![]() |
More of my sitesWinInfo Daily News
|
About this siteFor six years, the Internet Nexus served as my technology blog, but I've since started blogging at the SuperSite Blog instead. If you're looking for the blog, please head there. --Paul Monday, August 27, 2007Is Google About To Stab Apple in the Back With Google Phone?ParisLemon:Reports out of India suggest that Google will be releasing their rumored "Google Phone" worldwide in two weeks. The report is questionable for a number of reasons, the first of would probably have to be that it is only coming out of India, and the second of which is the unlikelihood that Google would stab their tech buddy Apple in the back by releasing a phone so soon after iPhone.I love this assertion. How, exactly, are Google and Apple "tech buddies"? The only "partnership" we've seen to date is a single uninteresting Google Maps application on the iPhone that doesn't even all of the features of the Web version. (Gmail support in iPhone Mail doesn't count; it's just POP3.) If you really look at it, there's more and better Yahoo! stuff on the iPhone than Google stuff. And yet, we've been treated to all kinds of Apple/Google rumors, none of which were ever true. (Two examples: Google would buy Apple, and Apple would switch .Mac mail to Google Apps/Gmail.) It's amazing to me how pervasive this baloney is. Just because someone says something doesn't make it true, no matter how often its repeated around the blogosphere. Anyway... It does seem to be fairly well assumed that Google is going to release a cellphone at some point in the future - and that it might even be free thanks to advertisements that would run on it. Also fairly likely is a phone from Microsoft, which may or may not be a ZunePhone.So, lots of good speculation there. (He even doubles up on the speculation in the first sentence, which might just be a record.) Let's forget about the Microsoft stuff, since they've been doing Windows Mobile since it was first called Windows CE back in 1996. I'm all for a gPhone or whatever they'd call it, as I'm a huge consumer of Google services. I have zero interest in advertising-based clients, however, and would gladly pay a monthly fee so as to not deal with that. But again, I have to wonder. Where do these rumors come from? And where does the rumor end and the truth begin? The rest of this post drives right off the deep end (apparently Nokia, Motorola and others are just going to lie down and die) so it gets pretty silly. But I'm intrigued by the possibility of a gPhone. Really intrigued. [ Posted at 10:41 AM | Permalink ]
Wednesday, August 22, 2007Zoho Takes Writer Offline, Adds CommentsZoho:Zoho customers can now work with their Zoho Writer documents while offline via the new Go Offline feature in Zoho Writer. Additionally, Zoho Writer's new Comments feature lets users add contextual comments to their personal and shared documents.So I had never heard of Zoho, but this is quite a bit more sophisticated than Google Docs from what I can see. I'm really coming around to the notion of Web-based productivity suites, and Google Gears (or something similar) might just be the answer to the offline issue. Interesting stuff. [ Posted at 11:52 AM | Permalink ]
Tuesday, August 21, 2007Google tries to do the right thingOfficial Google Blog:To recap: we decided to end the Google Video download to own/rent (DTO/DTR) program, and are now refocusing our Google Video engineering efforts. The week before last, we wrote to Google Video DTO/DTR program customers to let them know that videos they'd already bought would no longer be playable.So, that's nice. But this still highlights, painfully, the problems DRM can cause. Thanks, Bob. Related: Google kills paid Google Videos, open DRM Pandora's Box Labels: Google [ Posted at 1:04 PM | Permalink ]
Wednesday, August 15, 2007Google Pack Adds StarOfficeThe Unofficial Google OS Blog:Google Pack, the collection of applications recommended by Google, includes a new software: StarOffice, an office suite developed by Sun. In 2000 Sun released StarOffice's source code, which became the foundation of OpenOffice.org, an open source project sponsored by Sun.Interesting indeed. Tipped off by the same blog post, Mary Jo offers up some info of her own: I asked Sun what gives. I received the following response from a spokesperson:So here I am in France, it's 10:00 am and there's nothing yet (probably because it's still 1:00 am in California). Waiting... waiting... :)“Sun is soon going to make an important announcement regarding Sun’s StarOffice software, and it is related to the questions you asked (which was, “What’s up with Google distributing StarOffice for free”?). The announcement is likely to have significant impact in the industry about the adoption of Open Document Format and availability of free MS Office-compatible comprehensive office suite.” BTW... I reviewed Google Pack when it first came out and wasn't impressed. It looks like some things have changed. Maybe it's time for a re-visit. Labels: Google [ Posted at 4:00 AM | Permalink ]
Monday, August 13, 2007Google kills paid Google Videos, open DRM Pandora's BoxBig deal, right? Well check out the fine print:After August 15, 2007, you will no longer be able to view your purchased or rented videos.What?? This is, of course, the nightmare of DRM come to life. Even content that you "purchase" (i.e. not rented content) isn't actually owned by you and it can be taken away. Sorry, but that's ludicrous. Labels: Digital media, Google, Internet [ Posted at 11:41 AM | Permalink ]
Friday, August 10, 2007A simple way to get more storage from GoogleI just noticed that my Gmail account went from 2.8 GB to 28 GB of capacity. Here's why:the Picasa team is pleased to tell you that we [are] rolling out extra storage that you can purchase to use across several Google products (today, Picasa Web Albums and Gmail; soon, other applications like Google Docs & Spreadsheets). That will help make storage really useful, like letting you upload lots of full resolution images to Picasa Web Albums.I had previously purchased 25 GB of storage space from Picasa, so it's been added in with my Gmail storage space. Yippee. I was hoping they'd do this. And... they've lowered prices already, as expected. Nice. Labels: Google [ Posted at 7:47 AM | Permalink ]
Wednesday, July 18, 2007Google Earth's DownsideA disturbing video highlighting the problems with Google's omnipresence these days. Yikes:Google's cameras are everywhere these days. They photograph us from space, and now even from street level in some cities. This got filmmaker Scott Blaszak musing about how Google's technology could cause big trouble in the wrong hands. Here's his fictional video short Happy Anniversary.Those that do not should have their heads examined. Granted, the actual premise of the video--that Google used satellite imagery in multiple locations from exact dates required by the stalker--is beyond far-fetched. But as with a Michael Moore film, the point is made, if in overly-dramatic fashion. Creepy. Labels: Google [ Posted at 9:17 AM | Permalink ]
Tuesday, July 10, 2007Putting Google On Your PhoneA fantastic post from Google Blogoscoped:Reto Meier of the Radioactive Yak blog recently turned his cell phone into a “Google Phone,” and he’ll explain how you can do the same through the different mobile-optimized sites and Java clients Google offers.Virtually all of this stuff works great on my Q. A few of them work well on the iPhone too, and of course the iPhone has a slick Google Maps application built-in. I certainly have spent a lot of time ensuring that most of these are in my phones. BTW: Google Reader on the iPhone may be the Safari killer app. RSS just looks great on the iPhone. Labels: Google, iPhone, Mobile [ Posted at 10:05 AM | Permalink ]
Wednesday, July 04, 2007iPhone observation: Mail application, Take TwoSo my previous post about the Mail application was a bit limited, by definition: I'm trying to wrap the iPhone around what I need, not cover every single feature. However, I did get a number of interesting email replies, so I thought I'd follow up on what I've learned, both from readers and from the local Apple Store, where I spent the morning with the concierge.The iPhone supports a few email services, if not natively, then at least specially. These are, in order of sophistication, from best to worst: Yahoo! Mail. Unique to the iPhone, Yahoo! Mail is a special form of "push" email that is described as being IMAP-like, which is excellent if you use this service. Yahoo! will literally push server-based changes--like new folders, new email, and so on--to the device automatically every fifteen minutes. .Mac. Users of Apple's .Mac email can take advantage of IMAP technology, which is a first-rate experience, but not as sophisticated as push email: Basically, the iPhone has to manually sync with the server on a set schedule (every fifteen minutes by default). AOL. AOL uses IMAP on the iPhone. I finally did get this working, and from what I can tell, the big advantage is that the iPhone only requires your name, user name, and password, and then configures the server settings automatically. Any IMAP email service. If you are using a third party email service that supports IMAP, and have access to the server information you need to configure it, iPhone is good to go. This includes, by the way, the supposed "Exchange support" that's advertised in the Mail Settings on the device: Exchange only works if its configured for IMAP. Gmail. Though Google's email service is listed as one of the top-tier choices in the Add Account section of Mail Settings, it's just POP access. The only advantage is that you don't have to look up the server settings; the iPhone will do that automatically when you enter your name, email address, and password. As I noted in the last post, this is really unsophisticated and doesn't meet my needs. Any POP email service. If you are using a third party email service that supports POP, and have access to the server information you need to configure it, iPhone is good to go. Note that POP email is unsophisticated but better than nothing. Web mail. You can also access any Web-based email service, like Gmail, Windows Live Hotmail, Yahoo! Mail, or whatever, through Safari, which ranges from OK to completely unacceptable depending on the service and various browser compatibility issues. I've found Gmail access to be decent (but not "good") via Gmail Mobile in Safari, and I'll certainly use that before I ever configure it for POP. Basically, if you use Yahoo!, you're all set: Yahoo! Mail on the iPhone is a first class experience. I'd describe .Mac mail, AOL Mail, and any other IMAP-based email as a second class experience. Everything else is a joke, or at best better than nothing. In my particular case, I'm stuck using Gmail Mobile via the Web, which is what I was doing on the Windows Mobile-based Motorola Q, though Google does offer a (lousy) Java-based Gmail client on some smart phones too. So it's basically the same experience, with some pros and cons. On the iPhone, the screen is bigger and nicer looking, which is good. But you can't download attachments, which is terrible. Anyway. Mail, like much of the functionality on the iPhone, remains a mixed bag, unless you happen to be a Yahoo! Mail user. Labels: Apple, Google, iPhone, Mobile [ Posted at 12:07 PM | Permalink ]
Tuesday, July 03, 2007iPhone observation: Mail application decent, but doesn't deliver what I wantWhile the iPhone's email application, Mail, benefits greatly from the large screen of the device, the actual email support it delivers is sub-part, even by smart phone standards. (Look to Windows Mobile's Pocket Outlook Email for an obvious comparison.) Most of the email support is POP-based, though those lucky enough to have IMAP support can at least take advantage of that system's work-on-the-server approach. (.Mac mail support in the iPhone is a bit better, though that won't help most users.) Obviously, the best mobile email is text-based, and here the iPhone does a great job of displaying messages with its gorgeous screen and crisp fonts. Now if we could only do things like download and edit Word documents and not just view them. And why can't I save JPEG attachments to the device and use them for wallpaper? Too obvious?One Mail problem points to an obvious design flaw in the iPhone: If you click on a hyperlink in Mail, the link opens in Safari. But if you want to get back to email, there's no Back button messing up the device design. So you have to click the Home button and then manually tap the on-screen Mail icon to go back to your mail, and the message you were reading. Another problem with Mail relates to one of the iPhone's many inconsistencies: If you're viewing a list of messages in your Inbox and rotate the screen to landscape mode, the display doesn't swivel with you. (This is true in some but not all other lists in the device: When you swivel while viewing songs in iPod, the view switches to Cover Flow; when you swivel while viewing videos in iPod, the view doesn't switch. Inconsistent.) The view doesn't swivel when you're viewing email messages or attached Word documents either. Both would benefit from this possibility, but because the iPhone does this in other places, it's bewildering when it doesn't work. Apple makes a big deal out of the screen rotation stuff: It should work consistently everywhere. Ultimately, I was hoping that the iPhone would have a killer native Gmail application, but really all it has is a POP-based Gmail client. That's useless to me because I organize my email up on the server using Gmail's amazing labels-based technology, which treats email like a database table which you can access using different filtered views. This stuff doesn't get pulled down to any client, POP or otherwise, so Google and/or Apple would need to actually do some work to make the iPhone a first-class Gmail citizen. I desperately want a smart phone that can do this. The iPhone isn't it. Update: I've written a follow-up to this post which could be of interest: iPhone observation: Mail application, Take Two Labels: Apple, Google, iPhone, Mobile [ Posted at 5:09 PM | Permalink ]
Friday, June 29, 2007Microsoft to Google: Learn from our antitrust lessonNews.com:A Microsoft attorney says the company has learned how to deal with antitrust regulators and that Google could glean a thing or two from the experience.I couldn't agree more. Google will absolutely find itself talking to regulators in the days ahead. [ Posted at 2:05 PM | Permalink ]
Tuesday, June 19, 2007iPhoneI've written up an iPhone preview for Connected Home and the SuperSite for Windows, but it won't be up for a few days. In the meantime, I'll at least mention that I do plan to get one. This is a recent development, and it actually came out of a discussion I was having with my wife about migrating to Gmail. (We don't usually talk tech as she's "normal," but I thought she could benefit from doing so.) Anyway, I mentioned Gmail interaction with various smart phones and noted how that would be getting better with native Google apps for phones, especially the iPhone. She asked if I was getting one. To that moment, I can honestly say I wasn't planning on doing so at all. And I told her that. But from that second on, I realized that, yeah, I pretty much have to do this. With the full understanding that the lack of a real keyboard and the non-availability of massive amounts of storage will limit its appeal somewhat, yeah. Yeah, I just have to get one. Obviously.Labels: Apple, Google, iPhone, iPod, Mobile [ Posted at 11:09 AM | Permalink ]
Monday, June 11, 2007Google Gets Low Grade From Privacy WatchdogIt's only a matter of time before Google's pervasiveness combine with its outright hostility toward privacy to cause some kind of backlash. The latest example of an alarming trend, courtesy of the Associated Press:Google Inc.'s privacy practices are the worst among the Internet's top destinations, according to a report released Saturday by Privacy International.[ Posted at 8:45 AM | Permalink ]
Wednesday, May 30, 2007Google Goes Offline With 'Gears'Information Week:At the San Jose Convention Center on Thursday, as Google Developer Day 2007 gets underway in the U.S., Google engineering VP Jeff Huber plans to demonstrate how one of his company's online applications, Google Reader, can be used without an Internet connection.Interesting. If this works, it will remove a key complaint about Google's Web-based approach. [ Posted at 8:08 PM | Permalink ]
Wednesday, May 23, 2007Google turns the page… in a bad wayDavid Ulevitch at OpenDNS sheds some light on something that should, but probably won't, disturb a lot of people:Google and Dell have teamed up to install some software on Dell computers that borders on being spyware. I say spyware because it’s hard to figure out what it is and is even harder to remove.Worth reading. Worth debating. Worth worrying about. Yes, OpenDNS has a vested interest, of sorts, in this game. But this is bad news and yet another indication that Google's "Do No Evil" mantra is marketing horse pucky. Thanks, Matt. [ Posted at 9:01 AM | Permalink ]
Wednesday, April 04, 2007Google Desktop for Mac (Beta)Google:Google Desktop is a desktop search application that gives you easy access to information on your Mac and from the web. Desktop makes searching your own email, files, music, photos, and more as easy as searching the web with Google.Interesting. I've been testing the new version of Google Desktop for Windows for the past several weeks, and it has some features that are missing (and desirable) on the Mac side, including a Sidebar replacement that hosts Dashboard-like Gadgets. But because its onscreen all the time by default (like Vista's Sidebar), it's much more useful and interesting than Dashboard. I wonder if that's coming. Related: Google Desktop for Mac (Google's Mac Blog) [ Posted at 9:18 AM | Permalink ]
Sunday, April 01, 2007Google TiSPIs anything lamer than corporate April Fools jokes? I don't think so:Google TiSP (BETA) is a fully functional, end-to-end system that provides in-home wireless access by connecting your commode-based TiSP wireless router to one of thousands of TiSP Access Nodes via fiber-optic cable strung through your local municipal sewage lines.Etc. Hah. Hahhaha. Spare me. Related: Gmail Paper Labels: Google, Humor, Internet [ Posted at 9:39 AM | Permalink ]
Monday, March 19, 2007Import mail into Gmail with the Gmail LoaderThis look useful:So, you've turned your back on traditional mail clients and get your mail fix via Gmail these days. The only problem is getting to all those old message that are stuck in your old email client. One way to stuff that old mail into your shiny and capacious Gmail account is to use Mark Lyon's Gmail Loader. Labels: Google [ Posted at 4:59 PM | Permalink ]
Friday, March 16, 2007Europe exec confirms Google PhoneGoogle Blog:The head of Google in Spain and Portugal has confirmed that Google is working on a mobile phone. "Some of the time the engineers are dedicated to developing a mobile phone," Isabel Aguilera is quoted as saying on the Spanish news Web site Noticias.com.Related: Exec Confirms Google Phone, which adds: Google's mobile initiatives were designed for developing countries, suggesting that a Google Phone might not be a competitor to the Apple iPhone. Labels: Google [ Posted at 2:26 PM | Permalink ]
Thursday, March 15, 2007Is Google's Success A Reason To Stop Using It?TechDirt:Despite their best efforts, Google's search engine rivals still aren't making much of a dent in the company's commanding lead in the space. Apparently, their latest strategy is to convince users that Google's position allows it to wield a frightening amount of control over the world's information. Of course, they don't just come out and say this; rather, a marketing firm hired by Yahoo and Ask has started promoting a site that cryptically warns users to "Stop The Online Information Monopoly". It warns that it's only a matter of time before Google has the power of mind control, and that the way to stop this is to try a rival search engine. The problem is that Google really doesn't exhibit the ominous behavior that this marketing campaign claims it does. Consumers do have choice when it comes to search engines, and for the most part, they're choosing Google.Actually, there are plenty of reasons to distrust Google. But this is an interesting argument, and I bet Microsoft could offer up some insight into the perils of success. For some reason this reminds me of R.E.M. fans charging the band with "selling out" after Michael Stipe began enunciating lyrics and they went mainstream. Except of course that Google is evil and R.E.M. isn't. [ Posted at 9:16 AM | Permalink ]
Google to adopt new privacy measuresAssociated Press:Google Inc. is adopting new privacy measures to make it more difficult to connect online search requests with the people making them — a thorny issue that provoked a showdown with the U.S. government last year.I understand why Google would need to analyze search records. However, I don't get why the company would ever need to retain personally identifiable information like IP addresses. How exactly does this help the company improve it's services? [ Posted at 8:49 AM | Permalink ]
Wednesday, March 14, 2007Viacom Sues Google for $1 Billion, Cites Copyright InfringementMe, in WinInfo:In a widely expected move, media conglomerate Viacom on Wednesday announced that it was suing Google for $1 billion over rampant copyright infringement on Google's YouTube video site. Viacom says that Google has shown "brazen disregard" for its multiple requests to have content from such Viacom entities as "The Daily Show with Jon Stewart," "South Park," and even movies like "An Inconvenient Truth" removed from YouTube.So as much as I hate to back a huge conglomerate like Viacom, they're clearly right: YouTube is making money off the backs of content owners and needs to be stopped. Obviously. Related: 18 Reasons why Google and YouTube are Guilty of Copyright Infringement [ Posted at 2:36 PM | Permalink ]
Wednesday, March 07, 2007Read and write support for Google Calendar checked inIf you listen to my Windows Weekly podcast, you know I've been working with various calendar solutions lately. One of the issues I've had is that, while Google Calendar is actually excellent, you can't get notifications on anything but the primary calendar (duh) and if you subscribe to Google calendars with most desktop apps, you can't edit events or get reminders. (There are some exceptions: Outlook 2007 lets you set reminders for Google Calendar-based events.)Anyway. Check out this wonderful update from the Sunbird/Lightning teams at Mozilla (where Sunbird is Mozilla's standalone calendar app and Lightning is an add-on for Thunderbird that adds calendaring to Mozilla's email application): A very nice checkin has just hit the Mozilla source code. Support for read and write of Google Calendar. So now both Lightning and Sunbird has support for Google Calendar. Please note that the support currently is minimal but it's being worked on. It's being build as an extension.Oh bless you Mozilla. Bless you. FYI: I did end up paying for SyncMyCal, which does work quite well if you're an Outlook user. [ Posted at 1:43 PM | Permalink ]
Wednesday, February 28, 2007Microsoft Hits Snooze at Google's "Wake-Up Call"Me, in WinInfo:Microsoft Chief Software Architect Ray Ozzie yesterday described the company's most recent Internet-based competitor, Google, as a "wake-up call." Labels: Google, Internet, Microsoft [ Posted at 9:56 AM | Permalink ]
Friday, February 23, 2007Google Apps grows upGoogle Blog:I'm excited to tell you that our baby has finally graduated and is entering the business world. Google Apps Premier Edition is a new version designed to take on all the challenges presented by businesses with complex IT needs. For $50 per account per year, you get the whole Google Apps package plus many new business-oriented features, including access to our APIs and partner solutions (so it’s easy to integrate with existing systems), conference room scheduling for Calendar, 10GB of inbox storage, extended business hours phone support, and mobile access to your email on BlackBerry devices (just in case you can't get enough at the office).I'm still struck by this weird feeling that Google will become the next Microsoft: Huge, used by billions, feared because of its power, and, ultimately, maybe even Evil to the core. Microsoft has fixed most of its problems, of course, but Google is on the way up. It's so controversial, in fact, that I fully expect Google to join technologies like Linux and the Mac in the "fanatic sweepstakes," assuming that hasn't happened already. It seems like there's a lot more going on in Google-ville than with many other technologies, and it's changing all the time. But two things amaze me: First, no one is really all that concerned about Google's power, though they should be. Secondly, Google's solutions are often not best of breed. Google Talk is a joke, and anyone who's looked at Yahoo Mail Beta will agree that it's a million times nicer than Gmail. It's not even close. I wonder why Yahoo doesn't evoke the same feelings as does Google. And seriously, is anyone sane actually using Google Docs? Seriously? [ Posted at 9:50 AM | Permalink ]
Wednesday, February 14, 2007Gmail finally really open to everyoneNews.com:Nearly three years after Gmail was first released, the free Web-based e-mail from Google is being opened up for anyone in the world. Beginning Wednesday, everyone and their mother can sign up instead of having to get an invite from a Gmail-using friend. Google has been phasing out the invitation restriction geographically, with total general availability offered in Europe last week and in North America, South America and Asia this week. The service is still in beta test mode, however.I've been using Gmail as my primary email account for quite a while, and it appears to work well, at least through a real email application like Outlook. I have my concerns about Google, however, and then there's Yahoo Mail, which is an absolutely gorgeous Web-based email solution, far nicer than Gmail. [ Posted at 5:31 PM | Permalink ]
Friday, February 02, 2007Does Google really regret censoring information in China?I guess I'm not the only one who doesn't buy Google's hypocritical "do no evil" mantra:When the Google founders talk about the decision being bad for Google, it’s purely on a business level. They could care less about ethics, about doing what’s right, about living up to their “Don’t be evil” slogan, and about principles. As long as things are good for business, they’ll go ahead with it no matter what. And this was ofcourse their motivation to help censor information at the very beginning as I wrote. But when they don’t get what they want from the Chinese government, then suddenly the “principled approach makes more sense.”[ Posted at 4:29 PM | Permalink ]
|
|
Nexus Home | Nexus Archives | Email Paul
|