![]() |
Internet NexusHome
Search this siteMore of my sitesWinInfo Daily News
|
Wednesday, October 03, 20078 Reasons Windows Users Don't SwitchSteven Leigh at AppleMatters makes up a nice, logical list that should be at the forefront of the mind of anyone concerned about whether Apple will continue gaining market share at Microsoft's expense. My feeling, frankly, is that the Mac has to plateau at some point, unless some of these issues are addressed:Experienced Mac users may not have the perspective that it takes to see what makes Windows users stay with Microsoft, and let’s face it, some Mac users (not you or me, of course) are just downright zealots.Well. Actually, the truth remains: Macs are more expensive than PCs, they still are. Yes, Macs are often comparably priced to similar PCs. The problem is that PCs come in many, many more price points, and unlike with Apple, PC users are used to choosing exactly what they want and getting it. This is a key differentiator that Mac fans often overlook. If you want to spend $1500-2000 on a PC, the iMac is competitive. But if you want to spend $500, there's a decent PC out there for you. The same is not true on the Mac side. It just isn't. 5. LiesYep. This one and number 6, Windows Bashing, are essentially the same thing. I remember watching the 20 or 30 minute Vista-bashing session at the WWDC conference and wondering why Steve Jobs is so insecure that he has to berate the opposition. Can you imagine shopping for a car and having the salesman only talk about what’s wrong with the competition’s cars?Brilliantly put. 8. Mac UsersThis is, quite possibly, the biggest problem facing the Mac community. You may not realize how serious this is. But consider this: Mac fanatics are like Detroit car lobbyists. They've spent decades doing nothing but propping up the Mothership, all for what they think is a good cause, but all they've really done is harmed the thing they love so much. People understand quality, and that's why so many are swayed by Apple's products. People also understand bullying, and that's why so many ignore Apple's products. The good news? We're already at the point with the iPod family that the vast majority of users are not Apple sycophants but rather normal consumers. And they're not concerned with the same issues that plague the fanatics. On the Mac, it's finally getting there too: As Apple gains market share each quarter, the percentage of crazies goes down just a bit. Pretty soon, they're the minority. They're still a loud minority. But they're a minority. Don't let the crazy people ruin the Mac, or the iPod, or the iPhone, and shout down the people who are honest enough to point out problems where they exist. That's just silly, and while Apple's fanatics might have been desirable or even necessary during the rebuilding years, now they're just dead weight. Good riddance, I say. Labels: Apple, iPhone, iPod, Mac, PC, Vista [ Posted at 10:03 PM | Permalink ]
Monday, September 24, 2007The iPhone is not a UMPC, sorryThe Apple Blog engages in a bit of wishful thinking:Microsoft had their chance at defining a market. They pushed for the creation of the Ultramobile PCs (“UMPCs”). The Windows-based mini-tablets have not found their market. However, the Apple iPhone (and now the iPod touch) is actually the UMPC done right.Um. Not quite. The iPhone isn't big enough to be a UMPC, and doesn't include USB ports so you can use a mouse and keyboard. It doesn't work with Mac OS X software and indeed can't be extended in any way. Heck, the iPhone doesn't even support Cut and Paste. Think about that for a second. What the iPhone really is, is a new computing platform. It sits at the Windows Mobile level, not the UMPC level. It's a smart phone for consumers, or an entertainment device. But it is most definitely not a UMPC, sorry. Labels: Apple, Internet, iPhone, Mac, PC [ Posted at 11:39 AM | Permalink ]
Saturday, September 22, 2007The Tao of SteveElizabeth Spiers looks into the psychology behind the Apple fanatic's fixation with the company and its leader:I blame Steve Jobs [for] seduced me into buying his sleek machines, even if their delicate organs seem to fail with alarming regularity, like the beautiful consumptive heroines in Victorian novels.I think this hits it on the head. What's interesting, of course, is that the bad parts of Mr. Jobs' personality--his prickly defensiveness whenever one suggests that an Apple product is lacking in some way, for example--seem to ooze down to the fanatics as well, as if by osmosis. You can see it in their vitriolic emails and their rabid and sometimes illogical defenses of the company in online forums. As the saying goes, they are a minority, but they are a very loud minority. Anyway. Though I like Apple's products quite a bit in general, one of my regular criticisms is that Steve--er, ah Apple--always choose style over functionality. You can go too far in the other direction, of course (HP anyone?) but I think there needs to be a middle ground. One example: Many MacBook/MacBook Pro users would really appreciate and frequently use a multi-format card reader built right into their machines. But Jobs will have none of that: Such a port would be an ugly gaping hole in the side of these sculpted masterpieces, and there's already two USB ports, so if you need such a thing, you can just figure it out yourself. But I would point to the Lenovo ThinkPad line--specifically the T61 I'm currently using--as the current apex of this compromise between style and substance. The T61 has a wonderful built-in media card (or not, your choice) and yet manages to be quite stylish. In fact, most people would agree that the ThinkPads are the most elegant notebooks around. Because they are. Maybe I'm just a tad too practical to completely embrace the Apple Way--or the "Tao of Steve," as Spiers accurately calls this intriguing lifestyle choice. I would absolutely choose functionality over style any time--my Motorola Q beats the iPhone hands down on this point--but do appreciate elegant form factors. Is there a middle ground in the PC or electronics industries? Lenovo? Sony? I'm honestly not sure. But I suppose if there were, few people would be fanatical about it. Curious. Labels: Apple, iPhone, Mac, PC [ Posted at 10:10 AM | Permalink ]
Friday, September 21, 2007Stephen Fry blogs smartphonesUK actor and comedian Stephen Fry is blogging now, and his first (lengthy) post is about the iPhone and other smartphones. It's hilarious and insightful, and it makes me wonder why he didn't start doing this sooner. It's almost as if Douglas Adams is back among us. Bless you Mr. Fry:All the big guns want an iPhone killer. Even I, mad for all things Apple as I am, want an iPhone killer. I want smart digital devices to be as good as mankind’s ingenuity can make them. I want us eternally to strive to improve and surprise. Bring on the iPhone killers. Bring them on.Brilliant. Note that because the site was running dog slow, I wasn't able to post this yesterday as I had wanted. Mr. Fry must be running on EDGE. :) [ Posted at 2:38 PM | Permalink ]
Monday, September 17, 2007More iPhone/iTunes ringtone sillinessSo Apple has finally posted a page on the iTunes Store that explains the all-too-complicated and restricted process by which iPhone customers can make (and pay twice for) ringtones. Here's what it looks like:
But what's that I spy at the bottom right of the page? Yep, it's some ringtones Apple has synced with their iPhone: "Imperial March" (John Williams, from "The Empire Strikes Back," an excellent song for a ringtone), and "Like a Rolling Stone," presumably the Bob Dylan version, since Apple CEO Steve Jobs is such a huge Dylan fan:
Let's go find them in the iTunes Store and make some ringtones!
First... Imperial March, er ah... hmmm....
Curious. It's not available as a ringtone. Now why would Apple use that in their example? Surely, we'll have better luck with the Dylan song. I mean, Jobs loves Dylan.
Huh.
This time, you can actually buy a song with that name, assuming you want the versions by The Rascals, The Young Rascals, or Dino, Desi, and Billy. And who the heck wouldn't?
Long story short, this whole ringtones thing remains a joke one week later. Obviously. [ Posted at 11:47 AM | Permalink ]
Wednesday, September 12, 2007iPhoneyHarvard Business Online offers what is, perhaps, the most interesting reaction I've seen yet to the iPhone price drop:The immediate effect on supply-and-demand is not the only issue at stake when it comes to this (or any other) price-cutting decision: it also impacts the perception of authenticity ... we treat Apple as an exemplar of what we call "original authenticity." Almost everything Apple designs -- from its gorgeous computers and sleek iPods to its retail experiences -- seeks to stimulate in customers a sense of discovery and self-exploration. But what this decision seems to do -- and what the reaction from early iPhone adopters bears out -- is lessen the originality of the concept. It's clearly a swing for the masses, leaving behind those who saw themselves in the uniqueness of the design. It says the iPhone is a commodity like any other phone, not original enough even in its own designer's eyes to maintain a premium price. We thought the real Apple was better than that.Thanks Ian. [ Posted at 3:24 PM | Permalink ]
Tuesday, September 11, 2007Jobs Offers Apple Lisa Early Adopters Store CreditLOL. BBSpot, the "Onion" of the tech world:Early adopters of the iPhone weren't the only ones receiving in-store credit from Steve Jobs. In an overlooked announcement, Jobs said that early adopters of the Apple Lisa would be receiving a $7000 in-store credit.Good stuff. [ Posted at 2:26 PM | Permalink ]
Argh.... Ringtones still don't work (properly)So after posting all those shots I actually completed syncing the iPhone ... and get this message:![]() WTF. It plays fine in iTunes. Update: You have to play the ringtone version in iTunes before it will sync. (Not the song.) Sorry, but this isn't obvious at all. This system is just broken as-is. There is no way normal people can use this easily. [ Posted at 10:22 AM | Permalink ]
Making a ringtone with iTunes 7.4.xFull-sized images at source:
iTunes ringtones go live ... sort ofSo I discovered this morning that the new Ringtones feature is live in iTunes 7.4.x, sort of: My only attempt thus far at making a ringtone has ended in the following error:Could not create ringtone. An unknown error occurred (-42160). There was an error in the iTunes Store. Please try again later. OK No big deal. But the ringtone creation process has revealed a glaring issue with this process. Not only do you have to find a ringtone-able song in the iTunes Store, but you don't actually get full ringtone making capabilities for your $1.98. What you get is the right to edit the song once, online, and make a short clip. You can't go back and make a different ringtone from the same song if you don't like the first one, without paying for it yet again. So that additional 99 cent fee just covers a single online editing experience, and one 15-second ringtone. Obviously, I'm not a big ringtone buyer. But this seems kind of silly to me. I'll have pictures in a bit. Update: I bought a new song and got it to work. Again, pictures soon. [ Posted at 9:48 AM | Permalink ]
Monday, September 10, 2007Apple Sells One Millionth iPhoneApple PR:Apple today announced it sold its one millionth iPhone yesterday, just 74 days after its introduction on June 29. iPhone combines three devices into one—a mobile phone, a widescreen iPod, and the best mobile Internet device ever—all based on Apple’s revolutionary multi-touch interface and pioneering software that allows users to control iPhone with just a tap, flick or pinch of their fingers.This is great news for anyone who believes, as I do, that the touch UI introduced on the iPhone has legs. Hopefully the new low price on the iPhone will drive a new round of innovation in this space. I'm thinking specifically of Apple opening up the platform to third party developers. Labels: iPhone [ Posted at 1:41 PM | Permalink ]
Jumping the iSharkThe New York Times touches on the topic du jour:Let me get this straight: Steve Jobs insists that songs on iTunes cost 99 cents and television episodes cost $1.99 because consumers crave simple pricing.This is interesting on a number of levels. First, the hypocrisy thing is pretty obvious. Second, that NBC has made its shows available on Amazon Unbox for less than they sold on iTunes is telling. Finally, the "sucker" comment closely resembles the "stooge" line I used the other day. I guess we're on the same page when it comes to the gotta-have-it gadget crowd and the Monday morning quarterbacking scenario where people have actually argued that they've gotten $200 of value out of the past two months of iPhone use. Egads. Labels: Apple, Digital media, iPhone, iPod, iTunes [ Posted at 1:33 PM | Permalink ]
Sunday, September 09, 2007How Steve Jobs Lost Control of iPod Launch
Then you don't understand the mentality of these people, Mr. Levy. They're proud and defensive about their insular little private club. Now that they've been revealed as stooges, these guys have lost their cachet and thus their sense of self and ego. Not only are millions and millions of people suddenly getting into their club, they're doing so at a vastly reduced price. Imagine buying a Lexus for $40,000 and then watching the company put it on sale for $25,000 two months later. And no, you didn't get $15,000 worth of use out of in two months, delusional self-justification notwithstanding. Anyway, Levy is right about one thing: The iPhone price cut certainly did overshadow the new iPods. But that's brilliant, because Apple will sell tens of millions of these new iPods this year regardless. Now they can sell millions of iPhone too. Brilliant. [ Posted at 10:29 AM | Permalink ]
Friday, September 07, 2007The Puppet Master ... And the PuppetsI, Cringely:Apple announced a variety of new and kinda-new iPods dominated by the iPod Touch (iPhone minus the phone) and an iPod Nano with video (great for watching miniseries). At the very end of the presentation, Jobs announced the iPhone price cut. Why did he wait until the very end? Because he knew the news would be disruptive and might have obscured his presentation of the new products. He KNEW there was going to be controversy. So much for the “Steve is simply out of touch with the world” theory.This is, perhaps, the most intelligent thing I've ever read about Steve Jobs. And he's dead-on about the connection between Apple fans and Apple employees: Jobs treats them both like utter crap--his trademark--and they just love him more for it. That he has been able to extend this relationship, remotely, to customers is astonishing. Steve Jobs is a god. An angry, spiteful god, but a god nonetheless. I know why you worship him. But I fear for you all the same. [ Posted at 12:42 PM | Permalink ]
Thursday, September 06, 2007An open letter to all iPhone customersLooks like the outrage over the iPhone price reduction was worse than some believed. Check out this open letter from Steve Jobs:I have received hundreds of emails from iPhone customers who are upset about Apple dropping the price of iPhone by $200 two months after it went on sale. After reading every one of these emails, I have some observations and conclusions.Hmm. Given that virtually everyone who bought an iPhone in the first two months was a huge Apple fan, this will probably satisfy most people. But this isn't a rebate at all, and I think that would have been a nicer gesture. Still, this is better than nothing, obviously. [ Posted at 4:27 PM | Permalink ]
Wednesday, September 05, 2007The $200 QuestionSo Apple took the unprecedented step of lowering the price of the iPhone by $200 to $400. Folks, that's a 33 percent price drop, and when you combine that with the fact that the iPhone has only been out for two months, I mean... My God. It's kind of insane.My opinion on this is that the iPhone isn't selling as well as Apple would like. You just don't drop prices that aggressively so quickly. Ever. Especially when you own mindshare like white owns rice. Especially when you're the company that can do no wrong. Today's iPod announcements would have been incredible without the iPhone price drop. But that's just an opinion. The question, of course, is this: Does this price cut screw the early adopters? You know, the people who actually waited in line, like lemmings, to get an overpriced gadget that will eventually sell millions of copies. The people who would pay anything for any product Apple cares to sell. The fanatics. Or, is Apple just doing The Right Thing (tm) and moving quickly to overcome what has clearly been the iPhone's biggest complaint? (Well, after EDGE. And that virtual keyboard. And the weird recessed headphone jack. And the insane international roaming bills. And... well, you get the idea.) I gave the iPhone a 3/5 rating in my recent review, and while I stand by that, I know that a lot of the Apple fans feel differently about this trendsetting product. Does this price cut change anything? Did you just get screwed? Labels: iPhone [ Posted at 7:34 PM | Permalink ]
Apple Fall 2007 Products: A TimelineSo it's September 5, 2007 and Apple just announced a bunch of brand new iPods and other related products. But as anyone who waited for an iPod mini back in early 2004 will tell you, an Apple announcement does not a product availability make. (Or, ahem, whatever.) So when can we actually expect to see these new products (in the US)? Here's a timeline.iPod shuffle Status: A hold-over from last year, but with new colors Pricing: $79 ($1 GB) Availability: Immediate Apple Store delivery estimate: Within 24 hours, but green version is "not available" iPod nano Status: Completely redesigned hardware and software Pricing: $149 (4 GB), $199 (8 GB) Availability: This weekend Apple Store shipping estimate: 1-3 business days iPod classic Status: Hardware is held-over from 2005, but with new software UI Pricing: $249 (80 GB), $349 (160 GB) Availability: This weekend Apple Store shipping estimate: 1-3 business days iPod touch Status: Completely new model, based on iPhone Pricing: $299 (8 GB), $399 (16 GB) Availability: Late this month Apple Store shipping estimate: By September 28 iPhone Status: 4 GB model dropped, now just a single model, otherwise unchanged Pricing: $399 (8 GB) Availability: Immediate Apple Store shipping estimate: Within 24 hours It will be interesting to see how the iPod touch availability, especially, matches Apple's promise. And let's not forget the weird new Starbucks service for the iPod touch and iPhone: According to Apple, that service will debut in New York and Seattle on October 2, 2007, and then be added to 350 Starbucks stores in the San Francisco Bay area on November 7, 2007, then 500 stores in Los Angeles in early February 2008, 300 stores in Chicago in March 2008, and additional markets throughout the US later in 2008. The service will be available throughout the US sometime in 2009. [ Posted at 4:06 PM | Permalink ]
First impressions: 'The Beat Goes On' AnnouncementsWhile I'll be reviewing Apple's new lineup of iPods on the SuperSite for Windows, I thought it would be interesting to toss out some thoughts about the devices based on the recently completed special event at which they were introduced. As always, the iPod line remains the standard by which all other portable media players are judged, and the Fall 2007 lineup is the strongest yet. Here's what it looks like, along with other revelations from "The Beat Goes On":No Beatles Despite persistent rumors and constant Beatles references during the Jobs keynote, "The Beatles" catalog was not made available on iTunes. (Yet.) Sigh. Grade: F iPod facts and figures The domination of iTunes and the iPod is astonishing. According to Apple, the company has distributed over 600 million copies of iTunes and has sold over 3 billion songs, 95 million TV shows, and has provided over 125,000 podcasts to listeners. Astonishing. Apple has sold over 110 million iPods to date, also astonishing. Grade: A+ iPod shuffle Apple added new colors and not much else to the $79 iPod shuffle, which was thoroughly revamped for last year. New colors include red (as in Product[RED]), purple, light blue, and light green, in addition to last year's silver color. Otherwise, the shuffle hasn't changed, up to and including the same 1 GB of storage space. This is mostly OK: The shuffle was fine as-is, but you'd think Apple might have bumped the storage to at least 2 GB. Grade: B iPod nano The best-selling nano is getting quite a bit fatter/wider thanks to a new QVGA 320 x 240 screen (equal to that of last year's iPod with video) that supports video as well as Cover Flow; it also comes with 3 iPod games. While I question the width increase of the new device (coming as it does with a non-updated music-only iPod shuffle), the new nano looks neat. It is all metal (though I doubt anyone was actually asking for that), thinner than before, and appears more rounded on the edges than the too-sharp-edged iPod with video from last year. It sports 24 hours of battery life for audio and 5 hours for video, both excellent. Pricing is reasonable at $149 for a 4 GB version and $199 for 8 GB. The new nano is available in five colors: black, red, gray, blue, and green. They look great overall. Grade: A iPod classic Replacing the old iPod with video (which some people think of simply as "iPod") is the new iPod classic. This player doesn't appear to be particularly exceptional other than the new storage options: It's the same basic size and shape as the previous iPod, but appears to have rounded edges, like the nano. (Assuming that's the case. It may be a photographic trick.) Anyway, the iPod classic is now all-metal (whatever), thinner than before, and comes in 80 GB and 160 GB variants. The 80 GB version gets 30 hours of battery life for audio and 6 hours for video; it costs $250. The 160 GB version gets 40 hours of battery life for audio and 7 hours for video; it costs $350. Both are reasonably priced, though the tiny screen is increasingly uninteresting in the wake of the Zune, iPod touch (see below), and iPhone. As before, the iPod classic comes only in black and white. Grade: B iPod touch Arguably the most impressive introduction of the event and the one countless digital media fans have been clamoring for, the iPod touch is basically the iPhone without any phone features. It features all the iPhone goodness you'd expect, including the multi-touch UI, the Cover Flow views, the icon-based home screen, and landscape video playback. The iPod touch does more than that, however. It includes integrated 802.11b/g Wi-Fi, like the iPhone, which you can use with its integrated Safari browser, YouTube application (a la iPhone), and... drumroll, please... the new mobile version of iTunes, dubbed iTunes Wi-Fi. Yep, Apple jumped on the obvious train and added that feature so many people were looking for: Buying music over the air. Sadly, you cannot sync over the air via Wi-Fi, which would have really completed the picture. There was also a Starbucks announcement that is barely worth mentioning, given that it will taken until 2009 to completely rollout, assuming it ever happens. The price is reasonable, but not exceptional, given the capacity: An 8 GB version is $300, while a 16 GB version will set you back $400. Battery life is great, 22 hours for audio and 5 for video, but then you won't be putting much video on this thing with such small amounts of built-in memory. The only reason this doesn't get an A+ is the storage: Even 16 GB is paltry for a video collection. I honestly believe customers would be OK with a thicker device if they could get an 80 GB or even 160 GB hard drive in there (with the resulting larger battery). Maybe someday that will happen, but this is a wonderful start. Grade: A- iPhone Apple is dropping the 4 GB iPhone and, most astonishingly, dropping the price of the 8 GB version by $200 to a much more reasonable $400. I've often referred to the price point on the iPhone as being exorbitant, but this brings it down to reality. Bravo to Apple for being this aggressive this quickly. The iPhone also picks up some iPod Touch features, like iTunes Wi-Fi (sweet) and the silly Starbucks application, as expected. Finally, Apple is adding one of many curiously missing features to the iPhone: Ringtone support. Now, customers can buy song ringtones for $1.98: 99 cents for the ringtone itself and 99 cents for the song. It's not the full iTunes catalog, however, but rather a 500,000 song subset. The new version of iTunes, being released "tonight," will also add a ringtone editor so you can recast nonprotected songs from your existing music collection into ringtones yourself. Neat. Grade: A iTunes 7.4/8? There's a new version of iTunes coming tonight, apparently. We don't know much about it beyond the new ringtones stuff and reverse sync with iTunes Wi-Fi, so there's no point in writing it up quite yet. Stay tuned. Grade: n/a Presentation As is often the case, Steve Jobs loves playing to the home crowd and the Apple friendly people in the audience--about half were Apple employees according to at least one blogger who was there--ate it all up. I don't like the lies--Apple isn't the first to add a Web browser to a portable media player, example--and I don't like the boasting, but there's no denying that Jobs is the master of this domain. Say what you will, but this time, at least, he was right on target. This stuff is excellent. Grade: A Overall, this was a solid even exciting event. I'm looking forward to reviewing the new iPods, and iTunes 8.0, if that's what it is. I'm also curious how Microsoft intends to answer this threat with new Zunes, and if that's even possible. Labels: Apple, iPhone, iPod, Zune [ Posted at 2:56 PM | Permalink ]
Monday, August 27, 2007Is Google About To Stab Apple in the Back With Google Phone?ParisLemon:Reports out of India suggest that Google will be releasing their rumored "Google Phone" worldwide in two weeks. The report is questionable for a number of reasons, the first of would probably have to be that it is only coming out of India, and the second of which is the unlikelihood that Google would stab their tech buddy Apple in the back by releasing a phone so soon after iPhone.I love this assertion. How, exactly, are Google and Apple "tech buddies"? The only "partnership" we've seen to date is a single uninteresting Google Maps application on the iPhone that doesn't even all of the features of the Web version. (Gmail support in iPhone Mail doesn't count; it's just POP3.) If you really look at it, there's more and better Yahoo! stuff on the iPhone than Google stuff. And yet, we've been treated to all kinds of Apple/Google rumors, none of which were ever true. (Two examples: Google would buy Apple, and Apple would switch .Mac mail to Google Apps/Gmail.) It's amazing to me how pervasive this baloney is. Just because someone says something doesn't make it true, no matter how often its repeated around the blogosphere. Anyway... It does seem to be fairly well assumed that Google is going to release a cellphone at some point in the future - and that it might even be free thanks to advertisements that would run on it. Also fairly likely is a phone from Microsoft, which may or may not be a ZunePhone.So, lots of good speculation there. (He even doubles up on the speculation in the first sentence, which might just be a record.) Let's forget about the Microsoft stuff, since they've been doing Windows Mobile since it was first called Windows CE back in 1996. I'm all for a gPhone or whatever they'd call it, as I'm a huge consumer of Google services. I have zero interest in advertising-based clients, however, and would gladly pay a monthly fee so as to not deal with that. But again, I have to wonder. Where do these rumors come from? And where does the rumor end and the truth begin? The rest of this post drives right off the deep end (apparently Nokia, Motorola and others are just going to lie down and die) so it gets pretty silly. But I'm intrigued by the possibility of a gPhone. Really intrigued. [ Posted at 10:41 AM | Permalink ]
The unholy Apple/AT&T alliance has been undone, but iPhone is still a waste of moneyTom Yager at InfoWorld:If your biggest gripe with Apple's flagship media player is that it refuses to make voice or data calls on anything but AT&T's wireless network, you're officially free. But the price of freedom, in this case, is either a very steady hand and soldering iron, or a willingness to send money to Australia in exchange for a "Turbo SIM," delivery date unknown. Of the two methods, I prefer the third: Buy a real phone. Following an exhaustive comparison of alternatives, I have overwhelming backing for my early conclusion that iPhone is vastly outmatched by several devices in its price class.There have been a lot of stories over the past few days about various successes unlocking the iPhone so that it works on non-AT&T cell phone networks. I picked this one because I'm amused that the "Enterprise Mac" (enjoy the oxymoron) guy at InfoWorld doesn't like the iPhone. I mean, both the Mac and iPhone are equally unsuited for the enterprise. Why not an "Enterprise iPhone" column? If you're going to be the crazy guy, you might has well just go for it. [ Posted at 10:35 AM | Permalink ]
Wednesday, August 22, 2007Apple iPhone Update 1.0.2It appears that Apple today released the second iPhone software update, 1.0.2. It's unclear what this changes per se--the release notes say only that "this version of the software includes bug fixes and supersedes all previous versions." I'm installing it now and looking for more information... [ Posted at 12:08 PM | Permalink ]
Monday, August 20, 2007Great artists steal ... well, thieves do, anywayYou know, this kind of thing really freaks me out. It's bad enough that the iPhone calculator (which I discuss ever so briefly in Part 4 of my iPhone review) is a horrible, silly, affair, with a UI that looks nothing like any other Apple iPhone or OS X application in existence. It turns out that it was stolen from elsewhere too. Absolutely brilliant:![]() BTW: Only a sycophant would call this an "homage." The iPhone calculator should look like an iPhone application at the very least and ideally offer a number of skins. Obviously. Thanks Jerry. [ Posted at 4:50 AM | Permalink ]
Sunday, August 19, 2007And This Is Your $4190.76 iPhone BillThe Consumerist:When Pierre visited Ibiza, Spain and Europe for two weeks, his iPhone went with him, and he returned with memories of a hedonistic summer vacation, and a $4190.76 bill from AT&T.There have been a lot of horror stories about the cost of using an iPhone in Europe. Since I'll be using one here in France for one month--we're almost three weeks into that time as I write this--it's an obvious concern. I was at least smart enough to enable AT&T's AT&T World Traveler plan before I left (see An American iPhone in Paris). The article quoted above doesn't specifically mention this, but it looks like Pierre forgot to do that. But as mentioned in the article, the iPhone should display a warning screen if you're using it in a high-cost area, like international. They should also offer the same low-cost international roaming options that you can get on a Blackberry ($70 a month for unlimited international roaming.) But they don't. Anyway. I've been monitoring my usage since then and trying to keep the data usage via EDGE to a minimum. What I've seen so far is this: - My voice usage has not been posted online all month. AT&T reports that "there are delays in reporting and processing call records ... Further delays may apply to roaming usage, which is based on call records received from other carriers. A delay of a minimum of two to ten days for roaming usage is usual and up to 60 days or longer is possible." Cute. But since I know that phone calls here are $1 a minute, the same sad price I'd pay for calls via our European phone, I'm OK with that. We've made a few calls a week and most were important. This is no different than what would have happened if we didn't bring an iPhone. - My data usage seems pretty low. AT&T breaks data into four categories, Text/IM messaging, multimedia messaging, video share calling, and "Internet/MEdia Net" (which I think of as Internet). (And the iPhone can't use the multimedia messaging and video share calling services.) My total data usage since late July, most of which occurred here in France, has been just 1.26 MB, all Internet usage. However, I'm not on Pierre's plan. I'm on AT World Traveler, which charges 2 cents per KB. And if my math is correct, 2 cents times 1259 KB is $25.18, a pretty exorbitant fee for that amount of data traffic, but nothing close to $4000. I've also sent 6 text messages, for which I pay 50 cents each, or $3. So... When you add it all up, my iPhone usage (hopefully) this month is $5.99 for AT&T World Traveller, $25.18 for data usage, and $3 for text messages, for a total of $34.17, not including voice charges. (Which could be as high as $100, I guess, but what the heck, we've been here a month. We've also used Skype for checking voice mails and for a few work calls.) The problem with this math is that it assumes that AT&T's data, which I access online, is complete. It does appear to be for the data, and that's the important part. Fingers crossed. [ Posted at 5:50 AM | Permalink ]
Tuesday, August 07, 2007iPhone Owners: "We Like It, But..."I'm amused that PC World has borrowed my "But..." language with regards to the iPhone:A little more than a month after the Apple iPhone went on sale, nearly 90 percent of iPhone owners who answered a PC World survey said that they love their almost-new toy. But they also had a few complaints--most notably regarding the iPhone's voice and data networks--and lots of suggestions.As I wrote back on June 30, the iPhone is fantastic, but... "because every time you want to point out something positive, you have to amend a 'but...' onto the end of it." The fanatics blasted me for this sort of heretical talk, but the truth is the truth. And in this case, the truth is that the iPhone is fantastic. But it needs a lot of work. Labels: iPhone [ Posted at 11:14 AM | Permalink ]
Friday, August 03, 2007iPhone 1.01 updateSome shots of the iPhone 1.01 update in Vista:Labels: iPhone [ Posted at 5:37 AM | Permalink ]
Thursday, August 02, 2007An American iPhone in ParisWith a looming trip to France coming, I basically had two options with regards to the recently-released iPhone: I could bring it along and actually use the thing, sucking up whatever monstrous fees AT&T charges for international roaming, or bring it along and barely use it at all. Not bringing the iPhone wasn't an option: I'm in the middle of a lengthy review of the device and I intend to finish that by the end of the month. So I opted to bring it and really use the heck out of it. (And good thing, too: This week, Apple shipped the first iPhone software update.)Before doing so, however, you have to call AT&T and set up international roaming. This involves dialing a toll-free number, wading through AT&T's annoying but typical automated phone system and, if you called on a weekend like I did, waiting to do it all again on Monday. When I did get on the line with a human being, I was impressed with her professionalism and thoroughness, if that means anything to you. She described the three possible options, once the phone was configured for international roaming (note that if you don't make this call before you leave, you can't make it work until after that trip): 1. Do nothing. Calls made internationally will cost $1.29 a minute, and you'll be charged 2 cents per KB for data usage. Text messages are 50 cents per message sent. Received text messages are free. 2. Join the AT&T World Traveler for $5.99 a month. The nice thing about this charge is that you can enable it and disable it whenever you want, so I enabled it for August and will turn it off when I get back. Calls made internationally cost 99 cents a minute, but you'll still be charged 2 cents per KB for data usage. Text message prices are the same as above as well. 3. AT&T also offers a plan for $29 a month that essentially gives you unlimited international voice calls and a decent amount of data usage per month (I forget the details). The problem is that you can't opt out of it for under a year, so if you sign up, you have to pay for 12 months worth, or a total of about $360. Side note: What I wasn't impressed by, at least not in a positive way, was how AT&T verified that it was me calling. They asked me four (very) personal questions, many of which I found quite shocking. For example, the first question was, "Which one of the following three companies were you previously employed by?" She then read off a list of banks, one of which I worked at over 15 years ago. The second question regarded addresses I'd live at (from the Phoenix area, about 15 years ago). Then another one about previous jobs (from about 12 years ago). The last one was, "Which of the following mortgage companies have you done business with?" Yikes. Privacy advocates should have a field day with this one. As far as the roaming options went, I ended up going with the second one for what I assume are obvious reasons. I've been trying to stay off of EDGE while in France (via Bouygues Telecom in the Paris area) because of the expense, and I've disabled a few things that might trigger network access repeatedly, like email. But I'm guessing we're going to have a healthy bill when we return. All in the interests of testing, of course. I will say this: For a few years now, we've had a cell phone that we use specifically for Europe, and it's got an unlocked SIM card. That phone has worked much more poorly than has the iPhone this first week, and since the phone costs are basically identical, we've pretty much just switched to using the iPhone for calls here. Actually, it's nice having two phones, since there are days when my wife and kids will stay in the city when I return to the home we're staying at to work. As a frequent international traveler, I'm looking forward to what I assume is an inevitable future where we can simply bring our phones back and forth between continents and not pay extravagant fees for the privilege. The iPhone certainly gets the ease of use thing right, though I suspect a lot of people will be burned by the need to call first to enable international roaming. Next, I'd like to see Apple/AT&T tackle the international roaming charges. This should be less expensive, though of course that's not unique to the iPhone. [ Posted at 11:29 AM | Permalink ]
iPhone Software Version 1.0.1Apple throws out the first iPhone update a few weeks later than expected but offers up very little in the way of information:Bug fixesI've got the iPhone up and running in France--in fact, when I have a second, I have interesting info to post about that--so I've installed the update and will see what happiness it brings. Hopefully, it at least adds some stability fixes. Labels: iPhone [ Posted at 4:10 AM | Permalink ]
Tuesday, July 24, 2007AT&T iPhone activations disappointReuters:AT&T reported initial data on activations for Apple's iPhone that were disappointing to some investors. [Just some? --Paul] AT&T said Tuesday that it activated 146,000 iPhones in the first few days of its availability.Bloomberg: The iPhone activations were a "disappointment," Piper Jaffray & Co. analyst Gene Munster said in a research note. He estimated that Apple sold 200,000 iPhones in the two days to end the quarter. Analyst David Bailey of Goldman Sachs Group Inc. had estimated that AT&T and Apple sold 700,000 iPhones in their first three-day weekend.AT&T, obviously, is the weak link in the iPhone plan. I wonder whether they call customers "chum" or if the word "churn" just reminded me of that word? :) Labels: iPhone [ Posted at 12:53 PM | Permalink ]
Friday, July 20, 2007How to add custom ringtones/system sounds to the iPhoneHack the iPhone:Custom ringtones are one of the biggest requests by people that want to modify their iPhone to make it unique. This page will teach you how to add your own files to the iPhone to use as a ringtone.Note that this link is for Windows users. Intel Mac users should look here. Labels: iPhone [ Posted at 1:45 PM | Permalink ]
iPhone Contract Is Long and Legally MurkyLike most cell phone contracts, then. Wired:Apple CEO Steve Jobs proudly proclaimed the iPhone one of the most intuitive devices ever made. Not so for the iPhone's terms-of-service contract, which at 17,000 words is one of the longest and most complex ever to accompany a wireless gadget, legal experts say.Woo. [ Posted at 1:36 PM | Permalink ]
Tuesday, July 17, 2007iPhone: Prepay the right wayA nice bit of trickery to get around AT&T 2-year service agreement, courtesy of TUAW:If you want to set up your iPhone as a prepaid account, do not--no that's not emphatic enough--do NOT, DO NOT attempt to set up the account in advance with AT&T.Related: Apple iPhone Activation Without a 2-year Agreement Labels: iPhone [ Posted at 5:29 PM | Permalink ]
Tuesday, July 10, 2007iPhone synching woes, Part 3OK, the final round: This time, I tried syncing the iPhone with Outlook 2003 running on Windows XP with Service Pack 2 (SP2). As per the last installment, I did a clean install of XP with SP2, installed the 100+ post-SP2 critical and suggested fixes, installed Office (this time Office 2003), and configured Outlook with two local calendars, adding a single appointment to each for testing. (Outlook 2003 does not support subscribing to Internet-based calendars like Google Calendar, so I had to skip that for this test. See below for a workaround.) Then I installed the current version of iTunes, plugged in the iPhone, restored it, and set up syncing.I got not love, sorry. As with previous attempts, iTunes refused to see that there were multiple calendars configured and grayed out the "Selected calendars" option, leaving just "All calendars," which isn't really "all calendars" at all, but is instead "the default local calendar only." After sync, I could see the appointment I made in this calendar, but not the one in the other local calendar. Game over. I've now tried to make this work on two separate Windows versions and two separate Outlook versions. (And on the Mac, too, meaning I've tried virtually every supported combination of operating systems and calendars.) It's clear that, on Windows at least (Apple's biggest market), iPhone sync is horribly broken. Regardless of the supported Windows or Office version you use, the iPhone will only sync with the single default local calendar in Outlook, and not with any other calendars, be they local or Internet-based. This is a problem for a number of reasons, but the most damning is that calendar sync with multiple calendars (local, Internet, whatever) actually works fine with a normal iPod. Why it can't work with the iPhone--where, frankly, PIM sync is clearly more important--is unclear. And not to beat this to death, but seriously, Apple, could you support something other than Outlook? How about Windows Calendar? Google Calendar? Something. With that horror show out of the way, I turned my attention to actually syncing Google Calendar with the iPhone. To make this work, you need to use a third-party tool that syncs Google Calendar with Outlook; I use SyncMyCal for this purpose and it works wonderfully, even the free version (which requires manual syncing). After installing SyncMyCal, I configured it to sync into the default local calendar in Outlook 2007, plugged in the iPhone, restored it, and synced it up ... again. This time, success. And it only took five iPhone restores over two OSes, two versions of Office, and three different PCs (and a Mac, just for testing). Oh, and a third party sync application that, unlike iTunes, actually works. It's amazing how satisfying "it just works" can be when it actually does work. Labels: iPhone [ Posted at 9:35 PM | Permalink ]
iPhone synching woes, Part 2After uploading my original iPhone synching woes post the other day, I received a bunch of feedback from readers wondering whether the problems weren't caused by Apple's lackluster support of Windows Vista. I was wondering the same thing, but I was also wondering whether Office (Outlook) 2007 might be the culprit as well. (Or, put another way, whether Apple's lackluster support of Outlook 2007 might be the issue.)So I began testing a few things. First up: A fresh install of Windows XP with Service Pack 2 (SP2) on an older Lenovo ThinkPad T43. I had vowed to never use XP again, so this was painful, all the more so since Microsoft hasn't shipped a new XP service pack since SP2 three years ago: I had to download over 100 updates from Microsoft Update and reboot three times before it was done. Then I installed Office 2007 Professional, configured Outlook with a subscribed Google Calendar, and then installed iTunes. Then, I plugged in the iPhone, let iTunes download the iPhone software update, and restore the device. Then it was time to sync. The sync options are virtually identical to those presented in Vista, with one logical exception: On XP, you can sync email with Outlook Express if you want. I chose Yahoo! for contacts, Outlook for calendar, and IE for bookmarks, and hoped for the best. Bzzzt. Just as with Vista, the iPhone dashboard in iTunes can't see any Outlook calendars: The "Selected calendars" option, again, is grayed out. I'm vaguely glad that Vista isn't the problem. So, it's back to the drawing board. Next up, I will test this with Window XP SP2 and Outlook 2003 instead of Outlook 2007. Hey, you never know. In the meantime, this is somewhat depressing: As I noted previously, sync is basic smart phone functionality. This just needs to work. Update: Before wiping out this install, I decided to add a test calendar item to the default Outlook calendar ("Calendar") to see whether it appeared on the iPhone after syncing. It did, which suggests that local calendars work, but subscribed (Internet) calendars do not. That said, iTunes still won't show that you even have multiple calendars, and of course, subscribed Internet calendars work fine if you sync from iCal on the Mac. And what about secondary local calendars? I created a new calendar in Outlook, "iPhone calendar," and created an appointment in there too. Rebooted. Re-synced. Nothing. So maybe it's not only just local calendars that work, but only the primary local calendar. Did I mention this was aggravating? :) Labels: iPhone [ Posted at 3:38 PM | Permalink ]
Putting Google On Your PhoneA fantastic post from Google Blogoscoped:Reto Meier of the Radioactive Yak blog recently turned his cell phone into a “Google Phone,” and he’ll explain how you can do the same through the different mobile-optimized sites and Java clients Google offers.Virtually all of this stuff works great on my Q. A few of them work well on the iPhone too, and of course the iPhone has a slick Google Maps application built-in. I certainly have spent a lot of time ensuring that most of these are in my phones. BTW: Google Reader on the iPhone may be the Safari killer app. RSS just looks great on the iPhone. Labels: Google, iPhone, Mobile [ Posted at 10:05 AM | Permalink ]
Monday, July 09, 2007And so it begins...I've tried to remain very calm and measured in my reaction to the iPhone. It's not perfect, and it doesn't get some very basic things right, even as it raises the bar for mobile devices. Needless to say, I'm viewed as negative (and even a Microsoft toadie) for being brash enough to actually criticize the thing. But I think the iPhone is important. It's just not the be-all, end-all that some hype-sucking journalists would have you believe.Well, the inevitable backtracking is starting to finally creep into the iPhone conversation. You may recall that I noted a few weeks ago that the truth of the iPhone would become obvious after weeks of real, normal people actually using the device. Today, The Boston Globe's Hiawatha Bray, who previously penned an iPhone mini-review called "Believe the hype," has come back down to earth. No offense, but this is exactly the kind of baloney I was warning about when the first round of "OHMYGOD OOHMYGOD HMYGOD" reviews came out: Despite the iPhone's indisputable cool, it would have to be well-nigh perfect to get $600 out of my wallet. And it's a long way from perfect.It's amazing what actually using a product can do to color your opinion. People, Apple can hype their own products. We shouldn't be doing it for them, especially if we haven't actually used the thing. The iPhone is good technology. But it can only get better at this point and it's still unclear to me that this device is a decent solution for most people. Someone who writes for a mainstream publication like The Boston Globe should understand that, and understand their audience. And for crying out loud, learn to separate hype from reality. Labels: iPhone [ Posted at 1:52 PM | Permalink ]
Sunday, July 08, 2007iPhone synching woesI desperately want to give the iPhone a proper review, I do. The problem is, the buggy little device won't work consistently enough for me to remain all that positive about it. Case in point: Sync. It's been a complete disaster.I initially attached the iPhone to my Vista Ultimate-based Media Center PC, my main desktop machine, and the place where my master music and photo libraries are stored (and, in the case of music, managed via iTunes). The Media Center PC has been quite reliable and stable, and it's been blasting recorded TV shows and other content over the network to an Xbox 360 Media Center Extender in the living for about eight months without a major hiccup. This should work fine, right? On Windows, the iPhone supports contacts syncing from Yahoo! Contacts, Outlook, and Windows Contacts, but it only offers Calendar syncing from Outlook. Since my contacts are available in Outlook format, and it's easy enough to subscribe to Google Calendar (which I use for my scheduling needs), I chose Outlook for both. I ultimately turned off email syncing (since I use Web-based Gmail) and toggled between Safari and IE bookmark syncing, just to see how it works. (The lack of any Mozilla facilities on the iPhone is, of course, disturbing.) Here's what happened: Contacts. Contacts syncing worked just fine and I could access all my needed phone numbers via the iPhone's Phone application. Calendar. Calendar synching never worked. In iTunes, you can supposedly choose between "All calendars" or a list of calendars from which you can select the calendars you want to sync. Despite the fact that Outlook has multiple calendars, one of which is local (the cunningly named "Calendar") and one of which is the subscribed Google Calendar, the "Selected calendars" choice is grayed out an unavailable. But here's the thing: I know it works, because my various Outlook calendars are choosable on the iPod's sync page in iTunes. So they work there but not on the iPhone. Irritating? You bet. ![]() Email. Never attempted and never will. Bookmarks. This worked fine from both IE and Safari, but created folders in the iPhone's Safari browser, requiring me to navigate down to find the bookmarks. Yugh. Not useless, but close. Sync is not two-way, however: If you create bookmarks on the phone, they don't appear in the synced desktop browser. iPhone-based Photos. If you take photos with your iPhone and connect it to the PC, the Windows application for acquiring photos is supposed to start up, allowing you to download the photos to the PC. This never worked on the Media Center PC. In order to see what a real sync experience was like, I tried the Mac next. When I first connected the device to the Mac, iPhoto popped up, allowing me to download those photos I couldn't get to on the PC, which was nice. Then I restored the iPhone and started over. Here's what happened: Contacts. You can choose between Mac OS X's Address Book application and Yahoo! Contacts, but on the Mac, you get one additional feature: You can sync your Yahoo! Contacts list with Address Book as part of the synchronization pass, which I chose, thus populating Address Book on the Mac with a relatively up-to-date copy of my contacts list. The iPhone-based Contacts list worked properly as well. Calendar. I subscribed to Google Calendar with Apple's iCal application and was able to choose just that calendar to sync with via iTunes. Finally, I could see my schedule on the iPhone. It's pretty attractive looking. Email. Never attempted and never will. Bookmarks. Here, the Mac is actually more limited than the PC: You can only sync with Safari, with the same hierarchical folder issues noted above. Not to belabor the point, but I'd really, really like to see Mozilla support here. iPhone-based Photos. Photo importing always worked fine. When I had taken photos on the phone and the connected it to the Mac, iPhoto would pop-up to download them. Syncing with a Mac is cute, and I'm glad I could test it, but the reality is, I live in a Windows world, as will most iPhone users. So I turned to my latest notebook, a Lenovo ThinkPad T61 running Windows Vista Ultimate. The sync results, alas, were similar to the Media Center PC. (Maybe it's an Outlook 2007 issue?) Further problematic: The iPhone's Wi-Fi will no longer connected to my home network for some reason. I type in the passcode and it says it cannot connect. My notebooks all work fine, and the iPhone worked fine previously. Maybe another restore will fix that, but for now, here are the sync results: Contacts. Works similarly to the Media Center PC. Calendar. As with the Media Center PC, I can't choose between my various Outlook-based calendars as the choice is grayed out. However, when the default choice (all calendars) is selected, the iPhone did sync with an old and out of date copy of my calendar that is in the default Outlook Calendar (again, named "Calednar"). So it sort of worked, but won't see other calendars, including a second local calendar I created for testing. Email. Never attempted and never will. Bookmarks. Works similarly to the Media Center PC. iPhone-based Photos. This time, photo importing did work, which was welcome, and Vista's built-in photo acquisition utility does appear when I connect the iPhone with fresh photos to download. Overall, the sync experience has been exasperating. The only time it worked correctly was on the Mac, go figure, and I can't see myself using that as my central management point for contacts and calendar. (And while I didn't really discuss this aspect of it here, I had to copy over my iTunes library to the Mac to get music, podcasts, and videos on the device. I'm not going to keep that up-to-date on the Mac over time either.) What's needed here, obviously, is better compatibility with existing solutions (Outlook, primarily) and compatibility with a much wider range of email, calendar, and browser applications. Mozilla support should be obvious, but what about supporting popular Web-based services like Google Calendar too? I realize the iPhone is a 1.0 product, but fixing these issues and increasing compatibility should be Job One for whoever at Apple is working on this part of the iPhone and iTunes. It's a huge problem. Labels: iPhone [ Posted at 11:45 AM | Permalink ]
Saturday, July 07, 2007iPhone Web DeviPhone Web Dev is clearly a site to watch if you care about the iPhone:The iPhone will be the premier platform for portable Web 2.0 applications. This website is a community of web developers helping other web developers to create the best possible web applications for the iPhone.I discovered this on Scobelizer. Labels: iPhone [ Posted at 2:06 PM | Permalink ]
iPhone Parody No FlashCourtesy of You Tube:Irony number 2: You can't view this post on the iPhone. (That was a joke, people: YouTube uses H.264 now.) Thanks Charles. [ Posted at 2:02 PM | Permalink ]
Friday, July 06, 2007iPhone rhetorical question of the dayIf the iPhone supports both Wi-Fi and Bluetooth (not to mention EDGE), why can't it sync wirelessly?Labels: iPhone [ Posted at 9:47 AM | Permalink ]
Thursday, July 05, 2007iPhone observation: Podcast supportApple can and should be credited with jumpstarting the podcast craze by adding decent podcast support to iTunes and the iPod, and this support carries across, for the most part, on the iPhone. Sadly, because the iTunes application only supports five main buttons--Playlists, Artists, Songs, Videos, and More by default, you have to hop into the "More ghetto" to access your podcasts. Things work as expected with one huge exception: Video podcasts only play back audio when accessed through the Podcasts list. (Flip the screen, and you'll see album art in Cover Flow view, as you would for a music file.) If you actually want to see the video, you need to access them through the Videos list. Seems like a curious omission. (To be fair, this is what happens on the iPod too: There, you have to access video podcasts through the Video Podcasts sub-menu under Video.)Tip: Thankfully, you can configure the first four buttons in the iTunes application, so I've replaced Songs with Podcasts, as I will use that more frequently. Labels: Digital media, iPhone [ Posted at 1:00 PM | Permalink ]
Web Development for iPhoneApple finally posts its guidelines for developing iPhone "applications":Developers can create Web 2.0 applications that look and behave just like the applications built into iPhone, and provide seamless integration with iPhone applications and services including making a phone call, sending an email, and displaying a location in Google Maps. Third-party applications created using web standards can extend iPhone's capabilities without compromising its reliability or security.Not surprisingly, a little blurb right on the front page essentially corroborates my theory that Apple released Safari for Windows specifically to facilitate iPhone development. ("The first step in developing a web application for iPhone is to ensure it is fully compatible with Safari. Safari 3 Public Beta, now available for Mac and Windows, provides you with the ideal environment for Safari on iPhone compatibility testing.") Labels: Apple, Internet, iPhone, Mobile [ Posted at 10:39 AM | Permalink ]
Semi-obvious iPhone/iPod futuresI was among the crowd of people clamoring for a phone-less iPhone-like iPod back when Steve Jobs first announced the device at the January 2007 Macworld, and I still think that would be a great idea, especially if it could be fitted with a real hard drive. But while wrestling with some weird sync issues over the weekend, another thought occurred to me, and while I'm sure this is equally obvious, I'll spell it out anyway: Apple should sell an iPod-less iPhone as well.You might call such a thing the iPhone nano (with apologies to David Letterman and his even more obvious recent spoof of such a device). And here's why I think this would be a killer idea: After I couldn't get the iPhone to sync with my Outlook calendar properly, I decided to nuke from space ("restore" the device in iPhone parlance) and see what the sync experience is like on the Mac. No surprise, it's better. But since I didn't have any music on my Mac at first, my initial sync was just calendar (Google Calendar via iCal) and contacts (Yahoo Mail contacts via Apple's Address Book application). This information takes up almost no space at all on the device. But what you're left with is a stunningly usable phone and personal information manager. Indeed, once you get rid of most of the storage space--I'm thinking 1 GB would do it for whatever random photos you might take--you can also dispense with a lot of the battery, since that's pretty much only needed for media playback anyway. You could therefore make a phone-only iPhone--the iPhone nano--that was about one-half to two-thirds the size of the existing device, while retaining the same basic proportions. A smaller phone would be highly desirable to a lot of people, methinks. Meanwhile, a future video iPod that's based on the iPhone could arguably be a bit bigger than the current iPhone, while still losing the phone features (and associated monthly charges). This could become the new high-end iPod, designed primarily for TV, movie, and other video content. Just a thought. Labels: Apple, Digital media, iPhone, iPod, Mobile [ Posted at 10:30 AM | Permalink ]
Wednesday, July 04, 2007Happy 4thHere's a cool photo taken with the iPhone...
iPhone Out-of-Warranty Battery Replacement ProgramApple:Apple will repair your iPhone for a service fee of $79, plus $6.95 shipping. Be sure to follow [Apple's] instructions for optimizing battery life and troubleshooting battery charging issues before submitting your iPhone for battery replacement.You didn't think this was going to be free, did you? Fair enough, this is, after all, for out of warranty replacements. But three days sans phone is a bit much. Incidentally, the iPhone warranty is one year (PDF download). I'm curious that it's not warranted for the length of your AT&T service agreement. Labels: iPhone [ Posted at 12:18 PM | Permalink ]
DVD Jon joins iPhone hacking brigadeGuardian:The iPhone launched over the weekend, and it's already got a gang of hardcore hackers playing with it and trying to decouple it from the AT&T network. The latest? Jon Lech Johansen - better known as DVD Jon.Interesting. Obviously, there's a huge market of people who just want the iP |