![]() |
More of my sitesWinInfo Daily News
|
About this siteFor six years, the Internet Nexus served as my technology blog, but I've since started blogging at the SuperSite Blog instead. If you're looking for the blog, please head there. --Paul Coming soon: Everything Must GoThe next edition of "Everything Must Go" will be appearing here soon. --Paul Thursday, September 20, 2007NBC to Offer Downloads of Its ShowsThe New York Times:NBC Universal said yesterday that it would soon permit consumers to download many of NBC’s most popular programs free to personal computers and other devices for one week immediately after their broadcasts.This whole thing is stupid, which is pretty much all I have to say on this. Moving on, I just have to comment on a semi-related topic. We subscribe to the print version of The New York Times, and it's one of two newspapers I read each day. (The other is the increasingly uninteresting Boston Globe.) For some reason I can't honestly fathom, the NBC story noted here was on the front page of the newspaper today, and not just on the front page, but on the top of the front page. Meanwhile, a story about Dan Rather suing CBS News for violating his contract and prematurely ending his career there is relegated to Business section of the paper, despite allegations of evidence that might exonerate him in part regarding his role in a report about US president Bush's National Guard service. This was a major national news story. NBC posting Web downloads of its TV shows, obviously, is not. What the frick is up with The New York Times? Labels: Digital media, iTunes [ Posted at 9:01 AM | Permalink ]
Wil Shipley wakes up to Apple lock-inDelicious Monster author Wil Shipley wakes up to what I've been complaining about for quite some time now:The iPhone is a closed system, like the iPods before it, so third parties can only develop software for it if they are EXTREMELY close to Apple. This is an incredibly frightening trend. As Apple gets more and more of its revenue from non-Mac devices, they are also getting more and more of their revenue from devices that simply exclude third parties.Wil, welcome to the party. I'm saddened it took you years and several Apple product release waves and strategy moves to agree that the company is engaged in lock-in at the expense of consumers, but whatever. Here you are. I'd like to reference again my recent comments about Apple and what should be a very damaging antitrust inquiry if there's any justice in the world. This isn't about "anti-Apple." It's about "pro-consumer." Some don't get this, but people matter more than corporations. BTW, even John Gruber is seeing this issue pretty clearly now, at least with regards to ringtones: Faced with the choice between doing what’s right for customers or charging them money for something they shouldn’t need to pay for, Apple chose the latter. There is no middle ground. And any business that hinges on your customers “not knowing any better” is a bad business.Thanks Jerry. Labels: Apple, Digital media, iPod, iTunes [ Posted at 8:33 AM | Permalink ]
Wednesday, September 19, 2007Apple defends iTunes in Berlin, BrusselsReuters:Apple President Steve Jobs reiterated his commitment to charging the same price for iTunes downloads across Europe as his lawyers defended the company on Wednesday against allegations its prices are not uniform.Now that the EU's case against Microsoft was found to be basically flawless, you can expect regulators there to turn their attention to other computer industry near-monopolies, most notably Apple (with the iPod and iTunes) and Google (with online search, or, more appropriately, online advertising). Apple fans are curiously militaristic in their defense of the company along these lines, but bundling is bundling, and if the EU made Microsoft decouple Windows Media Player from Windows, you can pretty much expect the same treatment of the iPod and iTunes. This issue cited above is, of course, about pricing of music online. But this is how cans of worms get opened. Stay tuned. Related: Time for Apple to face the music? [ Posted at 5:43 PM | Permalink ]
Sunday, September 16, 2007Is Apple TV an iFlop?Forbes takes a look at a product Apple seems to have all but ignored since it was first released last year:
So here's the thing. In the days leading up to the Apple TV's release, I bemoaned the fact that it lacked DVR capabilities and thus could never be real competition for Microsoft's excellent Media Center software (available since 2002) and Media Center Extender hardware (available since 2004). That's still true today, and as I noted in my review of the Apple TV, the device is really just "an iPod designed for your living room instead of your pocket. It is simply yet another way to consume content purchased from Apple's nearly-ubiquitous iTunes Store." I award the thing 3 out of 5 stars and declared that it is "big on hype but short on functionality."
But is it a flop?
Maybe. I do like the idea of the Apple TV, though again, it's hugely diminished without DVR functionality. If you've completely bought into the Apple digital media ecosystem, it works pretty well. But even then there are limitations: You still can't buy any HD content on iTunes, relegating the box's 720p display capabilities moot. And if you rip your own DVDs to MPEG-4 or H.264 you have some choices to make, as the Apple TV can play back 640 x whatever movies aimed at the iPod, but the reverse isn't true of the slightly higher-resolution movies the Apple TV supports, but the iPod does not. The whole thing is kind of a mess. Technologically, the Apple TV is a mixed bag.
If these sales figures are to be believed, the Apple TV is a sales flop as well. If this were Microsoft, we'd all knowingly nod our heads at the notion that the company would simply issue a few upgrades and eventually get it right. But this is Apple, which tends to bolt from defeats, especially the high profile ones, as quickly as possible.And that's a shame, because the Apple TV could have turned into a cool product. For me, the most damning evidence that this will never happen is Jobs himself and his comments about it being "a hobby". It's just too bad. Labels: Apple, Digital media, iPod, iTunes [ Posted at 1:28 PM | Permalink ]
Tuesday, September 11, 2007Argh.... Ringtones still don't work (properly)So after posting all those shots I actually completed syncing the iPhone ... and get this message:![]() WTF. It plays fine in iTunes. Update: You have to play the ringtone version in iTunes before it will sync. (Not the song.) Sorry, but this isn't obvious at all. This system is just broken as-is. There is no way normal people can use this easily. [ Posted at 10:22 AM | Permalink ]
Making a ringtone with iTunes 7.4.xFull-sized images at source:
iTunes ringtones go live ... sort ofSo I discovered this morning that the new Ringtones feature is live in iTunes 7.4.x, sort of: My only attempt thus far at making a ringtone has ended in the following error:Could not create ringtone. An unknown error occurred (-42160). There was an error in the iTunes Store. Please try again later. OK No big deal. But the ringtone creation process has revealed a glaring issue with this process. Not only do you have to find a ringtone-able song in the iTunes Store, but you don't actually get full ringtone making capabilities for your $1.98. What you get is the right to edit the song once, online, and make a short clip. You can't go back and make a different ringtone from the same song if you don't like the first one, without paying for it yet again. So that additional 99 cent fee just covers a single online editing experience, and one 15-second ringtone. Obviously, I'm not a big ringtone buyer. But this seems kind of silly to me. I'll have pictures in a bit. Update: I bought a new song and got it to work. Again, pictures soon. [ Posted at 9:48 AM | Permalink ]
Monday, September 10, 2007Jumping the iSharkThe New York Times touches on the topic du jour:Let me get this straight: Steve Jobs insists that songs on iTunes cost 99 cents and television episodes cost $1.99 because consumers crave simple pricing.This is interesting on a number of levels. First, the hypocrisy thing is pretty obvious. Second, that NBC has made its shows available on Amazon Unbox for less than they sold on iTunes is telling. Finally, the "sucker" comment closely resembles the "stooge" line I used the other day. I guess we're on the same page when it comes to the gotta-have-it gadget crowd and the Monday morning quarterbacking scenario where people have actually argued that they've gotten $200 of value out of the past two months of iPhone use. Egads. Labels: Apple, Digital media, iPhone, iPod, iTunes [ Posted at 1:33 PM | Permalink ]
Saturday, September 08, 2007iTunes 7.4 obsolete after 48 hoursTUAW:There are apps that age gracefully, staying functional and relevant for months or years with no changes at all... and then there's iTunes. We had only hours to get used to a new version with support for all the iPods coming down the pike, and then in don't-blink-or-you'll-miss-it fashion, 7.4 was gone and 7.4.1 was here. Wheel in the sky, keep on turning.OK, I get it, you think I'm an Apple basher. Whatever. It does crack me up that Apple fans are the first to rag on everything Microsoft does wrong, but Apple gets a total pass with their shoddy software, which is often updated, again and again, after new versions are released. (Witness the rapid succession of iLife '08 updates this past month.) But iTunes is unreal. I use it regularly, and have come to rely on it, but... My God. And it's not just the bugginess. The performance is miserable, across the board. Double-click a video file and wait... and wait... and wait.. while it loads. The worst, of course, is photo sync with an iPod. Not only does iTunes create completely different "optimized" photos for each iPod you sync with, the process is agonizingly slow. I started syncing the iPod classic last night at dinner time, and when I got up this morning, it was about 1/3 done. Seriously. Yeah, there are a lot of photos. (8000 or so.) So what? It shouldn't take that long. Now I'm going to do it in batches over a few nights so the iPod's screen doesn't burn-in or burn out (it stays on and displays a static screen during this entire process) and so my computer is usable: The thing just kills performance while it's syncing. I don't think it's bashing to point out very real problems. I like iTunes quite a bit. But as with Firefox, I'm concerned that a tool I use regularly is getting slower and slower and slower as it gains more and more new features. This is a serious problem. And why the heck do I have to restart my computer after upgrading from iTunes 7.4 to 7.4.1? Good grief. Labels: iTunes [ Posted at 1:10 PM | Permalink ]
Sunday, September 02, 2007Sync iTunes, Windows Media Player, and ZuneI manage my master music collection through iTunes in Windows Vista, but maintain links to this collection in both Windows Media Player 11 and Zune so that I can sync that music with non-Apple devices. This works pretty well, though you have to manually update album art and perform other housekeeping tasks, especially in WMP, fairly often. Turns out there's a better way.If you're a Windows-based iTunes user, or someone looking to sync music meta data between iTunes and Windows Media Player/Media Center, you need to download a cool utility called MusicBridge immediately. MusicBridge offers manual one-way sync (in either direction) between iTunes and WMP of... - General meta data - Album art - Ratings (!!!) - Playlists And you can export and import ratings (from iTunes) to and from XML. This is an amazing tool, and highly recommended. It's amazing seeing my very thorough iTunes ratings appear, perfectly, in WMP. The only problem is that the process is manual: You have to sync these things individually, and it's not automated. No problem: MusicBridge works grea, and MusicBridge could easily be used to migrate a music collection from iTunes to WMP, or from WMP to iTunes. On the Zune side, the Zune desktop software actually includes everything you need to sync with iTunes and/or WMP, but you have to enable it: Just Access go to Monitor Folders (Options -> Library -> More Options -> Monitor Folders) and check the option titled "Add files, playlists, and ratings from another media player to library" in the Add Folders to Library dialog. Then click OK and it will all be blasted right into Zune, and kept up-to-date automatically. The end result is that iTunes, Zune, and WMP now contain nearly identical copies of my music library right now. It's a lot closer to what I've been looking for than I had imagined was possible without a lot of work and duplication. I've been playing with this stuff all weekend, along with some related tools for accessing AAC files from WMP (and thus Media Center, but not Media Center Extender) and removing DRM from iTunes-purchased songs, so they can be used with other players and devices. I may write this stuff up soon, it's really kind of fantastic. Labels: Digital media, iTunes, Zune [ Posted at 1:36 PM | Permalink ]
Saturday, September 01, 2007Apple, why can't I buy this album?I've been trying to download John Lennon's greatest hits album, Legend, via iTunes Plus for weeks now. I always get this error (on both Mac and Windows):![]() Why can't I buy this album, Apple? Labels: Digital media, iTunes [ Posted at 9:05 AM | Permalink ]
But seriously folks...So I had a little fun yesterday with this whole NBC/Apple thing. The truth is, this is pretty serious, if you'll accept the notion that anything entertainment related can truly be serious. It's serious because this will impact the way that content is digitally delivered to us in the future, and as technophiles, we should be at the forefront of this discussion. Here's what I really think about this topic...First, we have to take all of the public statements that Apple and NBC have said at face value. Yes, both companies are clearly jockeying for position here. But let's assume everything they say, on both sides, is true. NBC is wrong. When it comes to music downloads, I provisionally back the notion of tiered pricing, largely because I'm an old guy and much of what I want to buy is of the back catalog nature, and would thus be lowered priced as a result. (I wouldn't care if the new Brittney Spears single is $1.99 instead of $.99, or whatever. As far as I'm concerned, that's not music anyway and I'm not interested.) My particular wants and needs aside, however, tiered pricing can be used to screw the consumer, obviously, and in the case of TV shows, the prices can get quite high. And if Apple is correct is saying that NBC wanted to price new TV show episodes--single TV show episodes--at $4.99 a whack. I mean, my God. That's utterly ridiculous. I look at the $1.99 price now as a bit exorbitant, frankly, since you can get these shows in better quality, and for free, on TV. I mean, I have a Media Center PC. I can skip the commercials already. iTunes is not exactly a bargain, sorry, and I won't typically watch most TV shows, no matter how good, more than once. (Meanwhile, I listen to a lot of music repeatedly, and those files are just 99 cents each.) As for tiered pricing, I think older TV shows should cost less than $1.99, and you should get a more substantial discount than is currently available when you purchase an entire season or subscribe to a current season. It's unclear to me why NBC needs to make a lot of money on something like "The A Team" right now. But you know what? I might grab season one out of nostalgia alone if the cost was more reasonable. Perhaps the answer to the tiered pricing question is that new content should always be priced at the current rate, but that older content could be priced lower to move it in higher quantities. (Perhaps content could become lower priced over time, based on when it was added to the store. You wait, you save.) There needs to be a compromise on tiered pricing, in other words, but not one that screws the consumer. Both companies are being a bit self-serving here. Coming out in public as they both did in such dramatic fashion suggests that they're both willing to go to the brink. Not surprisingly, talks between NBC and Apple are ongoing. So they're using this as a PR and negotiating tool. Apple, as always, seeks to look like the champion of the little guy. I have to say, while I shudder at such a notion in general, in this case it seems believable. Here, it does appear that Apple represents the consumer's best interests. Thus, I am rooting for them to win. Put simply, I like that TV shows are available via the iTunes Store, and I've certainly purchased a number of shows that I missed for whatever reason on TV. (It's mostly a backup plan, however. I would never personally subscribe to a new TV show season via iTunes,) This is just another way for networks, in this case, to make money from customers, and it's unclear why they don't see it that way. In this case, NBC is wrong and Apple is right. How any company could be as bald facedly anti-consumer as NBC appears to be right now is beyond me. Labels: Digital media, iTunes [ Posted at 8:54 AM | Permalink ]
Friday, August 31, 2007iTunes Store To Stop Selling NBC Television ShowsApple fires back at NBC:Apple today announced that it will not be selling NBC television shows for the upcoming television season on its online iTunes Store (www.itunes.com). The move follows NBC’s decision to not renew its agreement with iTunes after Apple declined to pay more than double the wholesale price for each NBC TV episode, which would have resulted in the retail price to consumers increasing to $4.99 per episode from the current $1.99. ABC, CBS, FOX and The CW, along with more than 50 cable networks, are signed up to sell TV shows from their upcoming season on iTunes at $1.99 per episode.Yikes. Apparently, Apple isn't taking this one lying down. [ Posted at 1:14 PM | Permalink ]
NBC ends contract with Apple's iTunesReuters:NBC Universal has decided not to renew its contract to sell television shows on iTunes, becoming the second major media company to challenge Apple Inc's dominance in digital entertainment.Yikes. Could this be a publicity stunt to get a better deal? Or are the iTunes downloads just not amounting to anything? Labels: Apple, Digital media, iTunes [ Posted at 11:54 AM | Permalink ]
Thursday, August 30, 2007Sony to unplug Connect music serviceAssociated Press:Acknowledging its proprietary audio technology was a marketplace flop, Sony Corp. is shuttering its Connect digital music store and will open its portable media players to other formats.And another one bites the dust, in this case not a moment too soon. It's bad enough that Sony went with a format--ATRAC--that no one supported, but its own devices were generally woefully bad. And it's interesting to see someone jumping on board PlaysForSure amid all the recent bad news about that platform. Labels: Digital media, iTunes, Zune [ Posted at 12:56 PM | Permalink ]
Tuesday, August 21, 2007Wal-Mart to Sell Music Online Without Copyright Protections ... in MP3 FormatWall Street Journal:Wal-Mart Stores Inc. has begun selling some of its online music catalog without anticopying software, stepping up its competition with Apple Inc.'s iTunes store.I've applauded Apple's decision to offer 256 Kbps AAC tracks via iTunes, but this is of course preferable: MP3 offers much better compatibility, and Wal-Mart's files are also 256 Kbps, which is excellent quality. Finally. Labels: Digital media, iTunes [ Posted at 10:08 AM | Permalink ]
Tuesday, August 14, 2007Music: It's better than it sounds on MP3San Francisco Chronicle:The artificial audio of MP3s is quickly becoming the primary way people listen to music. Apple already has sold 100 million iPods, and more than a billion MP3 files are traded every month through the Internet.I'm always amused when people say that low-quality MP3/WMA/AAC tracks sound just fine. It literally is the audio equivalent of calling a McDonalds Happy Meal delicious. I guess it just depends on what you're used to consuming. Related: Just because it's digital, doesn't mean it sounds good Semi-related: I discovered this story through MacSurfer, which is a good (if curiously repetitive) Mac news aggregator site. They were linking to a story on The Inquirer, which is a sad little "The Register"-wannabe site from the UK that, as it turns out, simply reworded a story they had discovered on The Seattle PI. (My guess is they do that a lot.) However, even that story wasn't the original: The PI can apparently republish stories from The San Francisco Chronicle, but of course they don't link to the "original." So I went and looked for it and linked to that here. Sometimes I really wonder about the Internet. Labels: Digital media, iPod, iTunes, Zune [ Posted at 12:36 PM | Permalink ]
Wednesday, August 01, 2007iTunes Store Tops Three Billion SongsI'm obviously behind a bit, having just arrived in France, but this is still big news of course:Apple today announced that more than three billion songs have been purchased and downloaded from the iTunes Store. iTunes is the world’s most popular online music, TV and movie store featuring a catalog of over five million songs, 550 television shows and 500 movies. iTunes recently surpassed Amazon and Target to become the third largest music retailer in the US.I'm not a big fan of Apple's lousy 128 Kbps Protected AAC songs, but they've made some decent moves more recently with medium-quality (640 x ...) video and decent-quality (256 Kbps) non-protected AAC, the latter of which isn't the format I prefer, but I can live with it. Given Apple's quality-driven nature, the company should try and move toward higher-quality (HD?) video across the board where possible, and 256 Kbps or better audio across the board, even for protected music. [ Posted at 4:41 AM | Permalink ]
Monday, July 23, 2007CinemaNow updates Media Manager with Xbox 360 support, new Vista optionsArs Technica:Movie website CinemaNow has released an update to its Media Manager software that enhances the software's capability in two significant ways. Xbox 360 owners who've networked the system to a PC with Media Manager installed can now download movies to the PC and watch them on their televisions by using the XBox 360 as a pass-through device. Also available in the update is new support for the CinemaNow Burn-to-DVD feature in Windows Vista.I first tested PC-based movie services like MovieLink and CinemaNow several years ago, and long before Apple had any aspirations in the movie business, let alone music. It's astonishing to me that they're still trudging along, but then they do continue to offer features you can't get from iTunes. Labels: Digital media, iTunes [ Posted at 9:14 AM | Permalink ]
Monday, July 02, 2007Countdown to iPhone 1.01What's the over/under on the first iPhone patch? Or the next upgrade to iTunes? [ Posted at 8:59 AM | Permalink ]
Sunday, July 01, 2007iTunes 7.3So Apple released iTunes 7.3 on Friday to correspond with the release of the iPhone. But it turns out that this release actually addresses one of the most maddening flaws in the Apple TV: Previously, you couldn't stream photos to the device if it was full with your other media. Here's the Apple description:Wirelessly share digital photos from any computer in your home with Apple TVSimple, no? But this is huge, and a big deal for anyone who's been frustrated by this problem. Labels: Apple TV, iPhone, iTunes [ Posted at 2:21 PM | Permalink ]
Tuesday, June 26, 2007Apple makes two big iPhone announcementsWith the clock ticking ever closer to the iPhone release date, Apple today made two major and long-awaited announcements:AT&T and Apple Announce Simple, Affordable Service Plans for iPhone iPhone goes on sale at 6:00 p.m. (local time) on Friday, June 29 and will be sold in the US through Apple’s retail and online stores and AT&T retail stores. All iPhone monthly service plans are ... based on a new two-year service agreement with AT&T. Individual plans are priced at $59.99 for 450 minutes, $79.99 for 900 minutes and $99.99 for 1,350 minutes. All plans include unlimited data (email and web), Visual Voicemail, 200 SMS text messages, roll over minutes and unlimited mobile-to-mobile and a one-time activation fee of $36.Apple and AT&T Announce iTunes Activation and Sync for iPhone Apple and AT&T today announced that iPhone users will be able to activate their new iPhones using Apple’s popular iTunes software running on a PC or Mac computer in the comfort and privacy of their own home or office, without having to wait in a store while their phone is activated. Activating iPhone takes only minutes as iTunes guides the user through simple steps to choose their service plan, authorize their credit and activate their iPhone. Once iPhone is activated, users can then easily sync all of their phone numbers and other contact information, calendars, email accounts, web browser bookmarks, music, photos, podcasts, TV shows and movies just like they do when they sync their iPods with iTunes.That second one is truly innovative, if a bit obvious. But this really changes the landscape for purchasing a phone. I'm curious, though: Can you deactivate your iPhone through iTunes, too, just as you deactivate a computer from your iTunes Store account? Related: iPhone activation and sync video (Apple) [ Posted at 12:48 PM | Permalink ]
Monday, June 25, 2007Apple Now Third-Largest US Music RetailerReuters:Apple Inc.'s digital music store iTunes is now the third-largest music retailer in the United States with 10 percent market share, overtaking Amazon.com in the first quarter, according to a survey released Friday.This one was only a matter of time, but I'm curious that the number one and two players in this market have such low market share. It's actually possible for Apple to one day be the dominant supplier of music overall, which is astonishing. Labels: Apple, Digital media, iTunes [ Posted at 9:19 AM | Permalink ]
Monday, June 11, 2007Apple to bring rentable movies to iTunes, finallyNext, we'll see a subscription music service. WSJ reports on a development I've been asking for now for a while: Movies for rent from iTunes. After all, how many movies are really good enough to watch more than once?Apple Inc. is in talks with the Hollywood studios to make new movies available for rental for its iTunes service, according to two studio executives familiar with the matter. Labels: Apple, Digital media, iTunes [ Posted at 8:42 AM | Permalink ]
Wednesday, May 30, 2007Steve Jobs at D: All Things DigitalEngadget has nice coverage of Steve Jobs' appearance today at D. A couple of observations:- Jobs describes the new Apple as being three businesses and a "hobby." The businesses are Mac, music, and phone. The hobby, curiously, is Apple TV. This is sort of disingenuous. If the Apple TV fails, Apple can claim it was never a serious effort anyway. - Jobs got into Mac market share and was reasonably accurate, though he of course rounded up on everything. According to Jobs, the Mac has 3 percent market share worldwide (it's really 2.49 percent), 5-6 percent market share in the US (lower than I would have guessed), 12 percent market share in US notebooks, and "double digit" market share in the US consumer market share, with the caveat that "we can't really calculate the consumer market share." So that last one, presumably, is just a guess. - Jobs promised big things for the Mac at WWDC 2007, which is in early June. I've spoken to Apple about this show and will soon have an article about the company's interesting push to deal with the Windows developers who are now showing up at the event. - No new iPods any time soon, despite some stammering from Jobs that "last September" (when the last iPods were released) wasn't all that long ago. - Jobs again disingenuously claimed that there's no iPod lock-in because "if you look at the total number of iPods and total number of songs sold on iTunes, it's less than 25 per iPod." So consumers are "clearly not getting the majority of their songs from iTunes." That's not what lock-in means, however. Because iTunes is responsible for about 95 percent of all digitally sold music, and that music can only play on Apple's products, there's lock-in. Remember, Microsoft wasn't charged with a monopoly on operating systems. It was charged with a monopoly on operating systems for Intel-based PCs. Apple clearly has a monopoly on digitally sold music. Just as clear, however, is the fact that no law enforcement entity has any interest at all in calling them on that. - There was much iPhone talk, naturally. I don't care much about the iPhone, however. - YouTube on Apple TV. Yawn. Yet another extremely low-quality source of video that will look horrible on that HDTV you're using with the Apple TV. - Jobs proudly noted that there are 300 million "or more" installs of iTunes worldwide, but was then forced to admit something I've been trying to communicate for some time now: "Statistically," as Jobs put it, almost all of those are on Windows. I do give Mossberg some credit for calling Jobs on that quip. "Statistically?" Mossberg retorted. "In reality? In this dimension?" That's a nice way to tear down a meaningless response. On the flip side, I also give Jobs credit for his final comeback: "It's like giving a glass of ice water to somebody in hell." Good one. - When confronted with Apple's use of non-standard AAC instead of MP3, Jobs let loose with a whopper: "We don't own [AAC]. Anyone can license it, the majority of players out there can play it, and most of the big players out there play AAC." Those last two points are absolutely untrue. Labels: Apple, iPod, iTunes, Mac [ Posted at 5:03 PM | Permalink ]
Monday, May 14, 2007iTunes 7 DRM cracked?Or maybe it isn't. Jason O'Grady reports that it's happened:Hymn, short for Hear Your Music aNywhere has a link to an updated version of QTFairUse6 (version 2.5) that can remove the DRM from music purchased from the iTunes Store.This certainly doesn't work with iTunes content I've purchased. And of course, it's still music only: To date, there's been no crack for iTunes-purchased videos, TV shows, and movies. Labels: Digital media, iTunes [ Posted at 6:55 PM | Permalink ]
Monday, May 07, 2007Yahoo untangles licensing web for lyrics serviceReuters:A new music lyrics service launched by Yahoo illustrates the potential and the challenges of integrating lyrics into digital music products today.Two things. 1. Yahoo! Music is still in business? b. Getting lyrics with digital music would be nice, but isn't necessary. As the father of a deaf son, I'd have to say that there are far bigger issues with these services right now. For starters, how is it even legal in the US to distribute digital TV shows and movies with out closed captioning? Apple--and anyone else that does this--should be ashamed of themselves for ignoring this. Song lyrics? Pfft. Please. Let's get our priorities straight. Labels: Digital media, iTunes, Zune [ Posted at 8:36 AM | Permalink ]
Friday, April 27, 2007Looking back on the Rolling Stone interview with Steve JobsRolling Stone is a surprisingly good magazine, which I know because I've been mysteriously receiving it this year despite having never ordered or paid for it. (I assume it was a gift.) Anyway, three years ago they interviewed Steve Jobs. Here are some key excerpts, which are interesting today given how things turned out.Regarding DRM: When we first went to talk to these record companies ... we said: None of this technology that you're talking about's gonna work. We have Ph.D.'s here, that know the stuff cold, and we don't believe it's possible to protect digital content.Apple went on to make a fairly unspectacular DRM called FairPlay. However, despite its technical inferiority to Windows Media DRM, FairPlay has clearly won out in the market, thanks to the success of the iTunes Store and the iPod. Game, set, match. Regarding subscription music services: These [music subscription] services that are out there now are going to fail.Here's why: People don't want to buy their music as a subscription. They bought 45's; then they bought LP's; then they bought cassettes; then they bought 8-tracks; then they bought CD's. They're going to want to buy downloads. People want to own their music. You don't want to rent your music -- and then, one day, if you stop paying, all your music goes away.I still feel that subscription music services are a great idea, because people's musical tastes change over time, and if you're active buying music, there's no better way to find new music. Indeed, if Apple ever did add a subscription option to iTunes, it'd be a huge success, no doubt about it. Part of the problem with today's services is that they're too expensive. $15 a month is just way too much. Regarding digital music sales and success: There are approximately 800 million CD's sold in the U.S. a year, I believe. That's about 10 billion tracks, right? About 10 billion tracks in the U.S. -- sold legally. Our next milestones are to get up to 100 million tracks a year, then a quarter a billion, and then half a billion, and then a billion. And that's gonna take a little bit of time.Certainly, Apple is on the way. What hasn't happened is that digital music has yet to make up for the drop in traditional CD sales. Regarding digital movie sales: Movies are very different than music. First of all, they're a hundred times larger. There's only been one way to buy your music -- that's on a CD. Look at the ways there are to legally buy a movie -- you can see it at the theater, you can buy it on home video, you can buy on DVD. But you can also rent it at Blockbuster or Netflix. You can watch it on pay-per-view. You can also watch it on cable or network TV. There are a lot of ways to legally get a movie. There was only one way to legally get music. That's a really big difference. The distribution is much more highly evolved in the movie industry than it ever was in the music industryAnd yet, Apple jumped right into movie (and TV) sales, right after music. Though Apple is no doubt now the most popular online service for movies, it's had a slow start. The problem is, unlike music, most people don't want to watch most movies more than once. $10 to $15 for a standard definition digital movie is too much money. Regarding what happens when Microsoft copies the iPod: There are a lot of examples of people offering services, Internet-based services, that have done quite well [against Microsoft].And sure enough, Microsoft did copy iTunes, first with MSN Music, then with URGE, and then completely with Zune Marketplace. It took quite a bit of time, and Microsoft has certainly not made much of a dent in the iTunes armor so far. I guess I don't expect them to. Thanks Eddis. [ Posted at 12:41 PM | Permalink ]
Monday, April 09, 2007Microsoft Confirms Move to DRM-Free MusicMe, in WinInfo:Lost amid the hoopla over last week's EMI announcement regarding their decision to sell digital music without digital rights management (DRM) restrictions was the fact that Apple was only the first digital music reseller to sign on for the new offerings. This week, Microsoft admitted that it, too, would offer music without DRM.I was sort of amazed at how many articles about last week's EMI announcement pushed it as an Apple event. Apple was the first to sign on because they're the biggest service by far. But many others will be offering DRM-less music. I'm hoping to see at least one of them use MP3. Labels: Digital media, iTunes, Zune [ Posted at 9:51 AM | Permalink ]
100 Million iPods Sold: Let's Look to the Next 100 MillionApple celebrates an amazing milestone:Apple today announced that the 100 millionth iPod has been sold, making the iPod the fastest selling music player in history. The first iPod was sold five and a half years ago, in November 2001, and since then Apple has introduced more than 10 new iPod models, including five generations of iPod, two generations of iPod mini, two generations of iPod nano and two generations of iPod shuffle. Along with iTunes and the iTunes online music store, the iPod has transformed how tens of millions of music lovers acquire, manage and listen to their music.The market penetration of the iPod, combined with its support ecosystem of hardware add-ons, is a tech success story unlike few others. Only Windows, arguably, or the Sony PS2 during its several-years-long moment in the sun, saw such success. Absolutely astonishing. Now, it's time to look ahead. Like many, I'm eager to see an iPhone-like video iPod, preferrably with a user-removable battery. I'd like to see more and better movie content on the iTunes Store, with lower-cost options to rent (and not own) content I'll only want to watch once. I want to see Closed Captioning and subtitle support on all TV and movie content, so my son and other hearing-impaired users can finally utilize this incredible service. I'd like an Apple TV that will let me browse and buy iTunes content from the couch, and utilize DVR functionality so I can watch live and recorded TV. Put simply, there's still a lot of work to do. I'm excited for the future. Labels: Apple, Digital media, iPod, iTunes [ Posted at 9:27 AM | Permalink ]
Thursday, April 05, 2007About audio codecs (Updated)In the wake of Apple's decision to provide DRM-free versions of AAC song files via iTunes, there's been a lot of renewed interest in audio codecs, their costs, and how they're licensed. Not surprisingly, my go-to guy for this kind of information, Dave Caulton, has been documenting this stuff on his Zunester blog. I'd like to summarize that information, and some other related details, here.First, the codecs. With due respect to the Ogg crowd, there are really only three codecs that matter today: MP3 (or as I call it, The One True Format), WMA (Windows Media Audio), and AAC (Advanced Audio Codec). Microsoft, of course, created and licenses WMA. Apple utilizes (but did not create) AAC. Contrary to popular belief, MP3 is not free, but because it is so pervasive (or as Dave notes, what we might call the JPEG of audio formats), all audio devices and software can work with this format. WMA is supported by far more device and software types than AAC, due to its very low licensing costs (see below), but AAC is arguably more pervasive now from a numbers standpoint, due to the success of the iPod and iTunes, both of which are AAC-compatible. Regarding licensing costs, WMA is the least expensive of the three, though that's become increasingly irrelevant. The licensing fee for WMA is just 10 cents per unit, but there is a maximum cost of just $400,000. Thrifty. MP3 is in the middle, from a cost perspective. The MP3 licensing cost for portable devices is 75 cents per device. AAC is the most expensive, at least for low-volume licensees, which explains why you see so few AAC-compatible devices. The cost structure is tiered as followed: For devices that sell less than 400,000 units per year, the cost is $1.00 per unit. At 400,001 to 2 million units, the cost is 74 cents per unit. Over 2 million units, the cost is less expensive. (Anyone have a number?) Update: A reader ("yawn" by name) provided this link to Via's AAC licensing fees. Not surprisingly, it's tiered and confusing. (As opposed to tired and confusing, I guess.) Licensing cost comparison: 250,000 units WMA: $25,000 MP3: $187,500 AAC: $250,000 500,000 units WMA: $50,000 MP3: $375,000 AAC: $370,000 1,000,000 units WMA: $100,000 MP3: $750,000 AAC: $740,000 But wait, there's more: Dave also notes that MP3 actually comes with a content distribution fee as well, which is sort of amazing (in a bad way): The Thompson site says you pay 2% of revenues from a service - or $0.02/song - to use mp3 in a service. The last time I saw a content distribution fee, it was on mpeg-4 part 2, and it pretty much killed that standard. Thankfully, in h.264 mpeg dropped that requirement for free distribution.From a quality perspective, both AAC and WMA offer dramatic compression benefits over MP3. However, because of MP3's pervasiveness and the low cost of storage, this has never really translated into much of an issue for users. AAC and WMA offer roughly equivalent quality at the same bit-rates. Windows Media DRM is the most widely licensed DRM scheme, from a number of licensees perspective. Apple does not license its FairPlay DRM scheme, but since the iPod and iTunes are so popular, it is arguably the most widely-used DRM scheme today (from a digital file format perspective). Comparing DRM licensing fees is thus pointless, as you couldn't license FairPlay if you wanted to. (There's been one exception, of course: Motorola's RAZR iTunes-compatible phones.) Finally, Apple's decision to offer 256 Kbps AAC files via iTunes does not mean that all DRM-free songs sold in the coming years and months will be in AAC format. Other services will be able to offer these songs in other formats, including DRM-free MP3 and WMA, and no doubt will. So while I applaud Apple for offering DRM-free songs, I will likely look elsewhere for this music, not because of quality issues (256 Kbps AAC is excellent) but because of compatibility issues: As a Media Center user, especially, and someone who wants to keep my options open going forward, I will always seek out MP3 when possible. When it's not possible, I purchase from high-quality services, burn to CD, and re-rip back to the PC in MP3 format. I will now be able to do this with Apple's 256 Kbps AAC songs. It's not possible with the current 128 Kbps files, because of the resulting unacceptable loss in quality that occurs during the conversion process. Update: A number of readers point out that iTunes can actually convert AAC files to MP3 (and vice versa). What it does is use the format you set up in the application's Import format settings. This is obviously better than burning and re-ripping, so if this works with Apple's DRM-less AAC files, well, bravo: I'll be all over that. So I'm expecting some pushback. Invariably, people get agitated by the fine points of any discussion like this. I'm interested in keeping this accurate, but I'm not interested in your religious beliefs (aka "but AAC is a million times more efficient than WMA"). If you have a valuable and accurate correction to make, I'm listening. Labels: Apple, Digital media, iPod, iTunes, Microsoft [ Posted at 10:20 AM | Permalink ]
Wednesday, April 04, 2007Recording Industry is the Culprit, EU SaysMe, in WinInfo:A day after revealing that it had sent a statement of objections to Apple and the four largest record companies, European Union (EU) antitrust regulators said that the recording industry was the real target of its charges. The EU has alleged that the recording industry and Apple are engaged in unfair pricing of songs sold via Apple's iTunes Store.I have to admit, when Apple immediately fingered the recording industry yesterday, I found that a tad off, given that they're partners and so forth. But clearly the EU agrees. My guess is we're going to see standardized pricing across the EU shortly. [ Posted at 9:53 AM | Permalink ]
Tuesday, April 03, 2007EU Reveals Apple Antitrust InvestigationMe, in WinInfo:Today, the European Union (EU) announced it was investigating Apple for antitrust violations related to the pricing of music sold via its iTunes Store service. The European Commission (EC) has sent a statement of objections to Apple, spelling out how the company and the four major recording companies who supply it with music are violating EU antitrust laws.My take on this is simple: This is no big deal. If the EU were to investigate Apple's tying of the iPod and iTunes and its effect on the company both acquiring and maintaining a monopoly in the digital music space--which, frankly, you could make a case for--then we'd have a Microsoft-style legal mess on our hands. But this does seem to be the record companies' problem, not Apple's. Labels: Apple, Digital media, iPod, iTunes [ Posted at 10:40 AM | Permalink ]
Monday, April 02, 2007More than you ever wanted to know about audio formatsThanks to David Caulton for reminding the world that, no, AAC is not an open standard:Thought I'd lay out some fundamental facts about a few audio formats - some comments show some common misperceptions.I'd add that the DRM-protected versions of AAC (Apple) and WMA (everyone else) are essentially separate formats from a compatibility standpoint. That is, just because a device or piece of software supports AAC doesn't mean that it also supports Fairplay-enhanced protected AAC (from iTunes). Labels: Apple, Digital media, iPod, iTunes, Microsoft, Zune [ Posted at 6:17 PM | Permalink ]
EMI Drops DRM, iTunes First to Sign OnMe, in WinInfo:Music giant EMI this morning announced that it would be releasing its entire catalog without digital rights management (DRM) restrictions, the first of the four largest music companies to do so. In addition, EMI announced that Apple's iTunes would be the first online music service to sell these unrestricted files starting in May.Related: Apple Unveils Higher Quality DRM-Free Music on the iTunes Store Labels: Apple, Digital media, iPod, iTunes [ Posted at 8:48 AM | Permalink ]
EMI Uveils Plan to Sell Music Without Anticopying SoftwareWSJ:In a major break with the music industry's longstanding antipiracy strategy, EMI Group PLC announced today that it plans to sell significant amounts of its catalog without anticopying software.Ah well. No Beatles, not today. However: EMI is going for premium downloads. They will be free from DRM and will offer vastly improved sound quality, something I've been asking for for years. They will come at a premium, which I think I'm OK with, though I'd note that all WMA-based digital stores already offer better quality than iTunes. Some even offer lossless music. Labels: Apple, Digital media, iTunes [ Posted at 8:23 AM | Permalink ]
Thursday, March 29, 2007Apple TV hacks hackersIf this is true, Apple has just caused my rethinking of Apple TV to be quite temporary:We thought it was too good to be true. Mysterious goings-on have put an end to happy hackers' tinkering with Apple TV.Sigh. Well, that's a shame. After writing my Apple TV review and being, frankly, unimpressed by the device, the quick rise in Apple TV hacks had me believing, briefly, that Apple actually had a master plan with the Apple TV: Slip a tiny OS X-based box into the world's living rooms and let the hackers go nuts. Overnight, this device would become so much more useful because an amazing ecosystem would arise around it. Too bad it's not true. As it stands, Apple TV is what I said it was originally: An overpriced way to to get iTunes video content into your den. And it's unclear that there's a huge market for that, especially when you consider the lack of content on Apple's service. My guess is that this is all about making the Apple TV appear "safe" to content makers. Related: Apple vs Apple TV Mod’rs Labels: Apple, Digital media, iPod, iTunes [ Posted at 11:19 AM | Permalink ]
Apple Offers Album DiscountsMe, in WinInfo:After arguing for years that the success of its iTunes Store rests on low, standardized pricing, Apple on Wednesday unveiled a new feature of the online service, called Complete My Album, that was directly requested by the music industry. Users who purchase individual songs on iTunes can now buy the rest of the album via the service for a discounted price.Related: The Album, a Commodity in Disfavor (NYT): The industry is straining to shore up the album as long as possible, in part by prodding listeners who buy one song to purchase the rest of a collection. Apple, in consultation with several labels, has been planning to offer iTunes users credit for songs they have already purchased if they then choose to buy the associated album in a certain period of time, according to people involved in the negotiations. (Under Apple’s current practice, customers who buy a song and then the related album effectively pay for the song twice). Labels: Apple, Digital media, iPod, iTunes [ Posted at 10:38 AM | Permalink ]
Tuesday, March 27, 2007Apple TV Hard Drive Upgrade TutorialApple TV Hacks:Here it is, a step by step tutorial on upgrading your Apple TV harddrive.This and the numerous other Apple TV hacks that are appearing are clearly a huge differentiator for the device, though they don't make up for its shortcomings, at least not yet. Apple had to know this would be part of the appeal of the Apple TV. Good stuff. "Hard drive" is not one word, by the way. :) Labels: Apple, Digital media, iPod, iTunes [ Posted at 10:45 AM | Permalink ]
Sunday, March 25, 2007Paul Thurrott's Apple TV review... (Part 2)I guess I should respond to the other mistakes in John Malloy's scathing attack on my Apple TV review too. It won't be hard:Now Paul, you are just being naughty - the retail price of the XBOX is 100 bucks more for the version without the hard drive ($399) and a good 200 bucks more for the version with the 20 gig drive ($499).Actually, the Xbox 360 is $299, the same price as the Apple TV. This hard drive-less version works just fine as a Media Center Extender, as I wrote. I know this because I've got one in my den right now, and it's my family's sole interface to TV content. You can spend $399 (not $499) on the premium version of the console (with hard drive) if you want, but it's not necessary for media sharing or Media Center Extender use. Also as a media centre the XBOX is an enormous PC with big BOY connections and is as loud as can be imagined.The Xbox is absolutely louder than the Apple TV, but I mentioned that. However, when using the Media Center Extender feature, it's much quieter than when you're playing games. And unlike the Apple TV, it can perform a variety of useful functions like playing DVD movies, playing HD-DVD movies with an optional $200 add-on, accessing online movie services like MovieLink without having to get up and go back to the PC or Mac in your home office, access its own online TV show and movie service (again, without having to leave the couch), and so on. Of course, I mention that all in my review. Yeah, it's louder. And that's about it. To summarize: - John says that you can't expect Paul Thurrott of SuperSite for Windows fame to write fair reviews of Apple products, despite much evidence to the contrary. - The base Xbox 360 is the same price as the Apple TV but provides much, much more value, despite John's assertions and price mistakes designed to make Apple's product look cheaper. - John's right: The Xbox 360 is louder than the Apple TV. I'd add that the Apple TV runs quite hot (I also mentioned this in my review), and is, in fact, too hot to touch after being in use for a while. This is a concern but, I felt, with no proof there was no reason to believe it will result in unreliability issues. Time will tell. - For whatever it's worth, the Xbox comes with cables to connect to a TV, unlike Apple TV, which comes with no cables. The connections you make, however, will ultimately be the same or similar for each device. Wow, I really am unreasonable. Labels: Apple, Digital media, iPod, iTunes [ Posted at 11:55 AM | Permalink ]
Saturday, March 24, 2007Apple TV ReviewMe, in SuperSite for Windows:Apple TV is another way to enjoy the content you manage by iTunes, and a natural evolution of the work Apple has done with the iPod. It's not the first to utilize a TV--you can easily connect most modern iPods to your TV with an optional dock and set of cables (and, incidentally, duplicate almost everything the Apple TV does at a lower cost)--but it is the first Apple device designed specifically and exclusively for the living room. And while it is missing some very key functionality that would make this device far more compelling, it's not a horrible first attempt.I wanted to love the Apple TV but it's just too limited. The big problem, of course, is that it can't replace anything in your living room. Instead, you just add it to the already crowded home theater setup and it becomes yet another device to manage and spend money on. Sorry, but that's not that exciting. [ Posted at 5:15 PM | Permalink ]
Thursday, March 22, 2007Setting up and using Apple TVAnd, finally, some pictures of the Apple TV user interface, during both setup and in general use...![]()
Accessing Apple TV from iTunesHere are some pictures of iTunes interacting with an AppleTV:![]()
Apple TV arrivesYikes, is this thing small. Some pictures...![]() Labels: Apple, Digital media, iPod, iTunes [ Posted at 9:41 AM | Permalink ]
Tuesday, March 20, 2007A month late, Apple TV finally ships from ChinaMy Apple TV has shipped:Hello Paul Thurrott,[ Posted at 10:11 AM | Permalink ]
Sunday, March 18, 2007QuickTime gains 720P Apple TV high-definition export modeiLounge:In an undisclosed and largely unnoticed update to its QuickTime video playback and conversion software, Apple has quietly added an “Export to Apple TV” feature capable of creating high-definition videos viewable on the Apple TV accessory. Unlike Export to iPod, which currently creates sub-DVD-quality 640 by 480 videos, Export to Apple TV creates not only full DVD-quality 720 by 404 videos, but also 1280 by 720 videos. These videos are viewable in iTunes, but cannot be transferred directly via iTunes to an fifth-generation iPod.Sweet! [ Posted at 8:43 PM | Permalink ]
iTunes and Windows VistaApple updates its Vista advisory for iTunes 7.1.1:Apple has released a new version of iTunes that addresses a number of compatibility issues with Windows Vista. iTunes 7.1.1 is recommended for use with most editions of Windows Vista, however, Apple is actively working with Microsoft to resolve a few remaining known issues. This document will be updated as more information becomes available.From what I can tell, iTunes 7.1.1. didn't actually fix any of the Vista compatibility issues that were remaining when iTunes 7.1 shipped. As Apple noted, iTunes 7.1.1. fixes "a stability issue and minor compatibility problems" only. [ Posted at 1:36 PM | Permalink ]
Friday, March 16, 2007iTunes 7.1.1 for Mac and WindowsApple:iTunes 7.1.1 addresses a stability issue and minor compatibility problems in iTunes 7.1.It doesn't get any briefer than that. Download for Mac (28 MB) Download for Windows (36.1 MB) Labels: iTunes [ Posted at 2:29 PM | Permalink ]
Wednesday, March 14, 2007EU consumer chief sounds a softer iTunes noteReuters:The European Union's consumer chief has downplayed her views on Apple, backing off the line that its iTunes online music store must become more compatible with other formats.That last bit is interesting. I'm pretty sure that the overall importance of a nascent market like digital music outweighs raw observations like the size of the current market, but it's curious that that's even a qualification. It's OK to own a monopoly as long as the market you're dominating isn't big? [ Posted at 8:07 PM | Permalink ]
Monday, March 12, 2007The Ides of March are upon us ... Will Apple TV ever ship?When Apple announced very late last month that Apple TV would be delayed from "February" to "mid-March," I had this sneaking suspicion that even that vague date was unrealistic. As you may recall, I had ordered an Apple TV the minute Apple's online store came online after the Jobs MacWorld keynote in January, and my order's ship date was changed to March 20 on February 27 (with a "delivers by" date of March 23, which isn't exactly "mid-March," but whatever). So once again, I'm wondering if it's really going to happen. Surely, Apple would have delayed the order by now if they knew March 20 wasn't doable. Surely. [ Posted at 9:48 AM | Permalink ]
Sunday, March 11, 2007European consumer chief takes aim at iTunesReuters:European Union consumer chief Meglena Kuneva has hit out at Apple Inc.'s bundling of its popular iPod music players and its iTunes online music store, according to German weekly magazine Focus.Whether you care to look at this from a competitive or consumer advocacy standpoint--either is valid, I'd say--this is an issue that's coming to a head. Apple is reaching that ugly monopoly point, where the rules change. Just ask Microsoft. Of course, there's also an argument to be made that Microsoft is now a shadow of its former self, afraid of competing aggressively. Like most things in life, there's no black and white. But I agree, things have to change. [ Posted at 1:57 PM | Permalink ]
Friday, March 09, 2007Music's New GatekeeperI subscribe to the online version of the Wall Street Journal, but I actually received the print version today in error (no doubt a substitution carrier) and noticed a fantastic article looking behind the scenes at Apple's iTunes operation. Looking at the Web version of the site, I would have absolutely missed this otherwise. It's a great read:Every day, the roughly one million people who visit the iTunes Store home page are presented with several dozen albums, TV shows and movie downloads to consider buying -- out of the four million such goods the Apple site offers. This prime promotion is analogous to a CD being displayed at the checkout stands of all 940 Best Buy stores or featured on the front page of Target's ad circular.Related: Print version of the above article ![]()
Tuesday, March 06, 2007iTunes 7.1 for Windows Vista: The Good, the Bad, the UglySigh.I was so excited that Apple was finally addressing Vista incompatibility issues in iTunes. So I downloaded iTunes 7.1, hoping for the best. Here's what I found: Good The Coverflow feature in iTunes 7.1 sports a full-screen mode now, which is really nice looking. ![]() iTunes 7.1 also supports the Apple TV, though it will be a few weeks, at least, before we can test that. ![]() Bad Though iTunes appears to sport Vista-style Minimize, Maximize/Restore, and Close window buttons, they're just fakes. They don't "light up" like real Vista buttons, no doubt because Apple is doing its own custom application rendering. Ah well. ![]() Ugly After running iTunes 7.1 for the first time, you have to wait a long time while it updates your library. Then, when it completes, you'll discover that it deleted a bunch of your album art! WTF. Ah well. At least there's some progress here. [ Posted at 11:13 AM | Permalink ]
iTunes and Windows VistaSome good news from Apple:Apple has released a new version of iTunes that addresses a number of compatibility issues with Windows Vista. iTunes 7.1 is recommended for use with most editions of Windows Vista, however, Apple is actively working with Microsoft to resolve a few remaining known issues.It's not perfect yet, I guess. Apple points out a few remaining issues, and says its working with Microsoft to resolve them. [ Posted at 10:10 AM | Permalink ]
Amazon Unbox 1.5So, Amazon has shipped a new version of its Unbox TV/movie download service. The first version was so horrible I demanded my money back and erased the thing from my PC. It's unlikely I'll ever be brave enough to try it again, but here's what's new:- 20% faster downloads - Improved reliability and performance - 50% faster application load time - Reduced PC memory usage - Full support for Windows Vista and Vista Media Center Edition - Improved portable device support - Download portable video files only when you want to! - New user controls and settings - Video brightness control - Contrast control - Video library organizational and sorting - Optional tooltips - Multiple file delete Hmm. There's no such thing as Vista Media Center Edition. I see Amazon is up to its usual high standards. Labels: Digital media, iTunes, Vista [ Posted at 9:40 AM | Permalink ]
Monday, March 05, 2007Download DVD Specification Gets ApprovalIDG News:A technology that allows movies to be downloaded and burned to blank DVDs using the same content-protection system as commercial discs received official approval on Thursday.We're getting there. Slowly. Labels: Digital media, iTunes [ Posted at 3:40 PM | Permalink ]
Thursday, March 01, 2007Blockbuster in Talks To Acquire MovielinkWSJ:Movie-rental giant Blockbuster Inc. is in advanced talks to acquire Movielink LLC, an online movie-downloading company owned by the major Hollywood studios, according to people familiar with the matter.This is actually pretty huge. Mac-oriented people won't appreciate this, though they'll think Apple invented it when Apple TV comes out, but here's something I do all the time: We have an Xbox 360 connected to our largest TV (and a 5.1 home theater setup). We now use this Xbox as our primary TV interface, thanks to its Media Center Extender software, which connects to a Windows Vista-based Media Center PC (and cable box) back in my office. Using this interface, my kids watch recorded and live TV shows, and we access our entire photo, music, and video collections, all stored on the PC and server in the office. OK, fine. But we also rent movies via MovieLink, and it works seamlessly. It's unclear why MovieLink (and related services like CinemaNow) hav |