Internet Nexus

Home
RSS
Archives
Everything Must Go New!


Search this site

Web This site

More of my sites

WinInfo Daily News
SuperSite for Windows
Windows IT Pro Magazine
Connected Home
Thurrott Dot Com
Windows Weekly at TWIT



Subscribe in iTunes!






 

Thursday, September 06, 2007

KDE 4.0 Beta 2 Release Announcement

Yikes. KDE 4.0 looks awesome:


KDE:
The KDE Community proudly presents the second Beta release for KDE 4.0. This release marks the beginning of the feature freeze and the stabilization of the current codebase.

Since the libraries were frozen with the first Beta, KDE developers have been adding features and functionality to their applications. Now it is time to start polishing these features; writing and translating documentation, improving the usability, and completing the artwork. As KDE 4.0 is feature-frozen now, going into bugfixing mode, major ideas and changes will be held off until 4.1. However, some KDE components, such as Plasma, are exempt from this freeze and will still see significant improvements.

The following months will see fanatical work to stabilize the KDE applications and libraries, and the finishing touch on the components not yet frozen. Two further beta's are planned, after which KDE will be frozen for a release candidate cycle ending in a release planned around Christmas at the end of the year.
Related, if not nearly as interesting: KOffice 2.0 Alpha 3 Release Announcement

Thanks Tero.

Labels:

[ Posted at 10:44 AM | Permalink ]

 


Thursday, August 30, 2007

Introducing the Hardy Heron

Jono Bacon, the Community Manager for Ubuntu, introduces the version of Ubuntu Linux that will debut in Spring 2008 (the next version will ship in October 2007):
I am delighted to have the pleasure of announcing the Hardy Heron (Ubuntu 8.04), the next version of Ubuntu that will succeed Gutsy Gibbon (Ubuntu 7.10, due for release in October 2007). Not only will the Ubuntu community continue to do what it does best, produce an easy-to-use, reliable, free software platform, but this release will proudly wear the badge of Long Term Support (LTS) and be supported with security updates for five years on the server and three years on the desktop. We look forward to releasing the Hardy Heron in April 2008.

The Ubuntu community continues to see incredible growth in its diverse range of areas such as packaging, development, documentation, quality assurance, translations, LoCo teams and more. Each new release gives us all an opportunity to shine, irrespective of which bricks in the project we are laying, and this is at the heart of our belief - working together to produce an Operating System that will empower its users and shape the IT industry, putting free software at the corner-stone of our direction.

Everyone is welcome to participate, everyone is welcome to get involved, and everyone is welcome to help shape the form of the Hardy Heron. Let’s work together to shake things up, make things happen and make the most compelling Ubuntu release yet. Start your engines…
Nicely said. The Linux community needs a few more people who can communicate like this and push Linux into the world of a choice rather than an alternative to something else.

Labels:

[ Posted at 9:35 AM | Permalink ]

 


Monday, August 20, 2007

How many desktop Linux users are there?

Desktop Linux:
Desktop operating systems numbers, even when gathered by top research companies, such as IDG and Gartner, are often a bit fuzzy. When it comes to uncommon desktop operating systems, like Linux, the numbers often amount to little more than an educated guess. Now, a new open-source program, statix, promises to give accurate data on how many Linux desktops are actually in use.
The answer, obviously, is 42.

Labels:

[ Posted at 3:34 PM | Permalink ]

 


Sunday, June 03, 2007

The Ignorance of Crowds

Nicholas G. Carr tackles an issue related to my contention that there just isn't a lot of innovation occuring in the Linux space. Here's why:
The open source model has proven to be an extraordinarily powerful way to refine programs that already exist — Linux, for instance, is an elaboration of the venerable Unix operating system, and the open source Firefox browser builds on Netscape’s old Navigator — but it has proven less successful at creating exciting new programs from scratch. That fact has led some to conclude that peer production [the so-called "bazaar" model as described in the "The Cathedral and the Bazaar." --Paul] is best viewed as a means for refining the old rather than inventing the new; that it’s an optimization model more than an invention model.

What’s the bazaar good for, and what isn’t it good for?

First, peer production works best with routine or narrowly defined tasks that can be pursued simultaneously by a big crowd of people. It is not well suited to a job that requires a lot of coordination among the participants.

Second, because it requires so many “eyeballs,” open source works best when the labor is donated or partially subsidized. If Linus Torvalds had had to compensate all his “eyeballs,” he would have gone broke long ago.

Third, and most important, the open source model — when it works effectively — is not as egalitarian or democratic as it is often made out to be. Linux has been successful not just because so many people have been involved, but because the crowd’s work has been filtered through a central authority who holds supreme power as a synthesizer and decision maker.

If Raymond made a mistake in his paper, it was in drawing too sharp a distinction between the cathedral and the bazaar. They’re not two different and incompatible approaches to innovation. Their relationship is symbiotic. Without the bazaar, the cathedral model moves too slowly. Without the cathedral, the bazaar model lacks focus and discipline.
Good stuff, and a very interesting read. The important points about the lack of innovation in open source are towards the end: Please do check it out.

Thanks Ian!

Labels:

[ Posted at 1:14 PM | Permalink ]

 


Thursday, May 24, 2007

Dell Launches Linux PCs, Inks Deal with Wal-Mart

Me in WinInfo:
Today, Dell will launch three Linux-based consumer-oriented PCs in the US market only, fulfilling its promise to offer the open source solution on a limited basis by the end of May. The PCs include both notebook and desktop models and run the Ubuntu 7.04 distribution of Linux. Additionally, Dell announced that retailing giant Wal-Mart will begin selling its Windows-based PCs, the first time the company's products would be made widely available through a mass market retailer.
Maybe I should have waited a few days on that Dell PC, just to see what the Linux preinstall looks like. Ah well.

On a related note, FedEx actually delivered that recently ordered Dell PC to my house yesterday. This is a rather astonishing turnaround time, given that I ordered the PC on Tuesday: It arrived less than two days later. (And I only paid for ground shipping, too.) Credit Dell for making PCs in the US. By comparison, press darling Apple makes a big point of how it "designs" its hardware in California, but everything they make (Macs, iPods, etc.) ships from the dark wilds of China. Where, I'm sure, the human rights abuses are kept to an absolute minimum.

Labels: ,

[ Posted at 9:42 AM | Permalink ]

 

Linux market share levels off

Yahoo Finance reports on a phenomena that I've been expecting for a while now:
Two interesting surveys released this week by IDC and Evans spell good news for Microsoft in its battle with the Linux open source software operating system for systems dominance.

IDC reports that Windows server revenue grew faster than Linux server revenue in Q107, a placement Microsoft had never achieved before in the almost 10 years IDC has been fielding the server-sales tracking survey.

That indicates to me that Linux as a server platform is leveling off much sooner than proponents anticipated. Red Hat (RAT) has been clear of late that its business is about UNIX migration rather than beating Windows.

The absolute Linux-based server sales number of $1.6 billion for the quarter is at one third of Microsoft’s Windows server sales, which at $4.8 billion represent 38% of all server revenue.
I think I just wrote about this. The problem for Linux is that Windows Server is high-quality and offers an amazing range of functionality. In the end, the Achilles Heel of Linux is that it's always playing catch-up, and that's true whether you're talking about the server or the desktop: There's no real innovation in the Linux space once you get past the supposed free-ness of it all.

Labels:

[ Posted at 9:11 AM | Permalink ]

 


Tuesday, May 22, 2007

Five crucial things the Linux community doesn’t understand about the average computer user

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes of ZD Blogs raises some interesting points:
On the whole, most people would rather spend the money on Windows (or Mac) than take the time to experiment with Linux.

Why?

I’ve come to the conclusion that there are five crucial things the Linux community doesn’t understand about the average computer user, and that these five things are slowing down the adoption of Linux onto desktop systems in the home and office.

1 - On the whole, users aren’t all that dissatisfied with Windows
This is absolutely true in my experience, and the one thing that most Linux (and Mac) users don't understand. I'm glad this was his first point: There is this collection of nauseating wanna-be pundits online who insist that Windows is a piece of crap, but that hasn't been the case for years. Maybe longer. I recall being an Amiga guy in the early 1990's and despising Microsoft. But once I saw the Windows 95/4.0 beta I realized things were changing and that using Windows, finally, could be a choice and not a requirement. I will say this loud and clear to all Windows bashers: Using Windows isn't horrible. In fact, many of us make a conscious decision to use the best OS on earth, with its unassailable software library and compatibility with services, software, and hardware. And yes, it's a choice.
2 - Too many distros
Absolutely. In fact, there's a version of Linux for every Linux user, if I'm not mistaken. This is the dark side of open source: Too much choice. It sounds silly, but choosing a Linux distro is like choosing a bottle of salad dressing: There are 127 varieties in the average US supermarket, but most people just go with the one they know.
3 - People want certainty that hardware and software will work
See my points above about compatibility. This issue dogs Apple as well, though obviously there are solutions there for technical users.
4 - As far as most people are concerned, the command line has gone the way of the dinosaur
Obviously, he means "consumers" or "individuals" which are most people, and by extension, "most people who use computers." What's interesting is that the command line is actually making a comeback at Microsoft, though those efforts will be seen solely by system administrators: Windows Server 2008 includes two command line environments (one of which is the object-oriented, .NET-based Power Shell), major new command line tools (like servermanagercmd.exe), and, going forward, all Microsoft management tools will be built for Power Shell first: GUI-based tools will be built off of the command line stuff. That's UNIX, folks (and, by extension, Linux). Interesting.
5 - Linux is still too geeky
Yep. Ultimately, however, I'd argue that Linux is "too limited," at least on the desktop, and that's why it's flailing with consumers.

I'll take this a step further. While Linux will always have a role in the server market, even that role will be diminished over time as Windows Server gets better and better. In fact, I'm curious how the Linux community will do anything but lose share to Windows Server going forward, duplicating the situation we see on the desktop. It seems inevitable to me, given how much Windows Server is improving.

Labels: , ,

[ Posted at 9:21 AM | Permalink ]

 


Monday, May 21, 2007

Is Intel trying to torpedo the OLPC?

Larry Dignan in ZDNet Blogs:
Nicholas Negroponte, head of the One Laptop Per Child project, blasted Intel for trying to usurp any momentum his effort is getting.

Negroponte’s argument delivered via 60 Minutes: Intel was pitching its wares and a cheap PC dubbed the Classmate to torpedo the OLPC effort, which needs 3 million orders to start manufacturing.

I happened to catch 60 Minutes as I was flipping through channels and admit I was torn by the whole story, which even included a 60 Minutes gotcha moment–documents Intel was sending to OLPC potential customers touting its chips. The OLPC uses AMD chips.

“Intel should be ashamed of itself,” Negroponte says. “It’s just – it’s just shameless.”
I watched 60 Minutes last night and I have to say, I found Negroponte far more credible than Intel's CEO. Clearly, Intel, which had belittled the OLPC project repeatedly, later jumped into this market solely to prevent Negroponte from selling AMD-based hardware to third world countries. Meanwhile, all Intel has really accomplished is preventing Negroponte, who is clearly and blatantly acting solely out of charity--OLPC is non-profit--from fulfilling his dream of spreading computing around the world. Intel should be ashamed of itself. This is an outrage.

Labels:

[ Posted at 1:59 PM | Permalink ]

 


Tuesday, May 08, 2007

The State of Ubuntu 7.04 Is Strong

Jason Brooks takes on the latest Ubuntu release for eWeek:
Ubuntu Linux 7.04, which Dell has chosen to headline its desktop Linux foray, has made impressive strides toward claiming a spot on mainstream desktop and server machines, both by piling up advances made across the Linux and open source community, and by building in advances of its own.

For instance, we're glad to see that in Ubuntu 7.04—also known as Feisty Fawn—the NetworkManager application, which we like for the way it handles switching among wired and wireless networks and managing VPN connections, has gone from being an optional add-on to a part of the default install.

Ubuntu's best features remain its excellent software management tools, its well-organized community and its large catalog of ready-to-install free software applications. We're also impressed with the steps that Ubuntu has taken to work with proprietary software, which, while more tricky to distribute, is in many cases what's needed to fit the bill.

As a desktop option, Ubuntu 7.04 is an excellent fit, and is worthy of consideration as a Windows replacement.

Labels:

[ Posted at 9:39 AM | Permalink ]

 


Tuesday, May 01, 2007

Dell To Offer Ubuntu Linux

So I guess it's official now:
Canonical and Dell are pleased to announce a partnership to offer Ubuntu 7.04 on select desktop and notebook products. This is a tremendous step forward for Ubuntu, our users and customers.

We believe that Dell’s decision is a strong endorsement of Ubuntu and to the work of many in coding, translating and promoting open source software. It is also testament to the demand that exists for Ubuntu.

Canonical is honoured to play a leading role in making Linux more widely available to everyone.
Two comments here:

1. Desktop Linux isn't going to set the world on fire at Dell or any other PC maker.

2. If Dell feels it must offer any version of Linux, Ubuntu is the way to go. I'm glad they at least picked the right distribution. (I know Dell will offer other Linux versions as well.)

Related: Dell to Offer Ubuntu 7.04 (Dell)

Labels:

[ Posted at 4:46 PM | Permalink ]

 


Thursday, April 19, 2007

Ubuntu 7.04

It's out, though predictably the download servers are going to be slow today thanks to the hordes of users trying to get it. The release notes are also available.

Labels:

[ Posted at 12:03 PM | Permalink ]

 


Monday, April 16, 2007

Announcing Ubuntu version 7.04

Ubuntu:
For users wanting a secure, feature rich alternative to Microsoft Windows, Canonical Ltd., the commercial sponsor of Ubuntu, announced today the Thursday release of Ubuntu version 7.04.

Ubuntu is the award-winning Linux distribution for the desktop, laptop, thin client and server which brings together the best of open source software every 6 months. Ubuntu 7.04 desktop edition includes a ground-breaking Windows migration assistant, excellent wireless networking support and improved multimedia support.

"In the coming months, many individuals and businesses will be making the decision to upgrade their existing computer systems and their operating systems," said Jane Silber, director of Operations, Canonical Ltd. "With added features to both the desktop and server editions, Ubuntu 7.04 is the most user-friendly version to date and is ideally suited to anyone who wants to make the switch to Linux and join the community of Ubuntu users. In fact, with this version of Ubuntu, it is easier than ever to move away from proprietary platforms."

At the same time as Ubuntu, the project also will release new versions of Kubuntu and Edubuntu, specialized versions of Ubuntu which include the KDE desktop environment and educational applications, respectively.

Labels:

[ Posted at 12:27 PM | Permalink ]

 


Sunday, April 08, 2007

Schools should use Openoffice.org

Nate Grondin:
School districts should switch to OpenOffice.org instead of paying all that money for MS Office. I use OpenOffice.org Writer as my main word processor, and it does everything I need it to do. School districts must pay somewhere between $50 and $100 for MS Office for each and every computer in the school. Every time the school replaces those computers (usually every 2-4 years), there will probably be a “new” version of MS Office that has tons of “new” features that no one will use, but the school district will still pay for. This adds up to a lot of money.

Tradition and continuity are really the only reasons that schools are still buying MS Office, but not for long.
Eh. I'm not sure that's entirely true: Microsoft Office is demonstrably better than OpenOffice, in reality, but it's also the corporate standard, so it makes sense that schools would want to use the products it students will face in the real world. Should OpenOffice gain some traction in education--and frankly, it's (lack of) cost does make that a possibility--I'd expect Microsoft to respond with even-cheaper deals. But really, in the context of an education, the $125 one spends on the retail version of Office 2007 Home and Student (which must cost actual students far less) is a minor expense. If cost were the only issue, all schools would be moving toward Linux and OpenOffice.

Thanks Matt.

Labels:

[ Posted at 10:02 AM | Permalink ]

 


Tuesday, April 03, 2007

“Want to” Vs. “Have to”

Ubuntu Blog:
More people use Windows not because they want to, but because they have to. More people use Linux [and OS X, I'd add --Paul] not because they have to, but because they want to.
I disagree.

But I think I see the point he's trying to make.

Actually, from what I can tell, many, many people use Windows because they want to. I'm talking about people here, not office drones. These guys want to access the world's largest software library. They want to take advantage of all the hardware that's out there. They want to play games. They want to do whatever it is. But it isn't always "need." It's often "want."

That said, many (most?) people who use OS X and, to a greater extent, Linux, are making a statement. My guess is that these people are generally very technical and know exactly what they want. They're smart enough to work outside the mainstream and know it's going to work. They know where to go to get help. And so on.

So I know he was trying to be profound. But this isn't "have to" vs. want. The truth is, for most people--like, 99.99 percent of the computing using public--a computer is a tool. What they "want" isn't a particular OS. What they want is a solution to a problem, or an answer to a need. They want email. They want the Web. They want Office. Games. Digital photos and music.

Anyone who stays up at night worrying about OS platforms just isn't part of the mainstream. That's not good or bad, it's just reality. And yeah, that might be me and it might be you (whoever you are, reading this). But it's not the world. It's not most people. Learning to understand that your needs and wants are not the same as other people's and are, in this case especially, a very minority opinion is an important step in getting The Big Picture. We'll all get there eventually.

Labels: ,

[ Posted at 3:59 PM | Permalink ]

 


Thursday, March 29, 2007

OpenOffice.org 2.2

OpenOffice.org:
The OpenOffice.org Community announce the release of OpenOffice.org 2.2, the latest version of the leading open-source office suite. With upgrades to its word processor, spreadsheet, presentations, and database software, the free software package provides a real alternative to Microsoft's recently-released Office 2007 product - and an easier upgrade path for existing Microsoft Office users. OpenOffice.org 2.2 also protects users from newly discovered vulnerabilities, where users' PCs could be open to attack if they opened documents from, or accessed web sites set up by, malicious individuals.

In version 2.2, users will immediately notice the improvement in the quality of text display in all parts of OpenOffice.org. The reason for this is that the previously optional support for kerning, a technique to improve the appearance of text written in proportional fonts, has now been enabled by default. OpenOffice.org's unique pdf export function has also been enhanced with the addition of the optional creation of bookmarks feature, and support for user-definable export of form fields.

While OpenOffice.org 2.1 functions well on Microsoft's Windows Vista, version 2.2 makes use of some of the new cosmetic changes available in Vista, the new file dialogues being an example. Apple Mac users will notice a smaller download and a smaller installed size. The Apple Mac Intel version has many stability improvements, and bug fixes ranging from .ppt export to improved UNO connections. Version 2.2 now requires Mac OS X 10.4.x running X11.
While I've always been fascinated by software alternatives, OpenOffice.org has consistently failed to excite me. I'm not sure what it is, to be honest. But now that Office 2007 has completely raised the bar in new and previously unexpected ways, OpenOffice.org is less exciting than ever.

Labels:

[ Posted at 11:15 AM | Permalink ]

 

It's Official: Dell Offering Linux on Select Notebooks, PCs

Me, in WinInfo:
Dell has responded to overwhelming feedback from its IdeaStorm customer feedback site this week by announcing that it will soon begin offering the open source operating system Linux on select Dell desktop and notebook PCs. The announcement comes about a month and a half after IdeaStorm was first brought online. The availability of Linux was, overwhelmingly, the number one customer request.

"We have heard you and appreciate the direct feedback," Dell wrote to customers in a posting to its corporate blog. "We will expand our Linux support beyond our existing servers and Precision workstation line. Our first step in this effort is offering Linux pre-installed on select desktop and notebook systems. We will provide an update in the coming weeks that includes detailed information on which systems we will offer, our testing and certification efforts, and the Linux distribution(s) that will be available. The countdown begins today."

Labels:

[ Posted at 10:35 AM | Permalink ]

 


Tuesday, March 27, 2007

Ubuntu 7.04 (Feisty Fawn) Beta Preview

A good overview of the newly-released Ubuntu 7.04 beta from Only Ubuntu Linux:
The Ubuntu developers are moving very quickly to bring you the absolute latest and greatest software the Open Source Community has to offer. This is the Ubuntu 7.04 Beta and it comes packed with a whole host of excellent new features including the released GNOME 2.18, the 2.6.20 kernel and much more.

Ubuntu 7.04 is the most user-friendly Ubuntu to date and includes a ground-breaking Windows migration assistant, excellent wireless networking support and improved multimedia support.
I installed this in VMWare yesterday and it's the cleanest version of Linux I've seen yet. I will note, however, that Ubuntu really needs to drop the brown color scheme as the default: It's not attractive, and while I hate to just focus on such a fluffy issue, it's the first thing I change when I boot into Ubuntu.

Labels:

[ Posted at 10:19 AM | Permalink ]

 


Monday, March 26, 2007

Ubuntu 7.04 Beta

Ubuntu:
The Ubuntu team is proud to announce the beta release of Ubuntu 7.04.

Ubuntu 7.04 is the most user-friendly Ubuntu to date and includes a ground-breaking Windows migration assistant, excellent wireless networking support and improved multimedia support.

Desktop highlights:

Windows migration tool: The new migration tool recognises Internet Explorer bookmarks, Firefox favourites, desktop wallpaper, AOL IM contacts, and Yahoo IM contacts, and imports them into Ubuntu during installation. This offers easier and faster migration for new users of Ubuntu and individuals wanting to run a dual-boot system.

Easy-to-install codec wizards: A new guided wizard for installing codecs not shipped with Ubuntu gives users a safe way of installing codecs they can legally use to view multimedia content.

Plug and play network sharing with Avahi: This new feature allows users to automatically discover and join a wireless network and share music, find printers and more.

Labels:

[ Posted at 5:06 PM | Permalink ]

 


Sunday, March 25, 2007

Paul Thurrott's Apple TV review...

John Molloy of ZDNet refuses to do ten minutes of research:
Paul Thurrott does his expected hatchet job on Apple TV. We can't have the SuperSite for Windows being too Apple friendly.
No, that wouldn't do, now, would it?

So what do my last five Apple reviews on the SuperSite for Windows really look like? Let's check:

Apple iPod shuffle 2G Review (2006-11-04 - FIVE STARS out of FIVE
Conclusion: "Well, they've done it again. Apple's new iPod shuffle is a wonder of size, weight, and usability, and the perfect companion for music lovers who don't want their portable audio player to get in the way."

Apple iPod with video (5G, Late 2006) Review (2006-09-27) - FIVE STARS out of FIVE
Conclusion: "The latest iPod continues Apple's tradition of excellence and remains, as before, the standard by which all other portable media players are measured. This is the best iPod yet. And you know you want one."

Apple iPod nano 2G Review (2006-09-22) - FIVE STARS out of FIVE
Conclusion: "The second generation iPod nano is the best small-sized portable media player on the market today, and it builds on the excellence of its predecessor by fixing the scratching problem that marred previous versions while improving the battery life, providing a rainbow selection of colors from which to choose, and offering a lower price. Is the iPod nano perfect? Nothing ever is, but the nano comes as close as is imaginable given its small form factor."

Apple iTunes 7 Review (2006-09-21) - FOUR STARS out of FIVE
Conclusion: "Apple's iTunes 7 is the best version of iTunes yet and is, without question, the finest media player on any platform, even when you factor in the problems that are currently dogging the Windows version."

Apple Boot Camp Review (2006-04-07) - FOUR STARS out of FIVE
Conclusion: "While Boot Camp isn't perfect, it's still a semi-miraculous solution that lets you dual boot between Mac OS X and Windows XP on an Intel-based Mac. That, folks, is what's known as the best of both worlds in these parts, and I'm personally very excited at the prospect of, or at the opportunity to, purchase Apple notebooks and desktops in the future."

Yeah, I'm dead set against Apple, ain't I? One might logically wonder who's really biased here: Me, or John.

One might also wonder if my Apple TV review is simply an accurate portrayal of my opinion of the device which, again, I feel is pretty limited. Sorry if that offends you, but I think my past five Apple reviews show that I have no problem heaping the praise on Apple when it's deserved.

Labels: , , ,

[ Posted at 11:43 AM | Permalink ]

 


Tuesday, March 20, 2007

Red Hat Plans Linux Desktop Offering 'for the Masses'

eWeek:
Red Hat is planning a packaged Linux desktop solution that it hopes will push its Linux desktop offering to a far broader audience than exists for its current client solution.

"As we move out with this new desktop strategy, which we will announce sometime over the next few months, we will really look at the desktop from the perspective of a very different market," Paul Cormier, Red Hat's executive vice president of engineering, told eWEEK in an interview.

"This will be a more comprehensive offering that will target markets like the small and medium-sized business [SMB] sector and emerging markets. Part of this strategy is to get the desktop more to the masses than our existing client is getting today. So there will be a different packaged solution for the masses coming down the pike," he said.

Asked if part of the strategy is the mass consumer market, Cornier responded that Red Had has "no plans to go and sell this offering at Best Buy, if that's what you mean by the mass consumer market. Customers will be able to download it and get a Red Hat Network subscription on the Web for it, which is what we feel is the distribution wave of the future anyway," he said.
Hey, it's not like Red Hat abandoned this market already, so this is great news. Oh, wait.

Labels:

[ Posted at 11:05 AM | Permalink ]

 


Monday, March 19, 2007

Sun hires Debian Linux founder

News.com:
Sun Microsystems has hired Ian Murdock, who founded the Debian version of Linux and who has held various posts involving the open-source operating system.

At Sun, Murdock now holds the title of chief operating platforms officer. On his blog, he said he'll work both with Linux and Sun's newly open-source competitor, Solaris.

Sun has had a mixed approach toward Linux. Initially disparaging, Chairman and then-Chief Executive Scott McNealy donned a penguin mascot outfit in an about-face to show support. But the company afterward resurrected a nearly exterminated version of Solaris for x86 servers, where Linux is most popular, and McNealy predicted in 2005 that Solaris and Windows would be the "two clear survivors" in the operating system market.
I can understand why Sun wanted Murdock, but I can't understand why Murdock would shack up with a company that's been so two-faced about Linux. This could be interesting.

Related: Joining Sun

Labels:

[ Posted at 5:09 PM | Permalink ]

 


Tuesday, March 13, 2007

Dell to Expand Linux Options

So if I'm reading Dell's Direct2Dell blog correctly, they're literally going to start offering Linux on at least some PCs soon:
Your feedback on Dell IdeaStorm has been astounding. Thank you! We hear your requests for desktops and notebooks with Linux. We’re crafting product offerings in response, but we’d like a little more direct feedback from you: your preferences, your desires. We recognize some people prefer notebooks over desktops, high-end models over value models, your favorite Linux distribution, telephone-based support over community-based support, and so on. We can’t offer everything (all systems, all distributions, all support options), so we’ve crafted a survey to let you help us prioritize what we should deliver for you.

Taking a few minutes to complete this survey will help us define our forthcoming Linux-based system offerings. We will close the survey on Friday, March 23. From there, we’ll take some time to analyze your feedback and work to provide the platforms and options you choose.
My goodness.

Labels:

[ Posted at 7:56 PM | Permalink ]

 

Wall Street Journal tackles 'Year of Desktop Linux'

Now, even the Wall Street Journal (print version) is hopping on the "Year of Desktop Linux" bandwagon:
The Linux operating system, having made inroads into corporations' backroom server computers, is showing hints of inching into a much broader market: employees' personal computers.

The much-hyped notion that Linux would be viable software to run desktop and notebook PCs seemed dead on arrival a few years ago. But the idea is showing some new vital signs.

Some CIOs are taking new interest in installing Linux on workers' PCs as well, for certain narrow applications.

The allure of desktop Linux is the low entry cost: A typical license for Linux from Novell is $50 a year per PC versus the $299 Microsoft charges for Windows to businesses that don't have a long-term contract with the software maker. (Contract customers, mostly large businesses, pay less than $299 for Windows; Microsoft charges $199 for an upgrade.)

Linux still goes into only a tiny proportion of the desktop and laptop PCs sold. [No percentage is given, though a lot of space is wasted on "growth" discussions. Clearly, this is under 1 percent. --Paul]

Whether Linux gains a stronger footing in PCs depends partly on whether PC makers start supporting it more strongly. To date, neither Dell Inc. nor Hewlett-Packard Co. have offered PCs preloaded with Linux. But Dell has been soliciting input from its customers to help guide its plans for Linux -- which some industry observers say could lead the company to start making Linux PCs. Today Dell will start a formal survey on its Web site to determine what Linux products and support customers want, says Bob Pearson, a Dell spokesman.
So there you have it. In the end, this article is just another reaction to Dell's customer feedback Web site. Curious. There is a cute (and realistic) quote at the end, however:
The State of Illinois in recently consolidated its IT systems onto Microsoft software -- and has no interest in using Linux, says Paul Campbell, director of the state's Central Management Services department. "We don't have time for science projects in state government," he says.

Labels:

[ Posted at 9:25 AM | Permalink ]

 


Saturday, March 10, 2007

The Next Hurdle for Desktop Linux

Brian Proffitt at Linux Today takes on an interesting problem facing desktop Linux, as if desktop Linux didn't already have enough problems:
We just passed a quiet milestone at the beginning of the month. And while the milestone does not seem to effect Linux, it could be mark the beginning of the worst assault on desktop Linux to date.

As of March 1, it seems, all televisions sold in the US are to be HDTV ready.

I know, seems a bit far afield from the joys of Linux, doesn't it? But it could impact Linux, because of what the coming of HDTV represents: the potential marginalization of Linux to older machines or servers.

Labels:

[ Posted at 8:25 PM | Permalink ]

 

The Five Things You Aren't Allowed to Discuss About Linux

Rob Enderle hits one out of the park. My favorite part in number five:
Is Linux is “Open”?

How can anything be “Open” if honest discussion isn’t allowed?

If you think a Microsoft product sucks you can say that to great detail without having to be afraid of your job, apparently even if you work for Microsoft (which I kind of find surprising). But if you suggest that Linux isn’t ready for the desktop — which I do often because it isn’t – you’ll have folks coming after your job and, sometimes, suggesting you won’t be long for this world. Some of the mail has been rather nasty (though I do admit it has moderated of late).

No product is perfect for everything. What made Windows good for the desktop is largely what makes Linux a better product for some servers.

I think the thing that bothers me the most about Linux is IT advocacy. IT shouldn’t be an advocate of any product, because it needs to make determinations between them. Whether it is Microsoft, Apple, or Linux, once IT takes a side it is no longer capable of properly assessing a solution based on the needs of the business. And that is the job.

IT needs to ensure, not prevent, discussion so that the best product, company, or service is chosen, and when they can’t do that, they should find other jobs.

When only one side is heard, you don’t have “Open,” and you sure as heck don’t have “Free” as in Freedom, which, to me is more important than “Free” as in “Free Beer.” If, to get “Free” Software, we give up “Free” Speech the cost, at least to me, is way the heck too high.
Amazing stuff. Bravo.

Labels:

[ Posted at 8:22 PM | Permalink ]

 


Sunday, March 04, 2007

Woo! Another "Year of Desktop Linux" Story

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols asks, Is a Linux Desktop Avalanche Coming? Allow me to answer this question, as I do every year.

No.

But I'm amused people are still arguing this could happen. It's pretty obvious at this point that widespread dissatisfaction with Windows is a myth. That said, a certain segment of the population--let's call them the better educated, technically-savvy, hip crowd--will undergo whatever effort is required to "think different" and use a Mac. Currently, that's about 2.5 percent of computer users worldwide, or about 4 percent in the US. There's another segment, much smaller, who prefer Linux. These guys are the computing equivalent of organic food or hybrid car fans. However, unlike those markets, Linux desktop usage is simply not growing. It's just not happening. I'm curious that that's the case. But it just is.

Obviously.

Articles like this pander to the open source community, and it's unclear what the point is. It's full of hopeful yet unscientific language like "momentum," "getting better and better," and "about to change." But come on, every "year of desktop Linux" story from the past ten years has used the same language. There's nothing going on now to suggest that anyone is actually making this switch. There's just the hope, the wish, the continuing examples of how Linux is just "getting better and better." Of course it is. So is Windows and Mac OS X. And maybe that's the problem, if you're selling something that relies more on faith than reality.

Thanks Bob.

Labels:

[ Posted at 1:18 PM | Permalink ]

 



 

The '07 iPods!








My latest book


 

Nexus Home | Nexus Archives | Email Paul
Copyright © 2001-2007 Paul Thurrott. All Rights Reserved.