-18 months before the playing field levels out.

Piper Jaffray senior research analyst Gene Munster says, "It's safe to say that nobody can sustain an 80 percent market share in a consumer electronics business for more than two or three years. It's pretty much impossible."

Privately, record company executives say they can't wait. Not because they want to see Apple stumble, but because a less dominant Apple means a more robust market for digital music.
It's not clear to me that Apple "must" falter. I've pointed out mistakes the company has made--lack of a subscription service, no compatibility with WMA--but these are easily reversible at any point.
[ Posted at 5:23 PM | Permalink ]

 

J Allard Xbox 365 Chat Transcript

Microsoft Xbox guru J Allard recently chatted with over 2000 people in a Microsoft community chat room. Some choice quotes from the transcript:
If you have Media Center [PC] you will be able to stream standard and high definition video [to the Xbox 360].

While we designed [the Xbox 360 as] a no compromises game system, a huge percentage of our customers are not like the folks in this chat room. Recognize that more than 75 percent of the folks on Xbox have not played Halo. By introducing the core system we are sending a signal to the market that we are committed to this part of the market just like with the Xbox 360 premium bundle that we are committed to you [the hard core gamers]. The significance of this message can not be understated. Many of the publishing and retail partners want our commitment to grow the market. And as you have heard from us in our press conferences and such we are very committed to growing the market.

It's going to be interesting to see how and if a high def format for movies plays out. When we designed the the initial Xbox many people asked if SACD [Super Audio CD] or DVD Audio would be the successor to the CD format for music. As everyone knows, the real successor was MP3 and digital distribution with things like Napster, iPod, and MSN Music. While there is a lot of talk about this in the industry it will be interesting to see what the exact future of this is for movies. Of course I think there will be a need for higher capacity optical media for storage applications. We prefer HD-DVD to Blu-Ray in terms of the flexibility it offers to different applications as well as the infrastructure costs to the market.

Backwards compatibility [with Xbox 1 games] will require a hard drive. The good news is that the core system owners can upgrade if they deside to update at a later date.
[ Posted at 4:54 PM | Permalink ]

 



Nexus Home | Nexus Archives | Email Paul
Copyright © 2001-2008 Paul Thurrott. All Rights Reserved.