More of my sites

WinInfo Daily News
SuperSite for Windows
Windows IT Pro Magazine
Connected Home
Thurrott Dot Com
Windows Weekly at TWIT


About this site

For six years, the Internet Nexus served as my technology blog, but I've since started blogging at the SuperSite Blog instead. If you're looking for the blog, please head there. --Paul



Coming soon: Everything Must Go

The next edition of "Everything Must Go" will be appearing here soon. --Paul



Thursday, September 20, 2007

NBC to Offer Downloads of Its Shows

The New York Times:
NBC Universal said yesterday that it would soon permit consumers to download many of NBC’s most popular programs free to personal computers and other devices for one week immediately after their broadcasts.

The service, which is set to start in November after a test period in October, comes less than three weeks after NBC Universal said it was pulling its programs out of the highly successful iTunes service of Apple Inc. That partnership fell apart because of a dispute over Apple’s iTunes pricing policies and what NBC executives said were concerns about lack of piracy protection.

The files, which would be downloaded overnight to home computers, would contain commercials that viewers would not be able to skip through. And the file would not be transferable to a disk or to another computer.

In a second phase of the NBC rollout, customers would pay a fee for downloads of episodes that they would then own, and the files would be transferable to other devices. NBC hopes to offer this service by mid-2008, depending on how quickly the company can put in place the secure software necessary to allow payment by credit card.

The latter system is what is already available through iTunes.
This whole thing is stupid, which is pretty much all I have to say on this.

Moving on, I just have to comment on a semi-related topic. We subscribe to the print version of The New York Times, and it's one of two newspapers I read each day. (The other is the increasingly uninteresting Boston Globe.) For some reason I can't honestly fathom, the NBC story noted here was on the front page of the newspaper today, and not just on the front page, but on the top of the front page. Meanwhile, a story about Dan Rather suing CBS News for violating his contract and prematurely ending his career there is relegated to Business section of the paper, despite allegations of evidence that might exonerate him in part regarding his role in a report about US president Bush's National Guard service. This was a major national news story. NBC posting Web downloads of its TV shows, obviously, is not. What the frick is up with The New York Times?

Labels: ,

[ Posted at 9:01 AM | Permalink ]

 

Wil Shipley wakes up to Apple lock-in

Delicious Monster author Wil Shipley wakes up to what I've been complaining about for quite some time now:
The iPhone is a closed system, like the iPods before it, so third parties can only develop software for it if they are EXTREMELY close to Apple. This is an incredibly frightening trend. As Apple gets more and more of its revenue from non-Mac devices, they are also getting more and more of their revenue from devices that simply exclude third parties.

On iPods, Airports, Apple TVs, and now iPhones, Apple wants every app perfect. Which is nice, in theory. In practice, it means innovation only happens at Apple's pace. The marketplace of ideas is much smaller, and the devices are much poorer because of it. (Example: Why can't I stream music from my iPhone or iPod touch to my Airport Express?)

[With] the latest iPods Apple [have] gone a step further, and disabled some docking stations that don't have a special chip in them provided by Apple; forcing customers to use only Apple-approved accessories. Apple's emulating the most pernicious qualities of Nintendo and the Microsoft XBox -- you pay us a tax or you don't work with our systems.

Apple's "approval" just comes from Apple getting a cut. It's a measure of greed, not quality. We're not talking about THX-certification here, we're talking about extortion. This kind of lock-in seems very appealing for the company doing the locking early on, but it always, ALWAYS ends up biting the company in the butt.

Then we come to ringtones. Every phone I've owned in the last ten years has allowed to make my own ringtones. But since Apple is so close to the record companies, and they are already so grumpy with Apple, Apple did a deal that benefits record companies and Apple. Not artists, certainly not consumers.

A million customers don't get to do something cool with their iPhones. Because of greed.

Now we see that iPod owners who upgrade to a newer iPod must re-buy the games they've already bought, because the new iPods are incompatible with the old. No credit given for having already bought an identical game.

Steve ... give up on trying to control everything. It's only going to keep hurting Apple, more and more, to control content and hardware and software. It's going to make them into the kind of mega-monopoly that we always, ALWAYS end up hating. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. 100% of the time.

Apple should license FairPlay, or allow iPods to play PlaysForSure music. Either one. Basically, Apple should allow other music stores to sell DRM'ed music that works on iPods and iPhones.
Wil, welcome to the party. I'm saddened it took you years and several Apple product release waves and strategy moves to agree that the company is engaged in lock-in at the expense of consumers, but whatever. Here you are.

I'd like to reference again my recent comments about Apple and what should be a very damaging antitrust inquiry if there's any justice in the world. This isn't about "anti-Apple." It's about "pro-consumer." Some don't get this, but people matter more than corporations.

BTW, even John Gruber is seeing this issue pretty clearly now, at least with regards to ringtones:
Faced with the choice between doing what’s right for customers or charging them money for something they shouldn’t need to pay for, Apple chose the latter. There is no middle ground. And any business that hinges on your customers “not knowing any better” is a bad business.
Thanks Jerry.

Labels: , , ,

[ Posted at 8:33 AM | Permalink ]

 

Wednesday, September 19, 2007

Apple defends iTunes in Berlin, Brussels

Reuters:
Apple President Steve Jobs reiterated his commitment to charging the same price for iTunes downloads across Europe as his lawyers defended the company on Wednesday against allegations its prices are not uniform.

"We think prices should be the same. We think anybody in Europe should buy off any store," Jobs told a press conference in Berlin, which he visited in connection with an iPhone deal.

At the same time, Apple officials were defending the company in Brussels.

The Commission charged in April that Vivendi's Universal Music Group, Sony BMG Music Entertainment, EMI Group and Warner Music Group were forcing Apple to curtail cross-border access to iTunes.
Now that the EU's case against Microsoft was found to be basically flawless, you can expect regulators there to turn their attention to other computer industry near-monopolies, most notably Apple (with the iPod and iTunes) and Google (with online search, or, more appropriately, online advertising). Apple fans are curiously militaristic in their defense of the company along these lines, but bundling is bundling, and if the EU made Microsoft decouple Windows Media Player from Windows, you can pretty much expect the same treatment of the iPod and iTunes.

This issue cited above is, of course, about pricing of music online. But this is how cans of worms get opened. Stay tuned.

Related: Time for Apple to face the music?

Labels: , ,

[ Posted at 5:43 PM | Permalink ]

 

Sunday, September 16, 2007

Is Apple TV an iFlop?

Forbes takes a look at a product Apple seems to have all but ignored since it was first released last year:

iTV is a flat-out iFlop. Renamed Apple TV upon launch, the ballyhooed box has sold perhaps 250,000 units--far behind the 1 million sold for the iPhone, which was priced twice as high and has been on the market less than half as long. Apple ... provides detailed sales data for the iPod and other digital wonders but won't reveal any numbers for Apple TV; apparently the truth is too humiliating.

Jobs' own ambivalence about the iFlop, however, is evident. At a tech conference in May Jobs took the stage and casually dismissed Apple TV as merely "a hobby." In briefing Wall Street on quarterly earnings on July 25, Apple execs ignored the video product.

Jobs confined Apple TV to handling only the content you could get through Apple's own iTunes. This parochial and proprietary approach, in an increasingly open, Internet-infused world, had relegated the company's Macintosh line to a narrow slice of sales. Yet it also had let the iPod dominate online music, which may be why Jobs believed he could pull off the same thing in video. Wrong.

So here's the thing. In the days leading up to the Apple TV's release, I bemoaned the fact that it lacked DVR capabilities and thus could never be real competition for Microsoft's excellent Media Center software (available since 2002) and Media Center Extender hardware (available since 2004). That's still true today, and as I noted in my review of the Apple TV, the device is really just "an iPod designed for your living room instead of your pocket. It is simply yet another way to consume content purchased from Apple's nearly-ubiquitous iTunes Store." I award the thing 3 out of 5 stars and declared that it is "big on hype but short on functionality."

 

But is it a flop?

 

Maybe. I do like the idea of the Apple TV, though again, it's hugely diminished without DVR functionality. If you've completely bought into the Apple digital media ecosystem, it works pretty well. But even then there are limitations: You still can't buy any HD content on iTunes, relegating the box's 720p display capabilities moot. And if you rip your own DVDs to MPEG-4 or H.264 you have some choices to make, as the Apple TV can play back 640 x whatever movies aimed at the iPod, but the reverse isn't true of the slightly higher-resolution movies the Apple TV supports, but the iPod does not. The whole thing is kind of a mess. Technologically, the Apple TV is a mixed bag.

 

If these sales figures are to be believed, the Apple TV is a sales flop as well. If this were Microsoft, we'd all knowingly nod our heads at the notion that the company would simply issue a few upgrades and eventually get it right. But this is Apple, which tends to bolt from defeats, especially the high profile ones, as quickly as possible.And that's a shame, because the Apple TV could have turned into a cool product. For me, the most damning evidence that this will never happen is Jobs himself and his comments about it being "a hobby". It's just too bad.

Labels: , , ,

[ Posted at 1:28 PM | Permalink ]

 

Tuesday, September 11, 2007

Argh.... Ringtones still don't work (properly)

So after posting all those shots I actually completed syncing the iPhone ... and get this message:


WTF. It plays fine in iTunes.

Update: You have to play the ringtone version in iTunes before it will sync. (Not the song.) Sorry, but this isn't obvious at all. This system is just broken as-is. There is no way normal people can use this easily.

Labels: ,

[ Posted at 10:22 AM | Permalink ]

 

Making a ringtone with iTunes 7.4.x

Full-sized images at source:

Labels: ,

[ Posted at 10:14 AM | Permalink ]

 

iTunes ringtones go live ... sort of

So I discovered this morning that the new Ringtones feature is live in iTunes 7.4.x, sort of: My only attempt thus far at making a ringtone has ended in the following error:

Could not create ringtone. An unknown error occurred (-42160).
There was an error in the iTunes Store. Please try again later.
OK

No big deal. But the ringtone creation process has revealed a glaring issue with this process. Not only do you have to find a ringtone-able song in the iTunes Store, but you don't actually get full ringtone making capabilities for your $1.98. What you get is the right to edit the song once, online, and make a short clip. You can't go back and make a different ringtone from the same song if you don't like the first one, without paying for it yet again. So that additional 99 cent fee just covers a single online editing experience, and one 15-second ringtone.

Obviously, I'm not a big ringtone buyer. But this seems kind of silly to me.

I'll have pictures in a bit.

Update: I bought a new song and got it to work. Again, pictures soon.

Labels: ,

[ Posted at 9:48 AM | Permalink ]

 

Monday, September 10, 2007

Jumping the iShark

The New York Times touches on the topic du jour:
Let me get this straight: Steve Jobs insists that songs on iTunes cost 99 cents and television episodes cost $1.99 because consumers crave simple pricing.

Except, of course, when it comes to Apple’s own products.

There were wrinkles created by all the dynamic pricing. Customers who paid $599 when the iPhone came out two months ago saw their status drop from early adopter to, well, sucker, after Mr. Jobs cut the price of the device by a third. After Mr. Jobs was crucified for playing it too cute on the so-called “Jesus phone,” he issued a non-apology apology and a $100 store credit to help those early buyers salvage some dignity.

A pricing error? Absolutely. And when you think about it, the media companies Mr. Jobs is fighting with want the opportunity to make the same mistake.

Apple saying it would not carry television shows from the coming NBC season because the network wanted double the $1.99 price and NBC saying that was not true.

“Apple is not telling the truth. We never asked to double the wholesale price of our shows," said Cory Shields, a spokesman for NBC Universal. “Our negotiations were centered on our request for flexibility in wholesale pricing, including the ability to package shows together in ways that could make our content even more attractive for consumers.”
This is interesting on a number of levels.

First, the hypocrisy thing is pretty obvious.

Second, that NBC has made its shows available on Amazon Unbox for less than they sold on iTunes is telling.

Finally, the "sucker" comment closely resembles the "stooge" line I used the other day. I guess we're on the same page when it comes to the gotta-have-it gadget crowd and the Monday morning quarterbacking scenario where people have actually argued that they've gotten $200 of value out of the past two months of iPhone use. Egads.

Labels: , , , ,

[ Posted at 1:33 PM | Permalink ]

 

Saturday, September 08, 2007

iTunes 7.4 obsolete after 48 hours

TUAW:
There are apps that age gracefully, staying functional and relevant for months or years with no changes at all... and then there's iTunes. We had only hours to get used to a new version with support for all the iPods coming down the pike, and then in don't-blink-or-you'll-miss-it fashion, 7.4 was gone and 7.4.1 was here. Wheel in the sky, keep on turning.

Apple hasn't listed specific changes between 7.4 and 7.4.1...
OK, I get it, you think I'm an Apple basher. Whatever. It does crack me up that Apple fans are the first to rag on everything Microsoft does wrong, but Apple gets a total pass with their shoddy software, which is often updated, again and again, after new versions are released. (Witness the rapid succession of iLife '08 updates this past month.)

But iTunes is unreal. I use it regularly, and have come to rely on it, but... My God. And it's not just the bugginess. The performance is miserable, across the board. Double-click a video file and wait... and wait... and wait.. while it loads. The worst, of course, is photo sync with an iPod. Not only does iTunes create completely different "optimized" photos for each iPod you sync with, the process is agonizingly slow. I started syncing the iPod classic last night at dinner time, and when I got up this morning, it was about 1/3 done. Seriously. Yeah, there are a lot of photos. (8000 or so.) So what? It shouldn't take that long. Now I'm going to do it in batches over a few nights so the iPod's screen doesn't burn-in or burn out (it stays on and displays a static screen during this entire process) and so my computer is usable: The thing just kills performance while it's syncing.

I don't think it's bashing to point out very real problems. I like iTunes quite a bit. But as with Firefox, I'm concerned that a tool I use regularly is getting slower and slower and slower as it gains more and more new features. This is a serious problem.

And why the heck do I have to restart my computer after upgrading from iTunes 7.4 to 7.4.1? Good grief.

Labels:

[ Posted at 1:10 PM | Permalink ]

 

Sunday, September 02, 2007

Sync iTunes, Windows Media Player, and Zune

I manage my master music collection through iTunes in Windows Vista, but maintain links to this collection in both Windows Media Player 11 and Zune so that I can sync that music with non-Apple devices. This works pretty well, though you have to manually update album art and perform other housekeeping tasks, especially in WMP, fairly often. Turns out there's a better way.

If you're a Windows-based iTunes user, or someone looking to sync music meta data between iTunes and Windows Media Player/Media Center, you need to download a cool utility called MusicBridge immediately. MusicBridge offers manual one-way sync (in either direction) between iTunes and WMP of...

- General meta data

- Album art

- Ratings (!!!)

- Playlists

And you can export and import ratings (from iTunes) to and from XML. This is an amazing tool, and highly recommended. It's amazing seeing my very thorough iTunes ratings appear, perfectly, in WMP. The only problem is that the process is manual: You have to sync these things individually, and it's not automated. No problem: MusicBridge works grea, and MusicBridge could easily be used to migrate a music collection from iTunes to WMP, or from WMP to iTunes.

On the Zune side, the Zune desktop software actually includes everything you need to sync with iTunes and/or WMP, but you have to enable it: Just Access go to Monitor Folders (Options -> Library -> More Options -> Monitor Folders) and check the option titled "Add files, playlists, and ratings from another media player to library" in the Add Folders to Library dialog. Then click OK and it will all be blasted right into Zune, and kept up-to-date automatically.

The end result is that iTunes, Zune, and WMP now contain nearly identical copies of my music library right now. It's a lot closer to what I've been looking for than I had imagined was possible without a lot of work and duplication. I've been playing with this stuff all weekend, along with some related tools for accessing AAC files from WMP (and thus Media Center, but not Media Center Extender) and removing DRM from iTunes-purchased songs, so they can be used with other players and devices. I may write this stuff up soon, it's really kind of fantastic.

Labels: , ,

[ Posted at 1:36 PM | Permalink ]

 

Saturday, September 01, 2007

Apple, why can't I buy this album?

I've been trying to download John Lennon's greatest hits album, Legend, via iTunes Plus for weeks now. I always get this error (on both Mac and Windows):


Why can't I buy this album, Apple?

Labels: ,

[ Posted at 9:05 AM | Permalink ]

 

But seriously folks...

So I had a little fun yesterday with this whole NBC/Apple thing. The truth is, this is pretty serious, if you'll accept the notion that anything entertainment related can truly be serious. It's serious because this will impact the way that content is digitally delivered to us in the future, and as technophiles, we should be at the forefront of this discussion. Here's what I really think about this topic...

First, we have to take all of the public statements that Apple and NBC have said at face value. Yes, both companies are clearly jockeying for position here. But let's assume everything they say, on both sides, is true.

NBC is wrong. When it comes to music downloads, I provisionally back the notion of tiered pricing, largely because I'm an old guy and much of what I want to buy is of the back catalog nature, and would thus be lowered priced as a result. (I wouldn't care if the new Brittney Spears single is $1.99 instead of $.99, or whatever. As far as I'm concerned, that's not music anyway and I'm not interested.) My particular wants and needs aside, however, tiered pricing can be used to screw the consumer, obviously, and in the case of TV shows, the prices can get quite high. And if Apple is correct is saying that NBC wanted to price new TV show episodes--single TV show episodes--at $4.99 a whack. I mean, my God. That's utterly ridiculous. I look at the $1.99 price now as a bit exorbitant, frankly, since you can get these shows in better quality, and for free, on TV. I mean, I have a Media Center PC. I can skip the commercials already. iTunes is not exactly a bargain, sorry, and I won't typically watch most TV shows, no matter how good, more than once. (Meanwhile, I listen to a lot of music repeatedly, and those files are just 99 cents each.)

As for tiered pricing, I think older TV shows should cost less than $1.99, and you should get a more substantial discount than is currently available when you purchase an entire season or subscribe to a current season. It's unclear to me why NBC needs to make a lot of money on something like "The A Team" right now. But you know what? I might grab season one out of nostalgia alone if the cost was more reasonable. Perhaps the answer to the tiered pricing question is that new content should always be priced at the current rate, but that older content could be priced lower to move it in higher quantities. (Perhaps content could become lower priced over time, based on when it was added to the store. You wait, you save.) There needs to be a compromise on tiered pricing, in other words, but not one that screws the consumer.

Both companies are being a bit self-serving here. Coming out in public as they both did in such dramatic fashion suggests that they're both willing to go to the brink. Not surprisingly, talks between NBC and Apple are ongoing. So they're using this as a PR and negotiating tool. Apple, as always, seeks to look like the champion of the little guy. I have to say, while I shudder at such a notion in general, in this case it seems believable. Here, it does appear that Apple represents the consumer's best interests. Thus, I am rooting for them to win.

Put simply, I like that TV shows are available via the iTunes Store, and I've certainly purchased a number of shows that I missed for whatever reason on TV. (It's mostly a backup plan, however. I would never personally subscribe to a new TV show season via iTunes,) This is just another way for networks, in this case, to make money from customers, and it's unclear why they don't see it that way. In this case, NBC is wrong and Apple is right. How any company could be as bald facedly anti-consumer as NBC appears to be right now is beyond me.

Labels: ,

[ Posted at 8:54 AM | Permalink ]

 

Friday, August 31, 2007

iTunes Store To Stop Selling NBC Television Shows

Apple fires back at NBC:
Apple today announced that it will not be selling NBC television shows for the upcoming television season on its online iTunes Store (www.itunes.com). The move follows NBC’s decision to not renew its agreement with iTunes after Apple declined to pay more than double the wholesale price for each NBC TV episode, which would have resulted in the retail price to consumers increasing to $4.99 per episode from the current $1.99. ABC, CBS, FOX and The CW, along with more than 50 cable networks, are signed up to sell TV shows from their upcoming season on iTunes at $1.99 per episode.

“We are disappointed to see NBC leave iTunes because we would not agree to their dramatic price increase,” said Eddy Cue, Apple’s vice president of iTunes. “We hope they will change their minds and offer their TV shows to the tens of millions of iTunes customers.”

Apple’s agreement with NBC ends in December. Since NBC would withdraw their shows in the middle of the television season, Apple has decided to not offer NBC TV shows for the upcoming television season beginning in September. NBC supplied iTunes with three of its 10 best selling TV shows last season, accounting for 30 percent of iTunes TV show sales.
Yikes. Apparently, Apple isn't taking this one lying down.

Labels: ,

[ Posted at 1:14 PM | Permalink ]

 

NBC ends contract with Apple's iTunes

Reuters:
NBC Universal has decided not to renew its contract to sell television shows on iTunes, becoming the second major media company to challenge Apple Inc's dominance in digital entertainment.

NBC Universal had demanded more control over pricing for digital downloads of its shows, which include "Battlestar Gallactica" and "Heroes," said a source familiar with the matter on Friday, confirming a New York Times report.

A spokeswoman for NBC Universal confirmed it will not renew the contract and declined to elaborate. NBC Universal is the No. 1 supplier of digital video to the online store, accounting for about 40 percent of downloads.
Yikes. Could this be a publicity stunt to get a better deal? Or are the iTunes downloads just not amounting to anything?

Labels: , ,

[ Posted at 11:54 AM | Permalink ]

 

Thursday, August 30, 2007

Sony to unplug Connect music service

Associated Press:
Acknowledging its proprietary audio technology was a marketplace flop, Sony Corp. is shuttering its Connect digital music store and will open its portable media players to other formats.

The moves were announced Thursday at a Berlin consumer electronics trade fair as the Japanese electronics pioneer unveiled a pair of new digital Walkmans that can play the Windows Media Audio, MP3 and AAC audio formats.

Sony said it would phase out operations of its struggling Connect online store, which sold songs in the company's proprietary ATRAC format.

"This gives customers greater flexibility in their music software approach," the company said in a statement. "As a result, Sony will be phasing out the Connect Music Services based on Sony's ATRAC audio format in North America and Europe."
And another one bites the dust, in this case not a moment too soon. It's bad enough that Sony went with a format--ATRAC--that no one supported, but its own devices were generally woefully bad. And it's interesting to see someone jumping on board PlaysForSure amid all the recent bad news about that platform.

Labels: , ,

[ Posted at 12:56 PM | Permalink ]

 

Tuesday, August 21, 2007

Wal-Mart to Sell Music Online Without Copyright Protections ... in MP3 Format

Wall Street Journal:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc. has begun selling some of its online music catalog without anticopying software, stepping up its competition with Apple Inc.'s iTunes store.

Wal-Mart will sell songs without the software -- known as digital rights management, or DRM -- through its walmart.com site for 94 cents a track, or $9.22 an album. The No. 1 seller of recorded music said it will launch the service with songs from two major record labels, Vivendi SA's Universal Music Group and EMI Group PLC.
I've applauded Apple's decision to offer 256 Kbps AAC tracks via iTunes, but this is of course preferable: MP3 offers much better compatibility, and Wal-Mart's files are also 256 Kbps, which is excellent quality. Finally.

Labels: ,

[ Posted at 10:08 AM | Permalink ]

 

Tuesday, August 14, 2007

Music: It's better than it sounds on MP3

San Francisco Chronicle:
The artificial audio of MP3s is quickly becoming the primary way people listen to music. Apple already has sold 100 million iPods, and more than a billion MP3 files are traded every month through the Internet.

But the music contained in these computer files represents less than 10 percent of the original music on the CDs. In its journey from CD to MP3 player, the music has been compressed by eliminating data that computer analysis deems redundant, squeezed down until it fits through the Internet pipeline.

When even the full files on the CDs contain less than half the information stored to studio hard drives during recording, these compressed MP3s represent a minuscule fraction of the actual recording. For purists, it's the dark ages of recorded sound.

How much the audio quality is affected by the MP3 process depends on the compression strategy, the encoder used, the playback equipment, computer speed and many other steps along the way. Experts agree, however, that the audio quality of most MP3s is somewhere around FM radio. The best digital audio, even with increased sampling rates and higher bit rates, still falls short of the natural quality of now-obsolete analog tape recording.

How good MP3s sound obviously also depends greatly on the playback system. But most MP3s are heard through cheap computer speakers, plastic iPod docking stations or, worse yet, those audio abominations called earbuds.
I'm always amused when people say that low-quality MP3/WMA/AAC tracks sound just fine. It literally is the audio equivalent of calling a McDonalds Happy Meal delicious. I guess it just depends on what you're used to consuming.

Related: Just because it's digital, doesn't mean it sounds good

Semi-related: I discovered this story through MacSurfer, which is a good (if curiously repetitive) Mac news aggregator site. They were linking to a story on The Inquirer, which is a sad little "The Register"-wannabe site from the UK that, as it turns out, simply reworded a story they had discovered on The Seattle PI. (My guess is they do that a lot.) However, even that story wasn't the original: The PI can apparently republish stories from The San Francisco Chronicle, but of course they don't link to the "original." So I went and looked for it and linked to that here. Sometimes I really wonder about the Internet.

Labels: , , ,

[ Posted at 12:36 PM | Permalink ]

 

Wednesday, August 01, 2007

iTunes Store Tops Three Billion Songs

I'm obviously behind a bit, having just arrived in France, but this is still big news of course:
Apple today announced that more than three billion songs have been purchased and downloaded from the iTunes Store. iTunes is the world’s most popular online music, TV and movie store featuring a catalog of over five million songs, 550 television shows and 500 movies. iTunes recently surpassed Amazon and Target to become the third largest music retailer in the US.
I'm not a big fan of Apple's lousy 128 Kbps Protected AAC songs, but they've made some decent moves more recently with medium-quality (640 x ...) video and decent-quality (256 Kbps) non-protected AAC, the latter of which isn't the format I prefer, but I can live with it. Given Apple's quality-driven nature, the company should try and move toward higher-quality (HD?) video across the board where possible, and 256 Kbps or better audio across the board, even for protected music.

Labels: ,

[ Posted at 4:41 AM | Permalink ]

 

Monday, July 23, 2007

CinemaNow updates Media Manager with Xbox 360 support, new Vista options

Ars Technica:
Movie website CinemaNow has released an update to its Media Manager software that enhances the software's capability in two significant ways. Xbox 360 owners who've networked the system to a PC with Media Manager installed can now download movies to the PC and watch them on their televisions by using the XBox 360 as a pass-through device. Also available in the update is new support for the CinemaNow Burn-to-DVD feature in Windows Vista.

The company's current plan seems to be to extend its playback abilities to as many various devices and systems as possible, with support for Portable Media Players (PMPs) from Archos and built-in support for HP's upcoming line of MediaSmart LCD televisions.
I first tested PC-based movie services like MovieLink and CinemaNow several years ago, and long before Apple had any aspirations in the movie business, let alone music. It's astonishing to me that they're still trudging along, but then they do continue to offer features you can't get from iTunes.

Labels: ,

[ Posted at 9:14 AM | Permalink ]

 

Monday, July 02, 2007

Countdown to iPhone 1.01

What's the over/under on the first iPhone patch? Or the next upgrade to iTunes?

Labels: , ,

[ Posted at 8:59 AM | Permalink ]

 

Sunday, July 01, 2007

iTunes 7.3

So Apple released iTunes 7.3 on Friday to correspond with the release of the iPhone. But it turns out that this release actually addresses one of the most maddening flaws in the Apple TV: Previously, you couldn't stream photos to the device if it was full with your other media. Here's the Apple description:
Wirelessly share digital photos from any computer in your home with Apple TV
Simple, no? But this is huge, and a big deal for anyone who's been frustrated by this problem.

Labels: , ,

[ Posted at 2:21 PM | Permalink ]

 

Tuesday, June 26, 2007

Apple makes two big iPhone announcements

With the clock ticking ever closer to the iPhone release date, Apple today made two major and long-awaited announcements:

AT&T and Apple Announce Simple, Affordable Service Plans for iPhone
iPhone goes on sale at 6:00 p.m. (local time) on Friday, June 29 and will be sold in the US through Apple’s retail and online stores and AT&T retail stores. All iPhone monthly service plans are ... based on a new two-year service agreement with AT&T. Individual plans are priced at $59.99 for 450 minutes, $79.99 for 900 minutes and $99.99 for 1,350 minutes. All plans include unlimited data (email and web), Visual Voicemail, 200 SMS text messages, roll over minutes and unlimited mobile-to-mobile and a one-time activation fee of $36.
Apple and AT&T Announce iTunes Activation and Sync for iPhone
Apple and AT&T today announced that iPhone users will be able to activate their new iPhones using Apple’s popular iTunes software running on a PC or Mac computer in the comfort and privacy of their own home or office, without having to wait in a store while their phone is activated. Activating iPhone takes only minutes as iTunes guides the user through simple steps to choose their service plan, authorize their credit and activate their iPhone. Once iPhone is activated, users can then easily sync all of their phone numbers and other contact information, calendars, email accounts, web browser bookmarks, music, photos, podcasts, TV shows and movies just like they do when they sync their iPods with iTunes.
That second one is truly innovative, if a bit obvious. But this really changes the landscape for purchasing a phone. I'm curious, though: Can you deactivate your iPhone through iTunes, too, just as you deactivate a computer from your iTunes Store account?

Related: iPhone activation and sync video (Apple)

Labels: , ,

[ Posted at 12:48 PM | Permalink ]

 

Monday, June 25, 2007

Apple Now Third-Largest US Music Retailer

Reuters:
Apple Inc.'s digital music store iTunes is now the third-largest music retailer in the United States with 10 percent market share, overtaking Amazon.com in the first quarter, according to a survey released Friday.

The NPD Group report highlights the growing strength of digital music in the U.S. market as physical sales of compact discs continue to slide.

Apple's iTunes is third behind market leader Wal-Mart Stores Inc. with a 15.8 percent share, and Best Buy Co Inc. with a 13.8 percent share, according to the survey of 40,000 people aged 13 and older.

Both of those retailers mostly sell music in the CD format.
This one was only a matter of time, but I'm curious that the number one and two players in this market have such low market share. It's actually possible for Apple to one day be the dominant supplier of music overall, which is astonishing.

Labels: , ,

[ Posted at 9:19 AM | Permalink ]

 

Monday, June 11, 2007

Apple to bring rentable movies to iTunes, finally

Next, we'll see a subscription music service. WSJ reports on a development I've been asking for now for a while: Movies for rent from iTunes. After all, how many movies are really good enough to watch more than once?
Apple Inc. is in talks with the Hollywood studios to make new movies available for rental for its iTunes service, according to two studio executives familiar with the matter.

The rental service is being pitched aggressively by Apple, with titles to rent for $2.99 for a set number of days before expiring, these people said. It is unclear which studios might participate, with Viacom Inc.'s Paramount Pictures currently in favor and General Electric Co.'s Universal Studios Inc. currently opposed, for example. The service is far from a certainty with several details to iron out, said a person close to the situation.

For Apple, such a deal would represent a departure from a long-term strategy. Mr. Jobs has many times dismissed the consumer appeal of rental-like "subscription" music services, which allow users to listen to as much music as they like for a flat monthly fee, without giving them permanent ownership of the songs. He has been less vocal about the appeal of movie rentals on the Web. Unlike music, movies rented on physical media like DVDs are a well-established category

Labels: , ,

[ Posted at 8:42 AM | Permalink ]

 

Wednesday, May 30, 2007

Steve Jobs at D: All Things Digital

Engadget has nice coverage of Steve Jobs' appearance today at D. A couple of observations:

- Jobs describes the new Apple as being three businesses and a "hobby." The businesses are Mac, music, and phone. The hobby, curiously, is Apple TV. This is sort of disingenuous. If the Apple TV fails, Apple can claim it was never a serious effort anyway.

- Jobs got into Mac market share and was reasonably accurate, though he of course rounded up on everything. According to Jobs, the Mac has 3 percent market share worldwide (it's really 2.49 percent), 5-6 percent market share in the US (lower than I would have guessed), 12 percent market share in US notebooks, and "double digit" market share in the US consumer market share, with the caveat that "we can't really calculate the consumer market share." So that last one, presumably, is just a guess.

- Jobs promised big things for the Mac at WWDC 2007, which is in early June. I've spoken to Apple about this show and will soon have an article about the company's interesting push to deal with the Windows developers who are now showing up at the event.

- No new iPods any time soon, despite some stammering from Jobs that "last September" (when the last iPods were released) wasn't all that long ago.

- Jobs again disingenuously claimed that there's no iPod lock-in because "if you look at the total number of iPods and total number of songs sold on iTunes, it's less than 25 per iPod." So consumers are "clearly not getting the majority of their songs from iTunes." That's not what lock-in means, however. Because iTunes is responsible for about 95 percent of all digitally sold music, and that music can only play on Apple's products, there's lock-in. Remember, Microsoft wasn't charged with a monopoly on operating systems. It was charged with a monopoly on operating systems for Intel-based PCs. Apple clearly has a monopoly on digitally sold music. Just as clear, however, is the fact that no law enforcement entity has any interest at all in calling them on that.

- There was much iPhone talk, naturally. I don't care much about the iPhone, however.

- YouTube on Apple TV. Yawn. Yet another extremely low-quality source of video that will look horrible on that HDTV you're using with the Apple TV.

- Jobs proudly noted that there are 300 million "or more" installs of iTunes worldwide, but was then forced to admit something I've been trying to communicate for some time now: "Statistically," as Jobs put it, almost all of those are on Windows. I do give Mossberg some credit for calling Jobs on that quip. "Statistically?" Mossberg retorted. "In reality? In this dimension?" That's a nice way to tear down a meaningless response. On the flip side, I also give Jobs credit for his final comeback: "It's like giving a glass of ice water to somebody in hell." Good one.

- When confronted with Apple's use of non-standard AAC instead of MP3, Jobs let loose with a whopper: "We don't own [AAC]. Anyone can license it, the majority of players out there can play it, and most of the big players out there play AAC." Those last two points are absolutely untrue.

Labels: , , ,

[ Posted at 5:03 PM | Permalink ]

 

Monday, May 14, 2007

iTunes 7 DRM cracked?

Or maybe it isn't. Jason O'Grady reports that it's happened:
Hymn, short for Hear Your Music aNywhere has a link to an updated version of QTFairUse6 (version 2.5) that can remove the DRM from music purchased from the iTunes Store.

QTFairUse6, created by IgorSK, is the only working solution for decrypting iTunes music. The software is useful for people that have purchased DRM'd music from the iTunes Store that want to play it on another brand of music player.
This certainly doesn't work with iTunes content I've purchased. And of course, it's still music only: To date, there's been no crack for iTunes-purchased videos, TV shows, and movies.

Labels: ,

[ Posted at 6:55 PM | Permalink ]

 

Monday, May 07, 2007

Yahoo untangles licensing web for lyrics service

Reuters:
A new music lyrics service launched by Yahoo illustrates the potential and the challenges of integrating lyrics into digital music products today.

At Yahoo and elsewhere, lyrics remain a notable omission from digital music files either purchased or acquired through subscription models. Not only do consumers not receive song lyrics with their download, they can't search for songs by lyrics within Yahoo Music Unlimited or any other digital music service including iTunes.
Two things.

1. Yahoo! Music is still in business?

b. Getting lyrics with digital music would be nice, but isn't necessary. As the father of a deaf son, I'd have to say that there are far bigger issues with these services right now. For starters, how is it even legal in the US to distribute digital TV shows and movies with out closed captioning? Apple--and anyone else that does this--should be ashamed of themselves for ignoring this. Song lyrics? Pfft. Please. Let's get our priorities straight.

Labels: , ,

[ Posted at 8:36 AM | Permalink ]

 

Friday, April 27, 2007

Looking back on the Rolling Stone interview with Steve Jobs

Rolling Stone is a surprisingly good magazine, which I know because I've been mysteriously receiving it this year despite having never ordered or paid for it. (I assume it was a gift.) Anyway, three years ago they interviewed Steve Jobs. Here are some key excerpts, which are interesting today given how things turned out.

Regarding DRM:
When we first went to talk to these record companies ... we said: None of this technology that you're talking about's gonna work. We have Ph.D.'s here, that know the stuff cold, and we don't believe it's possible to protect digital content.
Apple went on to make a fairly unspectacular DRM called FairPlay. However, despite its technical inferiority to Windows Media DRM, FairPlay has clearly won out in the market, thanks to the success of the iTunes Store and the iPod. Game, set, match.

Regarding subscription music services:
These [music subscription] services that are out there now are going to fail.Here's why: People don't want to buy their music as a subscription. They bought 45's; then they bought LP's; then they bought cassettes; then they bought 8-tracks; then they bought CD's. They're going to want to buy downloads. People want to own their music. You don't want to rent your music -- and then, one day, if you stop paying, all your music goes away.

And, you know, at 10 bucks a month, that's $120 a year. That's $1,200 a decade. That's a lot of money for me to listen to the songs I love. It's cheaper to buy, and that's what they're gonna want to do.
I still feel that subscription music services are a great idea, because people's musical tastes change over time, and if you're active buying music, there's no better way to find new music. Indeed, if Apple ever did add a subscription option to iTunes, it'd be a huge success, no doubt about it. Part of the problem with today's services is that they're too expensive. $15 a month is just way too much.

Regarding digital music sales and success:
There are approximately 800 million CD's sold in the U.S. a year, I believe. That's about 10 billion tracks, right? About 10 billion tracks in the U.S. -- sold legally. Our next milestones are to get up to 100 million tracks a year, then a quarter a billion, and then half a billion, and then a billion. And that's gonna take a little bit of time.
Certainly, Apple is on the way. What hasn't happened is that digital music has yet to make up for the drop in traditional CD sales.

Regarding digital movie sales:
Movies are very different than music. First of all, they're a hundred times larger. There's only been one way to buy your music -- that's on a CD. Look at the ways there are to legally buy a movie -- you can see it at the theater, you can buy it on home video, you can buy on DVD. But you can also rent it at Blockbuster or Netflix. You can watch it on pay-per-view. You can also watch it on cable or network TV. There are a lot of ways to legally get a movie. There was only one way to legally get music. That's a really big difference. The distribution is much more highly evolved in the movie industry than it ever was in the music industry

People who just make the leap that movies are next are wrong.
And yet, Apple jumped right into movie (and TV) sales, right after music. Though Apple is no doubt now the most popular online service for movies, it's had a slow start. The problem is, unlike music, most people don't want to watch most movies more than once. $10 to $15 for a standard definition digital movie is too much money.

Regarding what happens when Microsoft copies the iPod:
There are a lot of examples of people offering services, Internet-based services, that have done quite well [against Microsoft].

One of the reasons Apple was able to do what we did was because we are perceived by the music industry as the most creative technology company. And now we've created this music store, which I think is nontrivial to copy. I mean, to say that Microsoft can just decide to copy it, and copy it in six months -- that's a big statement. It may not be so easy.
And sure enough, Microsoft did copy iTunes, first with MSN Music, then with URGE, and then completely with Zune Marketplace. It took quite a bit of time, and Microsoft has certainly not made much of a dent in the iTunes armor so far. I guess I don't expect them to.

Thanks Eddis.

Labels: , ,

[ Posted at 12:41 PM | Permalink ]

 

Monday, April 09, 2007

Microsoft Confirms Move to DRM-Free Music

Me, in WinInfo:
Lost amid the hoopla over last week's EMI announcement regarding their decision to sell digital music without digital rights management (DRM) restrictions was the fact that Apple was only the first digital music reseller to sign on for the new offerings. This week, Microsoft admitted that it, too, would offer music without DRM.

"The EMI announcement is not exclusive to Apple," a Microsoft spokesperson says. "Consumers have made it clear that unprotected music is something they want. We plan on offering it to them as soon as our label partners are comfortable with it." Microsoft says it has been working with EMI and other record labels for quite some time, and will offer DRM-free music via the Zune Marketplace, its online service for the Zune portable device, as soon as possible.
I was sort of amazed at how many articles about last week's EMI announcement pushed it as an Apple event. Apple was the first to sign on because they're the biggest service by far. But many others will be offering DRM-less music. I'm hoping to see at least one of them use MP3.

Labels: , ,

[ Posted at 9:51 AM | Permalink ]

 

100 Million iPods Sold: Let's Look to the Next 100 Million

Apple celebrates an amazing milestone:
Apple today announced that the 100 millionth iPod has been sold, making the iPod the fastest selling music player in history. The first iPod was sold five and a half years ago, in November 2001, and since then Apple has introduced more than 10 new iPod models, including five generations of iPod, two generations of iPod mini, two generations of iPod nano and two generations of iPod shuffle. Along with iTunes and the iTunes online music store, the iPod has transformed how tens of millions of music lovers acquire, manage and listen to their music.

The iPod has also sparked an unprecedented ecosystem of over 4,000 accessories made specifically for the iPod that range from fashionable cases to speaker systems, and more than 70 percent of 2007-model US automobiles currently offer iPod connectivity.

Every iPod features seamless integration with iTunes 7. The iTunes Store features the world’s largest catalog with over five million songs, 350 television shows and over 400 movies. The iTunes Store has sold over 2.5 billion songs, 50 million TV shows and over 1.3 million movies, making it the world’s most popular online music, TV and movie store.
The market penetration of the iPod, combined with its support ecosystem of hardware add-ons, is a tech success story unlike few others. Only Windows, arguably, or the Sony PS2 during its several-years-long moment in the sun, saw such success. Absolutely astonishing.

Now, it's time to look ahead. Like many, I'm eager to see an iPhone-like video iPod, preferrably with a user-removable battery. I'd like to see more and better movie content on the iTunes Store, with lower-cost options to rent (and not own) content I'll only want to watch once. I want to see Closed Captioning and subtitle support on all TV and movie content, so my son and other hearing-impaired users can finally utilize this incredible service. I'd like an Apple TV that will let me browse and buy iTunes content from the couch, and utilize DVR functionality so I can watch live and recorded TV.

Put simply, there's still a lot of work to do. I'm excited for the future.

Labels: , , ,

[ Posted at 9:27 AM | Permalink ]

 

Thursday, April 05, 2007

About audio codecs (Updated)

In the wake of Apple's decision to provide DRM-free versions of AAC song files via iTunes, there's been a lot of renewed interest in audio codecs, their costs, and how they're licensed. Not surprisingly, my go-to guy for this kind of information, Dave Caulton, has been documenting this stuff on his Zunester blog. I'd like to summarize that information, and some other related details, here.

First, the codecs. With due respect to the Ogg crowd, there are really only three codecs that matter today: MP3 (or as I call it, The One True Format), WMA (Windows Media Audio), and AAC (Advanced Audio Codec). Microsoft, of course, created and licenses WMA. Apple utilizes (but did not create) AAC.

Contrary to popular belief, MP3 is not free, but because it is so pervasive (or as Dave notes, what we might call the JPEG of audio formats), all audio devices and software can work with this format. WMA is supported by far more device and software types than AAC, due to its very low licensing costs (see below), but AAC is arguably more pervasive now from a numbers standpoint, due to the success of the iPod and iTunes, both of which are AAC-compatible.

Regarding licensing costs, WMA is the least expensive of the three, though that's become increasingly irrelevant. The licensing fee for WMA is just 10 cents per unit, but there is a maximum cost of just $400,000. Thrifty.

MP3 is in the middle, from a cost perspective. The MP3 licensing cost for portable devices is 75 cents per device.

AAC is the most expensive, at least for low-volume licensees, which explains why you see so few AAC-compatible devices. The cost structure is tiered as followed: For devices that sell less than 400,000 units per year, the cost is $1.00 per unit. At 400,001 to 2 million units, the cost is 74 cents per unit. Over 2 million units, the cost is less expensive. (Anyone have a number?)

Update: A reader ("yawn" by name) provided this link to Via's AAC licensing fees. Not surprisingly, it's tiered and confusing. (As opposed to tired and confusing, I guess.)

Licensing cost comparison:

250,000 units
WMA: $25,000
MP3: $187,500
AAC: $250,000

500,000 units
WMA: $50,000
MP3: $375,000
AAC: $370,000

1,000,000 units
WMA: $100,000
MP3: $750,000
AAC: $740,000

But wait, there's more: Dave also notes that MP3 actually comes with a content distribution fee as well, which is sort of amazing (in a bad way):
The Thompson site says you pay 2% of revenues from a service - or $0.02/song - to use mp3 in a service. The last time I saw a content distribution fee, it was on mpeg-4 part 2, and it pretty much killed that standard. Thankfully, in h.264 mpeg dropped that requirement for free distribution.
From a quality perspective, both AAC and WMA offer dramatic compression benefits over MP3. However, because of MP3's pervasiveness and the low cost of storage, this has never really translated into much of an issue for users. AAC and WMA offer roughly equivalent quality at the same bit-rates.

Windows Media DRM is the most widely licensed DRM scheme, from a number of licensees perspective. Apple does not license its FairPlay DRM scheme, but since the iPod and iTunes are so popular, it is arguably the most widely-used DRM scheme today (from a digital file format perspective). Comparing DRM licensing fees is thus pointless, as you couldn't license FairPlay if you wanted to. (There's been one exception, of course: Motorola's RAZR iTunes-compatible phones.)

Finally, Apple's decision to offer 256 Kbps AAC files via iTunes does not mean that all DRM-free songs sold in the coming years and months will be in AAC format. Other services will be able to offer these songs in other formats, including DRM-free MP3 and WMA, and no doubt will. So while I applaud Apple for offering DRM-free songs, I will likely look elsewhere for this music, not because of quality issues (256 Kbps AAC is excellent) but because of compatibility issues: As a Media Center user, especially, and someone who wants to keep my options open going forward, I will always seek out MP3 when possible. When it's not possible, I purchase from high-quality services, burn to CD, and re-rip back to the PC in MP3 format. I will now be able to do this with Apple's 256 Kbps AAC songs. It's not possible with the current 128 Kbps files, because of the resulting unacceptable loss in quality that occurs during the conversion process.

Update: A number of readers point out that iTunes can actually convert AAC files to MP3 (and vice versa). What it does is use the format you set up in the application's Import format settings. This is obviously better than burning and re-ripping, so if this works with Apple's DRM-less AAC files, well, bravo: I'll be all over that.

So I'm expecting some pushback. Invariably, people get agitated by the fine points of any discussion like this. I'm interested in keeping this accurate, but I'm not interested in your religious beliefs (aka "but AAC is a million times more efficient than WMA"). If you have a valuable and accurate correction to make, I'm listening.

Labels: , , , ,

[ Posted at 10:20 AM | Permalink ]

 

Wednesday, April 04, 2007

Recording Industry is the Culprit, EU Says

Me, in WinInfo:
A day after revealing that it had sent a statement of objections to Apple and the four largest record companies, European Union (EU) antitrust regulators said that the recording industry was the real target of its charges. The EU has alleged that the recording industry and Apple are engaged in unfair pricing of songs sold via Apple's iTunes Store.

"This is an arrangement imposed on Apple by the record companies," an EU spokesperson said Tuesday, agreeing with comments made by Apple spokespeople a day earlier. "The main focus of our attention is the major record companies."
I have to admit, when Apple immediately fingered the recording industry yesterday, I found that a tad off, given that they're partners and so forth. But clearly the EU agrees. My guess is we're going to see standardized pricing across the EU shortly.

Labels: , ,

[ Posted at 9:53 AM | Permalink ]

 

Tuesday, April 03, 2007

EU Reveals Apple Antitrust Investigation

Me, in WinInfo:
Today, the European Union (EU) announced it was investigating Apple for antitrust violations related to the pricing of music sold via its iTunes Store service. The European Commission (EC) has sent a statement of objections to Apple, spelling out how the company and the four major recording companies who supply it with music are violating EU antitrust laws.

At issue is the way Apple charges different prices in iTunes Store for the same content in different countries. This, the EU says, unfairly penalizes those consumers in countries where the content is more expensive.
My take on this is simple: This is no big deal. If the EU were to investigate Apple's tying of the iPod and iTunes and its effect on the company both acquiring and maintaining a monopoly in the digital music space--which, frankly, you could make a case for--then we'd have a Microsoft-style legal mess on our hands. But this does seem to be the record companies' problem, not Apple's.

Labels: , , ,

[ Posted at 10:40 AM | Permalink ]

 

Monday, April 02, 2007

More than you ever wanted to know about audio formats

Thanks to David Caulton for reminding the world that, no, AAC is not an open standard:
Thought I'd lay out some fundamental facts about a few audio formats - some comments show some common misperceptions.

* Mp3 – the jpeg of digital music. Supported by everyone, everywhere. Mediocre compression efficiency, but utterly dominant in personal libraries because users can simply rip to a higher bitrate. Licensable by anyone for a low fee. Universal compatibility is mp3’s key feature.

* AAC – designed for MPEG, by MPEG. Largely associated with Apple at this point, AAC was designed by a licensing body, complete with patent pool, etc.. Licensable by anyone for a (relatively pricey) fee from MPEG-LA. High compression efficiency. Compatibility is fine – as long as you buy Apple products.

* WMA – Microsoft’s audio format. Adopted by most mp3 player skus (but not by most mp3 player units, thanks to the iPod..). Freely licensable for a low fee. Also associated with WMDRM, which is supported by playsforsure devices. High compression efficiency, good compatibility story, but not as good as mp3’s.

* Ogg, FLAC, etc… - Open source codecs. Generally good compression efficiency, but very low support from services and devices. To use these is to enter untested legal waters, but they’re very interesting, and nobody is asking for money for them...yet.
I'd add that the DRM-protected versions of AAC (Apple) and WMA (everyone else) are essentially separate formats from a compatibility standpoint. That is, just because a device or piece of software supports AAC doesn't mean that it also supports Fairplay-enhanced protected AAC (from iTunes).

Labels: , , , , ,

[ Posted at 6:17 PM | Permalink ]

 

EMI Drops DRM, iTunes First to Sign On

Me, in WinInfo:
Music giant EMI this morning announced that it would be releasing its entire catalog without digital rights management (DRM) restrictions, the first of the four largest music companies to do so. In addition, EMI announced that Apple's iTunes would be the first online music service to sell these unrestricted files starting in May.

Apple CEO Steve Jobs said Monday that the DRM-free versions of individual songs will offer twice the quality of the DRM-restricted versions, meaning that they will be encoded using the 256 Kbps AAC audio format, compared to 128 Kbps for the original versions. (In a bit of showmanship, Jobs claimed that the 128 Kbps files already offered "the best audio quality" offered by any mainstream digital music service, which is demonstrably untrue: All Windows Media-based online services already offer dramatically higher quality music files than does Apple.) The new songs will cost $1.29 in the US, compared to 99 cents for the restricted versions.

In a nice nod toward users, Apple will also allow its customers to upgrade any existing EMI song purchases to the new unrestricted format for 30 cents per song.
Related: Apple Unveils Higher Quality DRM-Free Music on the iTunes Store

Labels: , , ,

[ Posted at 8:48 AM | Permalink ]

 

EMI Uveils Plan to Sell Music Without Anticopying Software

WSJ:
In a major break with the music industry's longstanding antipiracy strategy, EMI Group PLC announced today that it plans to sell significant amounts of its catalog without anticopying software.

The London music company made its announcement with Apple Inc. Chief Executive Steve Jobs. EMI is to sell songs without the software -- known as digital rights management -- through Apple's iTunes Store and possibly through other online outlets.

EMI's move comes after months of private discussions and public advocacy by Internet and technology-industry executives, including Mr. Jobs, aimed at encouraging the music industry to change its approach to licensing music for sale online. In February, Mr. Jobs took the unusual step of posting an 1,800-word essay on Apple's Web site urging major recording companies to consider dropping their insistence that music be sold over the Internet with DRM software.
Ah well. No Beatles, not today.

However: EMI is going for premium downloads. They will be free from DRM and will offer vastly improved sound quality, something I've been asking for for years. They will come at a premium, which I think I'm OK with, though I'd note that all WMA-based digital stores already offer better quality than iTunes. Some even offer lossless music.

Labels: , ,

[ Posted at 8:23 AM | Permalink ]

 

Thursday, March 29, 2007

Apple TV hacks hackers

If this is true, Apple has just caused my rethinking of Apple TV to be quite temporary:
We thought it was too good to be true. Mysterious goings-on have put an end to happy hackers' tinkering with Apple TV.

Just days after intrepid telly addicts ripped open Apple TV's innards to install larger drives and extra file support, the guys at Tutorial Ninjas a reporting they've had their boxes remotely reset to remove any additional features they've shoehorned in.

According to their website, the Ninja's awoke to find their freshly hacked TV boxes had several features disabled overnight ... Apple TV is repairing itself overnight using a scheduled reset tool, known as a 'chronjob.'
Sigh.

Well, that's a shame. After writing my Apple TV review and being, frankly, unimpressed by the device, the quick rise in Apple TV hacks had me believing, briefly, that Apple actually had a master plan with the Apple TV: Slip a tiny OS X-based box into the world's living rooms and let the hackers go nuts. Overnight, this device would become so much more useful because an amazing ecosystem would arise around it.

Too bad it's not true. As it stands, Apple TV is what I said it was originally: An overpriced way to to get iTunes video content into your den. And it's unclear that there's a huge market for that, especially when you consider the lack of content on Apple's service. My guess is that this is all about making the Apple TV appear "safe" to content makers.

Related: Apple vs Apple TV Mod’rs

Labels: , , ,

[ Posted at 11:19 AM | Permalink ]

 

Apple Offers Album Discounts

Me, in WinInfo:
After arguing for years that the success of its iTunes Store rests on low, standardized pricing, Apple on Wednesday unveiled a new feature of the online service, called Complete My Album, that was directly requested by the music industry. Users who purchase individual songs on iTunes can now buy the rest of the album via the service for a discounted price.

Previously, iTunes customers who purchased individual tracks from an album were not credited for those purchases if they later went back and purchased the entire album, meaning they were effectively charged for certain songs twice. Now, customers will receive a 99 cent credit for each song they purchased from an album when they later go back and purchase the full album.
Related: The Album, a Commodity in Disfavor (NYT):
The industry is straining to shore up the album as long as possible, in part by prodding listeners who buy one song to purchase the rest of a collection. Apple, in consultation with several labels, has been planning to offer iTunes users credit for songs they have already purchased if they then choose to buy the associated album in a certain period of time, according to people involved in the negotiations. (Under Apple’s current practice, customers who buy a song and then the related album effectively pay for the song twice).

Labels: , , ,

[ Posted at 10:38 AM | Permalink ]

 

Tuesday, March 27, 2007

Apple TV Hard Drive Upgrade Tutorial

Apple TV Hacks:
Here it is, a step by step tutorial on upgrading your Apple TV harddrive.

You can do this via the terminal, or by using some applications (which add $100 to the cost of the process).

What you need:

Hex-bit screwdriver
2.5? hard drive (we used a Western Digital 120 GB WD1200VE drive)
Wiebetech Forensic DriveDock (optional, but recommended) or any 2.5? to Firewire bridge
Subrosasoft’s CopyCatX ($49), or be comfy with the terminal
Coriolis’s iPartition ($45), or use the Apple Factory Restore

[and an Intel-based Mac].
This and the numerous other Apple TV hacks that are appearing are clearly a huge differentiator for the device, though they don't make up for its shortcomings, at least not yet. Apple had to know this would be part of the appeal of the Apple TV. Good stuff.

"Hard drive" is not one word, by the way. :)

Labels: , , ,

[ Posted at 10:45 AM | Permalink ]

 

Sunday, March 25, 2007

Paul Thurrott's Apple TV review... (Part 2)

I guess I should respond to the other mistakes in John Malloy's scathing attack on my Apple TV review too. It won't be hard:
Now Paul, you are just being naughty - the retail price of the XBOX is 100 bucks more for the version without the hard drive ($399) and a good 200 bucks more for the version with the 20 gig drive ($499).
Actually, the Xbox 360 is $299, the same price as the Apple TV. This hard drive-less version works just fine as a Media Center Extender, as I wrote. I know this because I've got one in my den right now, and it's my family's sole interface to TV content. You can spend $399 (not $499) on the premium version of the console (with hard drive) if you want, but it's not necessary for media sharing or Media Center Extender use.
Also as a media centre the XBOX is an enormous PC with big BOY connections and is as loud as can be imagined.
The Xbox is absolutely louder than the Apple TV, but I mentioned that. However, when using the Media Center Extender feature, it's much quieter than when you're playing games. And unlike the Apple TV, it can perform a variety of useful functions like playing DVD movies, playing HD-DVD movies with an optional $200 add-on, accessing online movie services like MovieLink without having to get up and go back to the PC or Mac in your home office, access its own online TV show and movie service (again, without having to leave the couch), and so on. Of course, I mention that all in my review. Yeah, it's louder.

And that's about it. To summarize:

- John says that you can't expect Paul Thurrott of SuperSite for Windows fame to write fair reviews of Apple products, despite much evidence to the contrary.

- The base Xbox 360 is the same price as the Apple TV but provides much, much more value, despite John's assertions and price mistakes designed to make Apple's product look cheaper.

- John's right: The Xbox 360 is louder than the Apple TV. I'd add that the Apple TV runs quite hot (I also mentioned this in my review), and is, in fact, too hot to touch after being in use for a while. This is a concern but, I felt, with no proof there was no reason to believe it will result in unreliability issues. Time will tell.

- For whatever it's worth, the Xbox comes with cables to connect to a TV, unlike Apple TV, which comes with no cables. The connections you make, however, will ultimately be the same or similar for each device.

Wow, I really am unreasonable.

Labels: , , ,

[ Posted at 11:55 AM | Permalink ]

 

Saturday, March 24, 2007

Apple TV Review

Me, in SuperSite for Windows:
Apple TV is another way to enjoy the content you manage by iTunes, and a natural evolution of the work Apple has done with the iPod. It's not the first to utilize a TV--you can easily connect most modern iPods to your TV with an optional dock and set of cables (and, incidentally, duplicate almost everything the Apple TV does at a lower cost)--but it is the first Apple device designed specifically and exclusively for the living room. And while it is missing some very key functionality that would make this device far more compelling, it's not a horrible first attempt.

I'm a huge fan and regular user of iTunes and various iPods, but the Apple TV is lacking that special something that those solutions have in spades. It is neither best of breed nor even in the running. It is, in short, simply OK. And I know Apple can do better than this.

And if you are thinking about an Apple TV, consider this: You can do virtually everything the Apple TV does with the iPod you probably already own, a $39 dock, and a $19 set of cables, albeit at standard definition resolutions. Is the Apple TV really worth the $300? At this point, the answer, for most people, is no.
I wanted to love the Apple TV but it's just too limited. The big problem, of course, is that it can't replace anything in your living room. Instead, you just add it to the already crowded home theater setup and it becomes yet another device to manage and spend money on. Sorry, but that's not that exciting.

Labels: , ,

[ Posted at 5:15 PM | Permalink ]

 

Thursday, March 22, 2007

Setting up and using Apple TV

And, finally, some pictures of the Apple TV user interface, during both setup and in general use...

Labels: , ,

[ Posted at 12:05 PM | Permalink ]

 

Accessing Apple TV from iTunes

Here are some pictures of iTunes interacting with an AppleTV:

Labels: , ,

[ Posted at 11:33 AM | Permalink ]

 

Apple TV arrives

Yikes, is this thing small. Some pictures...

Labels: , , ,

[ Posted at 9:41 AM | Permalink ]

 

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

A month late, Apple TV finally ships from China

My Apple TV has shipped:
Hello Paul Thurrott,

We wanted to let you know that your order has shipped. If you ordered multiple items, you may receive separate shipments with no additional shipping charges. All shipments except those delivered by the U.S. Postal Service require a signature on receipt. Visit Order Status to track or pre-sign for your shipment. If you'd like to request a return, print an invoice or view your account history, please log in to Your Account.

Best regards,
The Apple Store Team

Labels: , ,

[ Posted at 10:11 AM | Permalink ]

 

Sunday, March 18, 2007

QuickTime gains 720P Apple TV high-definition export mode

iLounge:
In an undisclosed and largely unnoticed update to its QuickTime video playback and conversion software, Apple has quietly added an “Export to Apple TV” feature capable of creating high-definition videos viewable on the Apple TV accessory. Unlike Export to iPod, which currently creates sub-DVD-quality 640 by 480 videos, Export to Apple TV creates not only full DVD-quality 720 by 404 videos, but also 1280 by 720 videos. These videos are viewable in iTunes, but cannot be transferred directly via iTunes to an fifth-generation iPod.

The 1280 by 720 pixel resolution, also known as 720P, is one of several high-definition video formats supported by current televisions. Using the H.264 video compression codec, Apple TV supports 720P playback at 24 frames per second - the frame rate used by movies, not TV shows - at substantially higher bit rates than prior iPod- and iTunes-created videos. A 2.5-minute 720P sample we converted with QuickTime yielded a 4214kbps, 76-Megabyte file from a 5708kbps, 102-Megabyte original, suggesting that feature-length, 90-minute HD movies formatted for Apple TV will require around 3 Gigabytes of hard disk space.
Sweet!

Labels: , ,

[ Posted at 8:43 PM | Permalink ]

 

iTunes and Windows Vista

Apple updates its Vista advisory for iTunes 7.1.1:
Apple has released a new version of iTunes that addresses a number of compatibility issues with Windows Vista. iTunes 7.1.1 is recommended for use with most editions of Windows Vista, however, Apple is actively working with Microsoft to resolve a few remaining known issues. This document will be updated as more information becomes available.
From what I can tell, iTunes 7.1.1. didn't actually fix any of the Vista compatibility issues that were remaining when iTunes 7.1 shipped. As Apple noted, iTunes 7.1.1. fixes "a stability issue and minor compatibility problems" only.

Labels: ,

[ Posted at 1:36 PM | Permalink ]

 

Friday, March 16, 2007

iTunes 7.1.1 for Mac and Windows

Apple:
iTunes 7.1.1 addresses a stability issue and minor compatibility problems in iTunes 7.1.
It doesn't get any briefer than that.

Download for Mac (28 MB)

Download for Windows (36.1 MB)

Labels:

[ Posted at 2:29 PM | Permalink ]

 

Wednesday, March 14, 2007

EU consumer chief sounds a softer iTunes note

Reuters:
The European Union's consumer chief has downplayed her views on Apple, backing off the line that its iTunes online music store must become more compatible with other formats.

Meglena Kuneva said during a news conference Tuesday that there is no reason to talk about legal action against the U.S. computer and technology company and that she merely wanted to raise questions.

"I would like, really, to start this debate. What is best to develop this market and to have more consumers enjoying this really very important, very modern way of downloading and enjoying the music?" she said of Apple's iTunes software.

"Somebody drew the comparison with Microsoft," which received a big antitrust blow from the EU a few years ago, Kuneva said. "No, this is not the case because the share of the market of Apple is really not a big one."
That last bit is interesting. I'm pretty sure that the overall importance of a nascent market like digital music outweighs raw observations like the size of the current market, but it's curious that that's even a qualification. It's OK to own a monopoly as long as the market you're dominating isn't big?

Labels: , ,

[ Posted at 8:07 PM | Permalink ]

 

Monday, March 12, 2007

The Ides of March are upon us ... Will Apple TV ever ship?

When Apple announced very late last month that Apple TV would be delayed from "February" to "mid-March," I had this sneaking suspicion that even that vague date was unrealistic. As you may recall, I had ordered an Apple TV the minute Apple's online store came online after the Jobs MacWorld keynote in January, and my order's ship date was changed to March 20 on February 27 (with a "delivers by" date of March 23, which isn't exactly "mid-March," but whatever). So once again, I'm wondering if it's really going to happen. Surely, Apple would have delayed the order by now if they knew March 20 wasn't doable. Surely.

Labels: ,

[ Posted at 9:48 AM | Permalink ]

 

Sunday, March 11, 2007

European consumer chief takes aim at iTunes

Reuters:
European Union consumer chief Meglena Kuneva has hit out at Apple Inc.'s bundling of its popular iPod music players and its iTunes online music store, according to German weekly magazine Focus.

"Do you think it's fine that a CD plays in all CD players but that an iTunes song only plays in an iPod? I don't. Something has to change," EU Consumer Protection Commissioner Kuneva was quoted as saying in a preview of an interview to be published on Monday.

Norway, a European country that is not in the EU, is battling Apple for the same reason. In January, it said the computer and software giant must liberalise its music download system by Oct. 1 or face legal action.

Pressure on Apple has been building, with consumer rights organisations from Germany, France, Finland and Norway recently agreeing a joint position in their battles against iTunes.

They argue that Apple uses digital rights technology to limit consumers' free use of songs bought on iTunes, including the ability to copy and transfer songs to other users and other MP3 devices besides the Apple iPod.
Whether you care to look at this from a competitive or consumer advocacy standpoint--either is valid, I'd say--this is an issue that's coming to a head. Apple is reaching that ugly monopoly point, where the rules change. Just ask Microsoft. Of course, there's also an argument to be made that Microsoft is now a shadow of its former self, afraid of competing aggressively. Like most things in life, there's no black and white. But I agree, things have to change.

Labels: , ,

[ Posted at 1:57 PM | Permalink ]

 

Friday, March 09, 2007

Music's New Gatekeeper

I subscribe to the online version of the Wall Street Journal, but I actually received the print version today in error (no doubt a substitution carrier) and noticed a fantastic article looking behind the scenes at Apple's iTunes operation. Looking at the Web version of the site, I would have absolutely missed this otherwise. It's a great read:
Every day, the roughly one million people who visit the iTunes Store home page are presented with several dozen albums, TV shows and movie downloads to consider buying -- out of the four million such goods the Apple site offers. This prime promotion is analogous to a CD being displayed at the checkout stands of all 940 Best Buy stores or featured on the front page of Target's ad circular.

How do bands get these boosts? Who decides whether Arcade Fire is plugged at the top of the iTunes site -- or whether Nickelback gets no mention?

Apple has jettisoned some of the conventions of traditional music retailing -- notably, the practice of selling prime promotional spots to recording companies willing to pay for better visibility for their acts. But behind the scenes there's plenty of horse-trading going on that influences which songs are seen and purchased by iTunes customers.
Related: Print version of the above article

Labels: , ,

[ Posted at 9:20 AM | Permalink ]

 

Tuesday, March 06, 2007

iTunes 7.1 for Windows Vista: The Good, the Bad, the Ugly

Sigh.

I was so excited that Apple was finally addressing Vista incompatibility issues in iTunes. So I downloaded iTunes 7.1, hoping for the best. Here's what I found:

Good
The Coverflow feature in iTunes 7.1 sports a full-screen mode now, which is really nice looking.



iTunes 7.1 also supports the Apple TV, though it will be a few weeks, at least, before we can test that.



Bad
Though iTunes appears to sport Vista-style Minimize, Maximize/Restore, and Close window buttons, they're just fakes. They don't "light up" like real Vista buttons, no doubt because Apple is doing its own custom application rendering. Ah well.



Ugly
After running iTunes 7.1 for the first time, you have to wait a long time while it updates your library. Then, when it completes, you'll discover that it deleted a bunch of your album art! WTF.

Ah well. At least there's some progress here.

Labels: ,

[ Posted at 11:13 AM | Permalink ]

 

iTunes and Windows Vista

Some good news from Apple:
Apple has released a new version of iTunes that addresses a number of compatibility issues with Windows Vista. iTunes 7.1 is recommended for use with most editions of Windows Vista, however, Apple is actively working with Microsoft to resolve a few remaining known issues.
It's not perfect yet, I guess. Apple points out a few remaining issues, and says its working with Microsoft to resolve them.

Labels: , ,

[ Posted at 10:10 AM | Permalink ]

 

Amazon Unbox 1.5

So, Amazon has shipped a new version of its Unbox TV/movie download service. The first version was so horrible I demanded my money back and erased the thing from my PC. It's unlikely I'll ever be brave enough to try it again, but here's what's new:

- 20% faster downloads
- Improved reliability and performance
- 50% faster application load time
- Reduced PC memory usage
- Full support for Windows Vista and Vista Media Center Edition
- Improved portable device support
- Download portable video files only when you want to!
- New user controls and settings
- Video brightness control
- Contrast control
- Video library organizational and sorting
- Optional tooltips
- Multiple file delete

Hmm. There's no such thing as Vista Media Center Edition. I see Amazon is up to its usual high standards.

Labels: , ,

[ Posted at 9:40 AM | Permalink ]

 

Monday, March 05, 2007

Download DVD Specification Gets Approval

IDG News:
A technology that allows movies to be downloaded and burned to blank DVDs using the same content-protection system as commercial discs received official approval on Thursday.

CSS Managed Recording was approved at a meeting of the DVD Forum in Tokyo.

The technology will require discs that are slightly different from the conventional DVD-Rs found in shops today. The burned discs will be compatible with the vast majority of consumer DVD players.
We're getting there. Slowly.

Labels: ,

[ Posted at 3:40 PM | Permalink ]

 

Thursday, March 01, 2007

Blockbuster in Talks To Acquire Movielink

WSJ:
Movie-rental giant Blockbuster Inc. is in advanced talks to acquire Movielink LLC, an online movie-downloading company owned by the major Hollywood studios, according to people familiar with the matter.

While the proposed deal is small -- the price is said to be less than $50 million in cash and stock -- it has important strategic implications. For Blockbuster, it represents a quick way into the online download business. Movielink has quietly peddled films online since 2002, with little success. In the past year or so, the nascent field has begun to pick up momentum, with big players like Apple Inc.'s.
This is actually pretty huge.

Mac-oriented people won't appreciate this, though they'll think Apple invented it when Apple TV comes out, but here's something I do all the time: We have an Xbox 360 connected to our largest TV (and a 5.1 home theater setup). We now use this Xbox as our primary TV interface, thanks to its Media Center Extender software, which connects to a Windows Vista-based Media Center PC (and cable box) back in my office. Using this interface, my kids watch recorded and live TV shows, and we access our entire photo, music, and video collections, all stored on the PC and server in the office. OK, fine. But we also rent movies via MovieLink, and it works seamlessly. It's unclear why MovieLink (and related services like CinemaNow) hav